Bank Recapitalisation and Credit Growth: The Indian Case

Verma, Radheshyam and Herwadkar, Snehal (2019): Bank Recapitalisation and Credit Growth: The Indian Case.

Abstract

The continuing deterioration in asset quality of public sector banks in India since 2012 has had multidimensional ramifications. On the one hand, while significant loan loss provisions were required to be kept, eroding the profitability of these banks, on the other hand, it affected their risk-taking ability and resources available for on-lending to commercial sector. From a macroeconomic perspective thus, poor asset quality and lower economic growth reinforced each other into a vicious cycle. The government intermittently infused capital in the public-sector banks, but most of that was absorbed by the continuing deterioration in asset quality, delaying the revival in the credit growth cycle. This led to the question of how much capital infusion is necessary to kick-start the credit cycle. Using bank-wise data for the period 2008-18, the present study analyses this question in a dynamic panel framework. The findings of the study suggest that the relationship between bank capital and credit growth is non-linear. Any amount of recapitalisation in banks is may be helpful in accelerating credit growth. However, the study found the single threshold level 13.1 per cent of CRAR level would be optimal. Above this threshold level, incremental increase in bank capital has positive but declining marginal effects on lending.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Bank capital, regulatory capital, recapitalisation, bank lending.
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages

References

Acharya, V. V. (2017), ‘The Unfinished Agenda: Restoring Public Sector Bank Health in India’, R K Talwar Memorial Lecture by Deputy Governor, Reserve Bank of India at Hotel Trident, Mumbai on September 7, 2017, available at https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Speeches/PDFs/IIBFVA09072017437215FBE69A442CB8E227778F5A2B23.PDF accessed on August 14, 2018.

Armstrong, A and M. Ebell (2014), ‘Capital Constraints, Lending over the Cycle and the Precautionary Motive: A Quantitative Exploration,’ National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London.

Berrospide, J. M. and M. E. Rochelle (2010), ‘The Effects of Bank Capital on Lending: What Do We Know, and What Does It Mean?’, International Journal of Central Banking, Vol. 6, pp. 5-54.

Brei, M,, L. Gambacorta, G. von Peter (2013), ‘Rescue Packages and Bank Lending’, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol 37, pp. 490-505.

Catalán, M., A. Hoffmaister, and H. Cicilia (2017), ‘Bank Capital and Lending: An Extended Framework and Evidence of Nonlinearity’, IMF Working Paper No. 17/252.

Cohen, B. H. (2013), ‘How Have Banks Adjusted to Higher Capital Requirements?,’ BIS Quarterly Review, September.

Gambacorta, L. and H.S. Shin (2016), ‘Why Bank Capital Matters for Monetary Policy’, BIS Working Paper, No. 58.

Giannetti, M. and A. Simonov (2013), ‘On the Real Effects of Bank Bailouts: Micro Evidence from Japan’, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, Vol 5, pp. 135-167.

Hansen, B. E. (1999), ‘Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference,’ Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 93(2), pp. 345-368, December.

Ministry of Finance (2017): ‘Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Recapitalisation of Public Sector Banks’, Report No. 28 of 2017, Performance Audit.