Alvi, Mohsin (2019): Difference in choice of occupation among linguistic communities of Karachi.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_97572.pdf Download (156kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Pakistan is a country where more than 57 languages are being spoken, belong to different cultural background. Karachi, being the biggest city and the major economic arena of the country, is a place where many communities reside together. To name the major communities, there are Urdu speaking, Memon, Makrani, Agha Khani, Hazara, Hindu, Christian, Parsi, Bohri, Pashtun, Punjabi, Balochi, Behari, Bangali and Sindhi. The aim of the present research is to investigate if there a difference exists in the choice of occupation in the major linguistic communities in Karachi. The occupations were categorized into three domains: business, government jobs, and private jobs. A forth category was made for the people who were jobless. The sample of 479 participants consisted of 331 men and 48 women out of whom 83 belonged to Bangali, 99 Memon, 53 Punjabi, 17 Pushto, 125 Sindhi, and 102 to Urdu community. Participants were asked two simple questions: which linguistic community they belong to, and what occupation they belong to. Results demonstrated difference in the choice of occupation among different linguistic communities. Memon and Bangali prefer to be a businessman while a bigger proportion of private jobs is occupied by Urdu speakers while the government sector is predominantly a place of job for Sindhi speakers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Difference in choice of occupation among linguistic communities of Karachi |
English Title: | Difference in choice of occupation among linguistic communities of Karachi |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Languages, Occupations, Gender, Descriptive Statistics, Karachi |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration N - Economic History > N3 - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development |
Item ID: | 97572 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Mohsin Hassan Alvi |
Date Deposited: | 19 Dec 2019 02:38 |
Last Modified: | 19 Dec 2019 02:38 |
References: | [1] Ali, S. .R. (2012, 20th June). Regional languages of Pakistan. [Weblog]. Retrieved 13 February 2016, from http://nation.com.pk/national/20-Jun-2012/regional-languages-of-pakistan [2] Alvi, Mohsin (2015). The impact of packet size on inventory turnover of FMCG products in Pakistan: wholesaler and retailer perspective. International Journal of Emperical Finance, 4(3), 165 – 169 [3] Barrett L. F.et al. (2007), "Language as a Context for Emotion Perception," Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11: 327–32. [4] Bell, A. (1980). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145-204. [5] Bond, M. H. (1983). How language variation affects inter-cultural differentiation of values by Hong Kong bilinguals. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 57-66. [6] Boroditsky, L. (2009, 6th november). How Does Our Language Shape The Way We Think?. [Weblog]. Retrieved 13 February 2016, from https://edge.org/conversation/lera_boroditsky-how-does-our-language-shape-the-way-we-think [7] Boroditsky, L. (2003). Linguistic Relativity, in L. Nadel ed., Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (London: MacMillan), 917–921; [8] Boroditsky L, et al. (2003). Sex, Syntax, and Semantics, in D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow, eds., Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2), 61–79. [9] Boroditsky, L. (2007) "Do English and Mandarin Speakers Think Differently About Time?" Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. 34. [10] Casasanto D, et al. (2004) "How Deep Are Effects of Language on Thought? Time Estimation in Speakers of English, Indonesian Greek, and Spanish," Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 575–80. [11] Clark, H. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J.-F. L. Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287-296). New York: North Holland. [12] D'Andrade, R. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion (pp. 88-122). New York: Cambridge University Press. [13] Deresky, H. (2008). International Management: Managing Across Border and Cultures. Fifth Edition, Pearson Education. [14] De Villiers, J. G. & de Villiers, P. A. "Linguistic Determinism and False Belief," in P. Mitchell and K. Riggs, eds., Children's Reasoning and the Mind (Hove, UK: Psychology Press, in press); [15] Earle, M. (1969). A cross-cultural and cross-language comparison of dogmatism scores. Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 19-24. [16] Edmonds, M. (2010, 14 June). How do culturally different people interpret nonverbal communication?. [Weblog]. Retrieved 13 February 2016, from http://people.howstuffworks.com/nonverbal-communication.htm [17] Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1989a). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203-219. [18] Graumann, C. F. (1989). Perspective setting and taking in verbal interaction. In R. Dietrich & C. F. Graumann (Eds.), Language processing in social context. Amsterdam: North-Holland. [19] Historypakcom. (2013, 15 July). Karachi - The most largest. [Weblog]. Retrieved 13 February 2016, from http://historypak.com/karachi-the-most-largest/ [20] Krauss, R.M. & Chiu, C. (2016). Language and Social Behavior. a pre-editing copy of a chapter that appears in In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4h ed.), Vol. 2. (pp. 41-88). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Retrieved 13 February 2016, from http://www.columbia.edu/~rmk7/PDF/HSP.pdf [21] Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9, 2-24. [22] Lucy, J. A. & Gaskins, S., "Interaction of Language Type and Referent Type in the Development of Nonverbal Classification Preferences," in Gentner and Goldin-Meadow, 465–92; [23] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. [24] Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S., & Heiman, R. J. (1996). Culture and "basic" psychological principles. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 857-913). New York: Guildord. [25] Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978. [26] Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971. [27] Pelham, B. W., et al. (2002), Why Susie Sells Seashells by the Seashore: Implicit Egotism and Major Life Decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 469–86; [28] Pica, P. et al. (2004), "Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group." Science, 306, 499–503 [29] Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York, p. 7. [30] Shweder, R. A., & Sullivan, M. A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, (pp. 399-416). New York: Guilford [31] Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York: Basic Books. [32] Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211, 453–458 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/97572 |