Inter-industry trade and heterogeneous firms: Country size matters

Xu, Hangtian and Zhou, Yiming (2019): Inter-industry trade and heterogeneous firms: Country size matters.

Abstract

This study investigates how industries with different patterns of firm heterogeneity are distributed across countries by developing a three-sector general-equilibrium model. There are two manufacturing industries in our setting: one in which firm productivity is homogeneous and the other in which it is heterogeneous. The higher degree of firm heterogeneity in the latter reflects the larger difference in firm heterogeneity between industries. We show that the larger country is more specialized in the industry with heterogeneous (homogeneous) firms when trade costs are low (high) and that an increase in the inter-industry difference in firm heterogeneity fosters the larger country's degree of specialization in the industry with heterogeneous firms. We also disclose the trade patterns across countries and show how they respond to trade liberalization. Moreover, wages are found to be higher in the larger country, with an increase in the inter-industry difference in firm heterogeneity enlarging the wage inequality across countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Firm heterogeneity; Industrial specialization; Trade patterns
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation; F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F22 - International Migration; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity

References

[1] Amiti, M. (1998), “Inter-industry trade in manufactures: Does country size matter?” Journal of International Economics 44, 231-255.

[2] Antras, P., and E. Helpman (2004), “Global sourcing,” Journal of Political Economy 112, 552-580.

[3] Aw, B. Y., S. Chung, and M. J. Roberts (2003), “Productivity, output, and failure: A comparison of Taiwanese and Korean manufacturers,” The Economic Journal 113, 485-510.

[4] Aw, B. Y., and Y. Lee (2008), “Firm heterogeneity and location choice of Taiwanese multinationals,” Journal of International Economics 75, 167-179.

[5] Baldwin, R. E., and P. Krugman (2004), “Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonisation,” European Economic Review 48, 1-23.

[6] Baldwin, R. E., and T. Okubo (2006), “Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: Spatial selection and sorting,” Journal of Economic Geography 6, 323-346.

[7] Bernard, A. B., S. J. Redding, and P. K. Schott (2007), “Comparative advantage and heterogeneous firms,” Review of Economic Studies 74, 31-66.

[8] Breinlich, H. (2006), “The spatial income structure in the EU: What role for economic geography?” Journal of Economic Geography 6, 593-617.

[9] Chen, M. X., and M. O. Moore (2010), “Location decision of heterogeneous multi-national firms,” Journal of International Economics 80, 188-199.

[10] Dixit, A. K., and J. E. Stiglitz (1977), “Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity,” American Economic Review 67, 297-308.

[11] Ehrlich, M., and T. Seidel (2013), “More similar firms-More similar regions? On the role of firm heterogeneity for agglomeration,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 43, 539-548.

[12] Ehrlich, M., and T. Seidel (2015), “Regional implications of finanial market development: Industry location and income inequality,” European Economic Review 73, 85-102.

[13] Forslid, R., and T. Okubo (2014), “Spatial sorting with heterogeneous firms and heterogeneous sectors,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 46, 42-56.

[14] Gatto, M. D., G. I. P. Ottaviano, and M. Pagnini (2008), “Openness to trade and industry cost dispersion: Evidence from a panel of Italian firms,” Journal of Regional Science 48, 97-129.

[15] Head, K., and T. Mayer (2006), “Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 36, 573-595.

[16] Head, K., and T. Mayer (2011), “Gravity, market potential and economic development,” Journal of Economic Geography 11, 281-294.

[17] Helpman, E., and P. Krugman (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

[18] Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and S. R. Yeaple (2004), “Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms,” American Economic Review 94, 300-316.

[19] Krugman, P. (1980), “Sale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade,” American Economic Review 70, 950-959.

[20] Krugman, P. (1991), “Increasing returns and economic geography,” Journal of Political Economy 99, 483-499.

[21] Krugman, P., and A. Venables (1995), “Globalization and the inequality of nations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 857-880.

[22] Laussel, D., and T. Paul (2007), “Trade and the location of industries: Some new results,” Journal of International Economics 71, 148-166.

[23] Martin, P., and C. A. Rogers (1995), “Industrial location and public infrastructure,” Journal of International Economics 39, 335-351.

[24] Melitz, M. (2003), “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity,” Econometrica 71, 1695-1725.

[25] Melitz, M., and G. I. P. Ottaviano (2008), “Market size, trade, and productivity,” Review of Economic Studies 75, 295-316.

[26] Mossay, P., and T. Tabuchi (2015), “Preferential trade agreements harm third countries,” The Economic Journal 125, 1964-1985.

[27] Murata, Y., and J. Thisse (2005), “A simple model of economic geography a la Helpman-Tabuchi,” Journal of Urban Economics 58, 137-155.

[28] Nocke, V. (2006), “A gap for me: Entrepreneurs and entry,” Journal of the European Economic Association 4, 929-955.

[29] Okubo, T. (2009), “Trade liberalisation and agglomeration with firm heterogeneity: Forward and backward linkages,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 39, 530- 541.

[30] Okubo, T., P. M. Picard, and J.-F. Thisse (2010), “The spatial selection of heterogeneous firms,” Journal of International Economics 82, 230-237.

[31] Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2011), “‘New’ new economic geography: firm heterogeneity and agglomeration economies,” Journal of Economic Geography 11, 231-240.

[32] Puga, D., and A. J. Venables (1997), “Preferetial trading arrangements and industrial location,” Journal of International Economics 43, 347-368.

[33] Redding, S. J. (2013), “Economic geography: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature,” In: D. Bernhofen, R. Falvey, D. Greenaway, U. Kreickemeier (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of International Trade, 497-531. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

[34] Ricci, L. A. (1999), “Economic geography and comparative advantage: Agglomeration versus specialization,” European Economic Review 43, 357-377.

[35] Saito, H. (2015), “Firm heterogeneity, multiplant choice, and agglomeration,” Journal of Regional Science 55, 540-559.

[36] Saito, H., M. Gopinath, and J. J. Wu (2011), “Heterogeneous firms, trade liberalization and agglomeration,” Canadian Journal of Economics 44, 541-560.

[37] Samuelson, P. (1954), “The transfer problem and transport costs, II: Analysis of trade impediments,” The Economic Journal 64, 264-289.

[38] Takahashi, T., H. Takatsuka, and D.-Z. Zeng (2013), “Spatial inequality, globalization and footloose capital,” Economic Theory 53, 213-238.

[39] Venables, A. J. (1996), “Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries,” International Economic Review 37, 341-359.

[40] Zhou, Y. (2018), “Heterogeneous firms, urban costs and agglomeration,” International Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming. doi: 10.1111/ijet.12194.

[41] Zhou, Y. (2019), “Spatial inequality and urban costs: Revisiting the home market effect,” Journal of Regional Science 59, 302-321.