Santos, Mariana (2020): The impact of labor income tax progressivity on the fiscal multipliers in the context of fiscal consolidation programs.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_98736.pdf Download (716kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Fiscal multipliers depend on several structural characteristics of each economy. In this work project it is argued that labor income tax progressivity lowers fiscal multipliers of fiscal consolidation programs. By calibrating a model with incomplete-markets and overlapping generations for the United States, for different values of the labor income tax progressivity, it is shown that as progressivity increases, the recessionary impacts of fiscal consolidation programs are lower in the case of consolidation through decrease of government spending and are more recessionary in the case of consolidation financed with tax hikes. The first case is explained through the positive relationship between labor tax progressvity and the percentage of borrowing constrained agents in the economy. In the second case the results are linked to the distortionary effects in the economy of increasing tax progressivity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The impact of labor income tax progressivity on the fiscal multipliers in the context of fiscal consolidation programs |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fiscal Multipliers; Labor Income Tax Progressivity; Government Spending; Taxation |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H30 - General |
Item ID: | 98736 |
Depositing User: | Mariana Santos |
Date Deposited: | 06 Mar 2020 16:52 |
Last Modified: | 06 Mar 2020 16:52 |
References: | [1] Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (2010). Large changes in fiscal policy: taxes versus spending. Tax policy and the economy, 24(1), 35-68. [2] Alesina, A., Favero, C., & Giavazzi, F. (2019). Austerity: When it Works and when it Doesn't. Princeton University Press. [3] Batini, N., Eyraud, L., & Weber, A. (2014). A simple method to compute fiscal multipliers (No. 14-93). International Monetary Fund. [4] Benabou, R. (2002). Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous‐agent economy: What levels of redistribution maximize growth and efficiency?. Econometrica, 70(2), 481-517. [5] Blanchard, O. J., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review, 103(3), 117-20. [6] Brinca, P., Faria-e-Castro, M., Homem Ferreira, M., & Holter, H. (2019). The nonlinear effects of fiscal policy. FRB St. Louis Working Paper, (2019-15). [7] Brinca, P., Holter, H. A., Krusell, P., & Malafry, L. (2016). Fiscal multipliers in the 21st century. Journal of Monetary Economics, 77, 53-69. [8] Brinca, P., Homem Ferreira, M., Franco, F. A., Holter, H. A., & Malafry, L. (2019). Fiscal consolidation programs and income inequality. Available at SSRN 3071357. [9] Cugnasca, A., & Rother, P. (2015). Fiscal multipliers during consolidation: evidence from the European Union (No. 1863). ECB Working Paper. [10] Eyraud, L., & Weber, A. (2013). The challenge of debt reduction during fiscal consolidation (No. 13-67). International Monetary Fund. [11] Gechert, S., & Will, H. (2012). Fiscal multipliers: A meta regression analysis (No. 97). IMK working paper. [12] Guner, N., Lopez-Daneri, M., & Ventura, G. (2016). Heterogeneity and Government revenues: Higher taxes at the top?. Journal of Monetary Economics, 80, 69-85. [13] Heathcote, J., Storesletten, K., & Violante, G. L. (2017). Optimal tax progressivity: An analytical framework. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1693-1754. [14] Holter, H. A., Krueger, D., & Stepanchuk, S. (2019). How do tax progressivity and household heterogeneity affect Laffer curves?. Quantitative Economics, 10(4), 1317-1356. [15] Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., & Végh, C. A. (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers?. Journal of monetary economics, 60(2), 239-254. [16] Joumard, I., Pisu, M., & Bloch, D. (2013). Tackling income inequality. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2012(1), 37-70. [17] Krusell, P., & Smith Jr, A. A. (1999). On the welfare effects of eliminating business cycles. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2(1), 245-272. [18] Navarro, G., & Ferriere, A. (2016). The Heterogeneous Effects of Government Spending: It's All About Taxes. In 2016 Meeting Papers (No. 1286). Society for Economic Dynamics. [19] Taylor, A. M., & Jordà, Ò. (2013). The Time for Austerity: Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Fiscal Policy. [20] Trabandt, M., & Uhlig, H. (2011). The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(4), 305-327. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/98736 |