Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Login | Create Account

A comment on "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf"

Alcantud, José Carlos R. and García-Sanz, María D. (2009): A comment on "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf". Unpublished.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
170Kb

Abstract

We reexamine the analysis of Chambers (Social Choice and Welfare, 2009), that produces a characterization of a family of social welfare functions in the context of intergenerational equity: namely, those that coincide with either the sup, inf, lim sup, or lim inf rule. Reinforcement, ordinal covariance, and monotonicity jointly identify such class of rules. We show that the addition of a suitable axiom to this three properties permits to characterize each particular rule. A discussion of the respective distinctive properties is provided.

Item Type:MPRA Paper
Language:English
Keywords:Social welfare function; Intergenerational equity; Lim sup ; Lim inf
Subjects:D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General
D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice and Growth > D90 - General
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General
ID Code:14763
Deposited By:Dr Jose Carlos R. Alcantud
Deposited On:21. Apr 2009 16:04
Last Modified:20. Oct 2009 11:17
References:

Asheim, G. B., Mitra, T. and Tungodden, B. (2007): A new equity condition for infinite utility streams and the possibility of being Paretian. In: Roemer, J., Suzumura, K. (Eds.), Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability: Conference Proceedings of the IWEA Roundtable Meeting on Intergenerational Equity (Palgrave).

Asheim, G. B. and Tungodden, B. (2004): Resolving distributional conflicts between generations, Economic Theory 24, 221-230.

Asheim, G. B. and Banerjee, K. (2009): Fixed-step anonymous overtaking and catching-up, mimeo, University of Oslo.

Basu, K. and Mitra, T. (2007): Utilitarianism for infinite Uuility streams: a new welfare criterion and its axiomatic characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 133, 350-373.

Bossert, W., Sprumont, Y. and Suzumura, K. (2007): Ordering infinite utility streams. Journal of Economic Theory 135, 579-589.

Chambers, C. P. (2009): Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf. Social Choice and Welfare 32 (2), 243-252.

D'Aspremont, C. (2007): Formal welfarism and intergenerational equity. In: Roemer, J., Suzumura, K. (Eds.), Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability: Conference Proceedings of the IWEA Roundtable Meeting on Intergenerational Equity (Palgrave).

Fleurbaey, M. and Michel, P. (2003): Intertemporal equity and the extension of the Ramsey principle. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 39, 777-802.

Koopmans, T.C. (1960): Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28, 287-309.

Lauwers, L. (1997): Rawlsian equity and generalized utilitarianism with an infinite population. Economic Theory 9, 143-150.

Lauwers, L. (1998): Intertemporal objective functions: strong Pareto versus anonymity. Mathematical Social Sciences 35, 37-55.

All papers reproduced by permission. Reproduction and distribution subject to the approval of the copyright owners.

Repository Staff Only: edit this item

LMU-Logo
MPRA is a RePEc service hosted by
the Munich University Library in Germany.