Emissions Trends, Labour Productivity Dynamics and Time-Related Events - Sector Heterogeneous Analyses of Decoupling/Recoupling on a 1990-2006 NAMEA

Marin, Giovanni and Mazzanti, Massimiliano (2009): Emissions Trends, Labour Productivity Dynamics and Time-Related Events - Sector Heterogeneous Analyses of Decoupling/Recoupling on a 1990-2006 NAMEA. Unpublished.

Abstract

This paper provides new empirical evidence on Environmental Kuznets Curves (EKC) for CO2 and air pollutants at sector level. A panel dataset based on the Italian NAMEA (National Accounting Matrix including Environmental Accounts) over 1990-2006 is analysed, focusing on both emissions efficiency (EKC model) and total emissions (IPAT model). Results show that, looking at sector evidence, both decoupling and also eventually re-coupling trends could emerge along the path of economic development. The overall performance on here CO2, is not compliant with Kyoto targets. SOx and NOx show decreasing patterns, though the shape is affected by some outlier sectors with regard to joint emission-productivity dynamics. Services tend to present stronger delinking patterns across emissions than manufacturing. Trade expansion validates the pollution haven in some cases, but also show negative signs when only EU15 trade is considered: this may due to technology spillovers and a positive ‘race to the top’ rather than the bottom among EU15 trade partners. General R&D expenditure show weak correlation with emissions efficiency. EKC and IPAT derived models provide similar conclusions overall. Finally, we used SUR estimators (Seemingly Unrelated Regressions) for EKC models on manufacturing to have more efficient panel estimates (constrained model) and to test for slope heterogeneity (unconstrained model): the empirical evidence for CO2 and SOx emissions suggests that of manufacturing the slope varies across sectors. Further research should be directed towards deeper investigation of trade relationship at sector level and increased research into and efforts to produce specific sectoral data on ‘environmental innovations’.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: NAMEA, trade openness, labour productivity, STIRPAT, SURE
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Econometric Methods: Single Equation Models; Single Variables > C23 - Models with Panel Data; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounting; Environmental Equity; O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Alberola E., Chevallier J., Chèze B., 2008, Price drivers and structural breaks in European carbon prices 2005-2007, Energy Policy, 36 (2), pp. 787-797

Alberola E., Chevallier J., Chèze B., 2009, The EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Country-Specific Perspectives of the Impacts of Industrial Production on Carbon Prices, Journal of Policy Modelling, forthcoming

Barker T., Rosendahl K. E., 2000, Ancillary Benefits of GHG Mitigation in Europe: SO2, NOx and PM10 reductions from policies to meet Kyoto targets using the E3ME model and EXTERNE valuations, Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Proceedings of an IPCC Co-Sponsored Workshop, March, OECD, Paris

Baum C. F., 2001, Residual diagnostics for cross-section time series regression models, The Stata Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 101-104

Berndt E. R., Wood D. O., 1979, Engineering and Econometric Interpretations of Energy-Capital Complementarity, The American Economic Review, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 342-354

Bruvoll A., Medin H., 2003, Factors behind the environmental Kuznets curve. A decomposition of the changes in air pollution, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 27-48

Casler S. D., Rose A., 1998, Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the U.S. Economy, Environmental and Resource Economics, 11 (3-4), pp. 349-363

Cole M. A., 2003, Development, Trade and the Environment: How Robust is the Environmental Kuznets Curve? Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 557-80

Cole M. A., 2004, Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages, Ecological Economics, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 71-81

Cole M. A., 2005, Re-examining the pollution-income relationship: a random coefficients approach, Economics Bulletin, Vol. 14, pp. 1-7

Cole M. A., Elliott R., 2002, Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulation, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, No. 46, pp. 363-383

Cole M. A., Elliott R., Shimamoto K., 2006, Why the grass is not always greener: the competing effects of environmental regulations and factor intensities on US specialization, Ecological Economics, Vol. 54, pp. 95-109

Cole M. A., Neumayer E., 2004, Examining the Impact of Demographic Factors on Air Pollution, Population & environment, 26 (1), pp. 5-21

Cole M. A., Rayner A., Bates J., 1997, The EKC: an empirical analysis, Environment and Development Economics, 2, pp. 401-16

Copeland B. R., Taylor M. S., 2004, Trade, growth and the environment, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 42, pp. 7-71

de Haan M., 2001, A Structural Decomposition Analysis of Pollution in the Netherlands, Economic System Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 181-196

de Haan M., Keuning S.J., 1996, Taking the environment into account: the NAMEA approach, The Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 42, pp. 131-48

Dietz T., Rosa E. A., 1994, Rethinking the Environmental Impacts of Population, Affluence and Technology, Human Ecology Review, No. 1, pp. 277-300

Dietzenbacher E., Mukhopadhay K., 2006, An empirical examination of the pollution haven hypothesis for India: towards a green Leontief paradox?, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 36, pp. 427-49

EEA, 2004a, Air Emissions in Europe, 1990-2000, Copenhagen, European Environment Agency

EEA, 2004b, Air Pollution and Climate Change Policies in Europe: Exploring Linkages and the Added Value of an Integrated Approach, EEA Technical report No. 5/2004, Copenhagen, European Environment Agency

Egli H, Steger T. M., 2007, A Dynamic Model of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning Point and Public Policy, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 16, pp. 15-34

Femia A., Marra Campanale R., 2010, Production-related air emissions: a decomposition analysis for Italy, in Mazzanti M., Montini A., 2010, Environmental Efficiency, Innovation and Economic Performance, Routledge

Femia A., Panfili P., 2005, Analytical applications of the NAMEA, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Italian Statistics society, Rome

Fischer Kowalski M., Amann C., 2001, Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: globalization as a vital factor in analyzing the environmental impact of socio economic metabolism, Population and the Environment, Vol. 23

Frankel J., Rose A., 2005, Is trade good or bad for the environment? The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 85-91

Hsiao C., (2003), Analysis of panel data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Ike T., 1999, A Japanese NAMEA, Structural change and economic dynamics, Vol. 10, pp. 122-149

Kagawa S., Inamura H., 2001, A Structural Decomposition of Energy Consumption Based on a Hybrid Rectangular Input-Output Framework: Japan’s Case, Economic Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 339-363

Kagawa S., Inamura H., 2004, A Spatial Structural Decomposition Analysis of Chinese and Japanese Energy Demand: 1985-1990, Economic Systems Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 279-299

Keuning S., van Dalen J., de Haan M., 1999, The Netherlands’ NAMEA; presentation, usage and future extensions, Structural change and economic dynamics, Vol. 10, pp. 15-37

Koetse M. J., de Groot H. L. F., Florax R. J. G. M., 2008, Capital-energy substitution and shifts in factor demand: A meta analysis, Energy Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 2236-2251

Jacobsen H. K., 2000, Energy Demand, Structural Change and Trade: A Decomposition Analysis of the Danish Manufacturing Industry, Economic Systems Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 319-343

List J. A., Gallet C. A., 1999, Does one size fits all?, Ecological Economics, Vol. 31, pp. 409-424

Markandya A., Rübbelke D. T. G., 2003, Ancillary Benefits of Climate Policy, Nota di lavoro No. 105, Milan, FEEM

Martinez-Zarzoso I., 2009, A General Framework for Estimating Global CO2 Emissions, paper presented at the EAERE 2009 Conference in Amsterdam, 24-27 June 2009, Amsterdam

Martinez-Zarzoso I., Bengochea-Morancho A., Morales-Lage R., 2007, The impact of population on CO2 emissions: evidence from European countries, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 38, pp. 497-512

Mazzanti M., Zoboli R., 2009, Environmental efficiency and labour productivity: trade-off or joint dynamics?, Ecological Economics, Vol. 38, pp. 1182-1194

Mazzanti M., Montini A., Zoboli R., 2008a, Environmental Kuznets curve for air pollutant emissions in Italy: evidence from environmental accounts NAMEA panel data, Economic System Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 279-305

Mazzanti M., Montini A., Zoboli R., 2008b, Environmental Kuznets Curves and Greenhouse gas emissions. Evidence from NAMEA and provincial data, International journal of global environmental issues, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 392-424

Muradian R., O’Connor M., Martinez-Alier J., 2002, Embodied pollution in trade: estimating the environmental load displacement of industrialised countries, Ecological Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 51-67

Nakamura S., 1999, An inter-industry approach to analyzing economic and environmental effects of the recycling of waste, Ecological economics, Vol. 28, pp. 133-145

Nansai K., Kagawa S., Moriguchi Y., 2007, Proposal of a simple indicator for sustainable consumption: classifying goods and services into three types focusing on their optimal consumption levels, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, Issue 10, pp. 879-885

Pearce D., 1992, Secondary Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Control, CSERGE Working Paper 92-12 (London)

Pearce D., 2000, Policy Framework for the Ancillary Benefits of Climate Change Policies, Paper Presented at the IPCC Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategies (Washington DC)

Pontoglio S., 2010, An early assessment of the influence on eco-innovation of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme – Evidence from the Italian paper industry, in Mazzanti M., Montini A. (ed.), 2010, Environmental Efficiency, Innovation and Economic Performance, Routledge

Smith S., Swierzbinski J., 2007, Assessing the performance of the UK Emission Trading Scheme, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 37, pp. 131-158

Steenge A., 1999, Input-output theory and institutional aspects of environmental policy, Structural change and economic dynamics, Vol. 10, pp. 161-76

Stern D., 2004, Elasticities of Substitution and Complementarity, Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics, No. 20/2004

UN, Eurostat, IMF, OECD, World Bank, 2003, Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting 2003 – Handbook of National Accounting, Final Draft circulated for information prior to official editing, http://unstats.un.org/UNSD/envaccounting

Vaze P., 1999, A NAMEA for the UK, Structural change and economic dynamics, Vol. 10, pp. 99-121

Vollebergh H., Kemfert C., 2005, The role of technological change for a sustainable development, Ecological Economics, Vol. 54, pp. 133-147

Wier M., 1998, Sources of Changes in Emissions from Energy: A Structural Decomposition Analysis, Economic system research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 99-112

York R., Rosa E. A., Dietz T., 2003, STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts, Ecological Economics, No. 46, pp. 351-365

Zellner A., 1962, An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Test for Aggregation Bias, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 57, No. 298, pp. 348-368

Zellner A., 1963, Estimators for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations: Some Exact Finite Sample Results, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 58, No. 304, pp. 977-992

Zellner A., Huang D. S., 1962, Further Properties of Efficient Estimators for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations, International Economic Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 330-313

Zoboli R., 1996, Technology and Changing Population Structure: Environmental Implications for the Advanced Countries, Dynamis-Quaderni, 6/96, Milan, IDSE-CNR, www.idse.mi.cnr.it

Zugravu N., Millock K., Duchene G., 2008, The Factors Behind CO2 Emission Reduction in Transition Economies, Nota di lavoro No. 58, Milan, FEEM