Open Source Licensing in Mixed Markets, or Why Open Source Software Does Not Succeed

Gaudeul, Alexia (2008): Open Source Licensing in Mixed Markets, or Why Open Source Software Does Not Succeed.

Abstract

The rivalry between developers of open source and proprietary software encourages open source developers to court users and respond to their needs. If the open source developer wants to promote her own open source standard and solutions, she may choose liberal license terms such as those of the Berkeley Software Distribution as proprietary developers will then find it easier to adopt her standard in their products. If she wants to promote the use of open source software per se, she may use more restrictive license terms such as the General Public License to discourage proprietary appropriation of her effort. I show that open source software that comes late into a market will be less likely than more innovative open source software to be compatible with proprietary software, but is also more likely to be made more accessible to inexperienced users.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Open Source; Software; Standards; Compatibility; Network Effects; Duopoly; Mixed Markets; Intellectual Property; Copyright; Licensing
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L17 - Open Source Products and Markets; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets

References

ADAM, A. E. (2004): “Hacking into Hacking: Gender and the Hacker Phenomenon,” ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 32(7).

BESSEN, J. (2006): “The Economics of Open Source Software Development,” in Open Source Software: Free Provision Of Complex Public Goods, ed. by J. Bitzer, and P. J. H. Schröder, pp. 57-81. Elsevier: Amsterdam, http://ssrn.com/abstract=588763.

BITZER, J., AND P. J. H. SCHRÖDER (2006): “The impact of entry and competition by open source software on innovation activity,” in The Economics of Open Source Software Development, ed. by J. Bitzer, and P. J. H. Schröder, pp. 219-246. Elsevier: Amsterdam.

BONACCORSI, A., AND C. ROSSI (2003): “Why open source sofware can succeed,” Research Policy, 32, 1243-1258.

BONACCORSI, A., AND C. ROSSI (2006): “Comparing Motivations of Individual Programmers and Firms to Take Part in the Open Source Movement: From Community to Business,” Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 18(4), 40-64.

CASADESUS-MASANELL, R., AND P. GHEMAWAT (2006): “Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows,” Management Science, 52(7), 1072-1085.

COMINO, S., AND F. M. MANENTI (2005): “Government Policies Supporting Open Source Software for the Mass Market,” Review of Industrial Organization, 26, 217-240.

FRANKE, N., AND E. VON HIPPEL (2003): “Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security software,” Research Policy, Special Issue on Open Source Software, 32(7), 1199-1215.

GAUDEUL, A. (2007): “Do Open Source Developers Respond to Competition?: The (LA)TEX case study,” Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 239-263.

GHOSH, R. A., R. GLOTT, B. KRIEGER, AND G. ROBLES (2002): “Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study,” Part IV: Survey of Developers.

HERTEL, G., S. NIEDNER, AND S. HERRMANN (2003): “Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux Kernel,” Research Policy, 32(7), 1159-1177.

JOHNSON, J. P. (2002): “Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(4), 637-662.

JOHNSON, J. P. (2006): “Collaboration, Peer Review and Open Source Software,” Information Economics and Policy, 18(4), 477-497.

KATZ, M., AND C. SHAPIRO (1985): “Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, 75, 424-440.

KLINCEWICZ, K. (2005): “Innovativeness of open source software projects,” Discussion paper, Tokyo Institute of Technology and Warsaw University.

KOENIG, J. (2004): “Seven open source business strategies for competitive advantage,” IT Manager’s Journal, http://www.itmanagersjournal.com/feature/314.

KUAN, J. (2002): “Open Source Software as Lead User’s Make or Buy Decision: A study of Open and Closed Source Quality,” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford University.

LERNER, J., AND J. TIROLE (2002): “Some Simple Economics of Open Source,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(2), 197-234.

LIN, Y. (2006): “Women in Free/Libre Open Source Software Development,” in The Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology, ed. by E. M. Trauth, vol. 2, pp. 1286-1291. Idea Group Publishing: Hershey, PA.

LYMAN, J. (2005): “Getting in touch with the feminine side of open source,” NewsForge, http://www.newsforge.com/articles/05/08/08/1449259.shtml.

MUSTONEN, M. (2005): “When Does a Firm Support Substitute Open Source Programming?,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(1), 121-139.

NICHOLS, D., AND M. TWIDALE (2003): “The usability of open source software,” First Monday, 8(1).

RATLIFF, C. (2005): “Gender and Open Source,” http://culturecat.net/node/889.

RAYMOND, E. (2001): The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

RAYMOND, E. (2002): “Why Open Source will rule,” ZDNet, March 28.

SCHMIDT, K., AND M. SCHNITZER (2003): “Public Subsidies for Open-Source? Some Economic Policy Issues of the Software Market,” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 26, 473-505.

THE ECONOMIST (2006): “Open-source business,” March 16th 2006.

VON HIPPEL, E. (1994): “`Sticky Information´ and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation,” Management Science, 40(4), 429-439.

VON HIPPEL, E. (1998): “Economics of Product Development by Users: The Impact of “Sticky” Local Information,” Management Science, 44(5), 629-644.

VON HIPPEL, E. (2005): Democratizing Innovation. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

VON KROGH, G., S. SPAETH, AND K. R. LAKHANI (2003): “Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study,” Research Policy, 32, 1217-1241.

VON KROGH, G., AND E. VON HIPPEL (2003): “Special Issue on Open Source Software Development,” Research Policy, 32, 1149-1157.