Balogun, Emmanuel Dele and Dauda, Risikat O. S. (2012): Poverty and employment impact of trade liberalization in Nigeria: empirical evidence and policy implications.
Download (206Kb) | Preview
This paper analyzes quarterly data which spans the period 1985 to 2010 to investigate the interrelationship between trade liberalisation, employment dynamics and the implications for poverty alleviation in Nigeria. An overview of macroeconomic trends and patterns during the period show that although the Nigerian economy experienced growth, it was accompanied by rapid rise in unemployment and poverty. The econometric analysis, estimated by systems equation model, related terms of trade, implicit producer price incentives, openness and macroeconomic policy outcomes on agricultural and industrial sector incomes per capita and total trade. The findings tended to show that the fortunes of these sectors deteriorated contrary to the assertion that a positive relationship exists between liberalization and poverty reduction via improved productivity of labor intensive smallholder farm and firms enterprises. While the apparent growth in total trade seemed to be buoyed by positive export supply shocks, deteriorating terms of trade and biased producer incentives structure penalized domestic manufactures and farming, thereby accentuating poverty. This adverse consequence is attributable to the adoption of import substitution industrialization strategy which encouraged the influx of foreign firms that are appendages of multinationals. In concluding, the paper calls for a shift in policy approach to economic development from the pervasive import substitution trade strategies which tended to displace labor to an export led strategy guided by the doctrine of factor endowments.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Poverty and employment impact of trade liberalization in Nigeria: empirical evidence and policy implications|
|English Title:||Poverty and employment impact of trade liberalization in Nigeria: empirical evidence and policy implications|
|Keywords:||Trade liberalization; Employment; Poverty reduction|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
|Depositing User:||Emmanuel Dele Balogun|
|Date Deposited:||05. Sep 2012 14:09|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 18:13|
Anderson, K., J. Francois, T. W. Hertel, B. Hoekman, and W.Martin. 2000. Potential gains from trade reform in the new millennium. Paper for the third annual conference on Global Economic Analysis, Monash University, Mont Eliza, Australia.
Anderson, K., W. Martin, and D. Van der Mensbrugghe. 2005. Market and welfare implications of Doha reform scenarios. In K. Anderson and W. Martin, eds., Trade reform and the Doha Agenda. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Beghin, J. C., and D. Van der Mensbrugghe. 2004. Global agricultural reform: What is at stake? In M. A. Aksoy and J. C. Beghin, eds., Global agricultural trade and developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Bouët, A. 2006. What can the poor expect from trade liberalization? Opening the black box. MTID Discussion Paper No. 93. IFPRI, Washington, DC.
Bouët, A., S. Mevel, and D. Orden. 2005. More or less ambition? Modeling the development impact of US-EU agricultural proposals in the Doha round. Brief. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
CBN (Various Years) Annual Report and Statement of Account, CBN, Abuja.
Cline, W. R. 2004. Trade policy and global poverty. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Dee, P., and K. Hanslow. 2000. Multilateral liberalisation of services trade. Staff Research Paper. Canberra: Australia Productivity Commission.
Dessus, S., K. Fukasaku, and R. Safadi. 1999. La liberalization multilaterale des droits de douane et les pays en développement. Cahier de Politique Economique no. 18. Paris: Centre de Développement de l’OCDE. Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham
Francois, J., H. Van Meijl, and F. Van Tongeren. 2005. Trade liberalization in the Doha development round. Economic Policy 20, no. 42: 349–391.
Hertel, T. W., and R. Keeney. 2005. What’s at stake: The relative importance of import barriers, export subsidies and domestic support. In T. Hertel and L. A. Winters, eds., Putting development back into the Doha Agenda: Poverty impacts of a WTO agreement. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Milner, C., and P. Wright (1998). Modelling labour market adjustment to trade liberalization in an industrializing economy. Economic Journal 108, March: 509-528.
National Bureau of Statistics (2010), Nigeria: Poverty Profile Report, Abuja
National Planning Commission (2009) Nigeria Vision 20: 2020; Economic Transformation Blueprint, Abuja.
Rattso, J., and R. Torvik (1998). Zimbabwean trade liberalization: Ex post evaluation. Cambridge Journal of Economics 22: 325-346.
Winters, L. A., N. McCulloch, and A. McKay. 2004. Trade liberalization and poverty: The evidence so far. Journal of Economic Literature 42 (March): 72–115.
World Bank. 2002. Global economic prospects and the developing countries: Making world trade work for the world’s poor. Washington, DC.
World Bank. 2004. Global economic prospects: Realizing the development promise of the Doha Agenda. Washington, DC.