Hirota, Haruaki and Yunoue, Hideo (2012): Local government expenditure and council size: Quasi-experimental evidence from Japan.
Download (1907Kb) | Preview
In order to evaluate a fiscal common-pool problem, this paper focuses on the relationship between local government council size and its expenditure. Generally, local councilors internalize the benefit of public projects targeted at their political jurisdictions, but underestimate and prefer to externalize the cost of public projects due to the national subsidy system. When council sizes become larger, their expenditure might be larger because of the selfish behavior of local council members. This paper estimates the positive effect of local council size on local government expenditure using a dataset of 13,989 municipalities in Japan over a period of 6 years. In Japan, local council size is a deterministic and discontinuous function of municipal population size under legal rules. We pay attention to this exogenous discontinuity and apply a regression discontinuity design to consider an endogeneity bias. The results show that the larger the size of the local council the larger the size of expenditure they undertake. In particular, we find that growing small municipalities tend to increase their expenditures, so that for example, 1% increases in local council size lead to about 1.2% increases of expenditures by small municipalities. Our results show that the fiscal common-pool problem is produced in small municipalities.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Local government expenditure and council size: Quasi-experimental evidence from Japan|
|Keywords:||fiscal common-pool problem; local council size; government expenditure; regression discontinuity design|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
|Depositing User:||Haruaki Hirota|
|Date Deposited:||24. Nov 2012 17:58|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 15:14|
Acemoglu, D., 2005. Constitutions, politics, and economics: A review essay on Persson and Tabellini’s ‘The Economic Effects of Constitutions,’ Journal of Economic Literature 43, 1025–1048.
Angrist, J.D., Pischke, J-S., 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Baqir, R., 2002. Districting and government overspending, Journal of Political Economy 110, 1318–1354.
Bessho S., 2010. Fiscal discipline and commitment, The Journal of the Board of Audit. 42, 29–47 (In Japanese).
Bradbury, J.C., Crain, W.M., 2001. Legislative organization and government spending: Cross-country evidence, Journal of Public Economics 82, 309–325.
Bradbury, J. C. and Stephenson, F. 2003. Local government structure and public expenditures. Public Choice, 115, pp.185–198.
Egger, P. and Koethenbuerger, M. 2010. Government spending and legislative organization: Quasi-experimental evidence from Germany. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 4, pp.200–212.
Gilligan, T. and J. Matsusaka 1995. Deviations from constituent interest: the role of legislative structure and political parties in the States. Economic Inquiry, 33, pp.383–401.
Gilligan, T. and J. Matsusaka 2001. Fiscal policy, legislatures size, and political parties: evidence from state and local governments in the first half of the 20th century. National Tax Journal, 35, pp.57–82.
Hirota, Haruaki and Yunoue, Hideo 2011. Do municipal mergers affect local council expenditures? Evidence from municipal mergers in Japan. Annual Journal of Japanese Local Public Finance, 18, pp.62–84. (In Japanese)
Imbens, G.W. and Lemieux, T. 2008. Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice, Journal of Econometrics, 142, 2, pp.615–635.
Kirchgässner, Gebhard 2002. The Effect of fiscal institutions on public finance: A survey of the empirical evidence, in: S.L. Winer, H. Shibata (eds.), Political Economy and Public Finance, Cheltenham, pp. 145–177.
Kontopoulos, Y. and Perotti, R. 1999. Government fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes: evidence from OECD countries. NBER Chapters, in: Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, pp.81–102 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Lee, D. S. and Lemieux, T. 2010. Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature 48, pp.281–355.
Lee, M. J. 2005. Micro-Econometrics for Policy, Program, and Treatment Effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G 1999. The size and scope of government: Comparative politics with rational politicians. European Economic Review, 43, pp.699–735.
Persson, T., and Tabellini, G. 2000. Political economics: explaining economic policy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Pettersson-Lidbom, P. 2012. Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? Evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Public Economics, 96, pp.269–278.
Schaltegger, C A. and Feld, L P. 2009. Do large cabinets favor large governments? Evidence on the fiscal commons problem for Swiss Cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 93, pp.35–47.
von Hagen, Jürgen. 2006. Political economy of fiscal institutions. In the Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, ed. Barry R. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman, pp.464–478.
Weingast, B.R., Shepsle, K. A. and Johnsen, C. 1981. The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 4, pp. 642–664.