Partnering universities and companies in Russia: effects of new government initiative

Dezhina, Irina and Simachev, Yuri (2012): Partnering universities and companies in Russia: effects of new government initiative.

Abstract

The paper presents the results of 2-year survey conducted in 2011-2012 among Russian universities and companies who jointly implement R&D projects aimed at development of high-tech manufacturing. The joint projects represent a new government instrument to stimulate the development of linkages between universities and companies by giving matching grants for R&D to companies with obligation to order R&D to a university-partner. The objectives of the survey included analysis of motivation for cooperation both from side of universities and companies; primary effects and side-effects of such initiative; changes that may be introduced to the government regulations concerning matching grants. Total 38 teams were surveyed. Our findings show that major motivations from side of universities were access to new practical research tasks from companies, selection of most competitive teams of researchers capable to work with companies, and strengthening reputation in business environment. Companies were interested in getting government funding in order to solve their technological problems; to strengthen, due cooperation with universities, their research capacity, and to use modern research infrastructure located at universities. The analysis allowed identification of the major effects of the matching grants mechanism. They included: strengthening of university orientation towards solving practical tasks which are of interest to business; institutionalization of relations between universities and business in the sphere of innovation activity; broadening of research cooperation and the formation of research consortiums; harmonization of research and educational tasks in universities, and orientation of the parties towards continuing cooperation in the innovation sphere.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: STI policy evaluation, public R&D subsidies, matching grants, university-industry linkages, behavioral additionality, innovations
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1992). A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.

Alonso-Borrego, C., Galan-Zazo, G., Forcadell, F., Zuniga-Vicente, A. (2012). Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment : a survey. Economics Working Papers 12-15, Universidad Carlos III, Departamento de Economia.

Aschhoff, B. (2009). The effect of subsidies on R&D investment and success: do subsidy history and size matter? ZEW Discussion Paper 09-032, Mannheim.

Bach, L., Mats, M. (2005). From economic foundations to S&T policy tools: a comparative analysis of the dominant paradigms. In M. Matt & P. Llerena (eds), Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag

Berube, C., Mohnen, M. (2007). Are Firms That Received R&D Subsidies More Innovative? CIRANO Working Paper 2007s-13, CIRANO.

Catozzella, A., Vivarelli, M. (2011). Assessing the Impact of Public Support on Innovative Productivity. DISCE Working Paper 77. Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche.

Cerulli, G., Poti, B. (2010), The differential impact of privately and publicly funded R&D on R&D investment and innovation: the Italian case. Working Papers 10, Doctoral School of Economics, Sapienza University of Rome.

Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Mustar, P. (2009). Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy, 38, 1517-1533.

Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K. (2004). The Link between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance. ZEW Discussion Paper 04-56, Mannheim.

Czarnitzki, D., Licht, G. (2006). Additionality of Public R&D Grants in a Transition Economy: The Case of Eastern Germany. Economics of Transition, 14 (1), 101–131.

Czarnitzki, D., Toole, A.A. (2007). Business R&D and the interplay of R&D subsidies and product market uncertainty. Review of Industrial Organization 31(3), 169–181.

Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., Fier, A. (2007). The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (7), 1347–1366.

Czarnitzki, D., Bento, C. (2011). Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper 11-053, Mannheim.

David, P., Hall, B., Toole, A. (2000). Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497-529.

Dezhina, I. (2011). Innovation Policy in Russia: Is it Successive, Balanced, Effective? //University Management: Practice and Analysis, 33, 7-18.

Falk, R. (2006). Measuring the Effects of Public Support Schemes on Firms’ Innovation Activities. WIFO Working Paper, Austrian Institute of Economic Research, Vienna.

Goldberg, I., Gobbard, G., Racin, J. (2011). Igniting innovation: rethinking the role of government in emerging Europe and Central Asia. World Bank, Washington DC.

Grossman, G., Helpman, E. (1991). Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.

Guellec, D., y Van Pottlesberghe, B. (2003). The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 12 (3), 225-244.

Hall, B.H., Maffiolly A. (2008). Evaluating the Impact of Technology Development Funds in Emerging Economies: Evidence form Latin America. NBER Working Paper 13835, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Howitt, P. (1999). Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715-730.

Klette, T., Moen, J., Griliches, Z. (2000). Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Micro Econometric Evaluation Studies. Research Policy, 29, 471-495.

Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., Dinopoulos, E. (1990). A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-1092.

Segerstrom, P. (2000). The Long-Run Growth Effects of R&D Subsidies. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 277-305.

Simachev, Yu., Yakovlev, A., Kuznetsov, B., Gorst, M., Daniltsev, A., Kuzyk, M., Smirnov, S. (2009). An Assessment of Policy Measures to Support Russia's Real Economy. Working Papers of the Research Centre for East European Studies 102, Bremen.

Simachev, Yu., Kuzyk, M., Ivanov, D. (2012). Russian development institutions: The rise and main challenges on the path towards improvement of their performance. MPRA Paper 40851.

Takalo, T., Tanayama, T., Toivanen, O. (2008). Evaluating innovation policy: a structural treatment effect model of R&D subsidies. Research Discussion Papers 7/2008, Bank of Finland.

Teubal, M. (1996). R&D and technology policy in NICs as learning processes. World Development, 24 (3), 449-460.

Teubal, M. (2002). What is the systems perspective to Innovation and Technology Policy (ITP) and how can we apply it to developing and newly industrialized economies? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12 (1), 233-257.

Zasimova, L., Kuznetsov, B., Kuzyk, M., Simachev, Yu., Chulok, A. (2008). Problemy Perekhoda Promyshlennosti na Put’ Innovatsionnogo Razvitiya (Problems of Switching Industry to Innovation-Driven Path). Scientific Reports: Independent Economic Analysis Series, Paper No. 201. – Moscow: MONF (Moskovskiy Obshchestvennyy Nauchnyy Fond).

Wallsten, S. (2000). The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 82-100.

Wanzenbock, I., Scherngell, T., Manfred, F. (2011). How do distinct firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Empirical evidence from a binary regression analysis. ERSA conference paper, European Regional Science Association.