Dai, Lili and Ngo, Phong T. H. (2013): Political Uncertainty and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from the U.S. Presidential Election Cycle.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_44283.pdf Download (248kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Election periods are associated with uncertainty about future governmental structure and public policy, i.e., political uncertainty, leading to an increase in agency costs. As a response to rising agency costs, we find that in the year prior to a U.S. presidential election, accounting conservatism increases by nearly 20 percent. This election year effect is stronger when the election is closer, when the incumbent president is not seeking re-election, and when the incumbent party is Democrat. In the post-election year, conservatism is lower relative to the non-election period when the incumbent party wins, but remains higher under an opposition party victory. Moreover, the election year effect varies across industries and companies, and remains unchanged under different empirical specifications. These findings add to the literature on how political forces can shape the nature of financial reporting by showing that accounting conservatism is driven by political concerns.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Political Uncertainty and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from the U.S. Presidential Election Cycle |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | accounting conservatism, political uncertainty, election cycle |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G38 - Government Policy and Regulation G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G34 - Mergers ; Acquisitions ; Restructuring ; Corporate Governance D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior |
Item ID: | 44283 |
Depositing User: | Phong T. H. Ngo |
Date Deposited: | 08 Feb 2013 12:01 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2019 06:32 |
References: | Ahmed, A., and S. Duellman. 2007. Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43 (2–3): 411–437. Alesina, A. 1987. Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102 (3): 651–678. Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 83–128. ———, and ———. 2006. The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely gain and loss recognition. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (2): 207–242. Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 3–37. Belo, F., V. D. Gala , and J. Li. 2012. Government spending, political cycles, and the cross section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming). Blanchard, O., and M. Kremer. 1997. Disorganization. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1091–1126. Boutchkova, M., H. Doshi, A. Durnev, and A. Molchanov. 2012. Precarious politics and return volatility. Review of Financial Studies 25 (4): 1111–1154. Brogaard, J., and A. Detzel. 2012. The asset pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Working Paper, University of Washington. Brown, C. O., and I. S. Dinc. 2005. The politics of bank failure: Evidence from emerging markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4): 1413–1444. Chaney, P. K., M. Faccio, and D. Parsley. 2011. The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 51 (1–2): 58–76. Dinc, I. S. 2005. Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging countries. Journal of Financial Economics 77 (2): 453–479. Drazen, A. 2000. The political business cycle after 25 years. National Bureau of Economic Research Macroeconomics Annual 15: 75–117. Faccio, M. 2006. Politically connected firms. American Economic Review 96 (1): 369–386. ———, R. Masulis, and J. McConnell. 2006. Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance 61: 2597–2635. Friedman, E. 2012. Romney calls for Obamacare pepeal as ‘bad law’. ABC News Blogs, Jun 28, 2012. García Lara, J. M., B. García Osma, and F. Penalva. 2009. Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies 14 (1): 161–201. Gelman, A., and G. King. 1990. Estimating the incumbency advantage without bias. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 1142–1164. Goh, B. W., and D. Li. 2011. Internal controls and conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review 86 (3): 975–1005. Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metric. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 107–155. Guay, W. 2010. Discussion of elections and discretionary accruals: Evidence from 2004. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (2): 477–87. Ingersoll, J. E., and S. A. Ross. 1992. Waiting to invest: investment and uncertainty. Journal of Business 65 (1): 1–29. Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76 (2): 323–329. Johnson, S., and T. Mitton 2003. Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics 67: 351–382. Julio, B., and Y. Yook. 2012. Political uncertainty and corporate investment cycles. Journal of Finance 67 (1): 45–84. Khan, M., and R. Watts 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48: 132-150 Khimm, S. 2012. Romney vows to repeal Dodd-Frank. The law’s biggest critics doubt that will happen. The Washington Post, Wonkblog, August 10, 2012. Kido, N., R. Petacchi, and J. Weber. 2012. The influence of elections on the accounting choices of governmental entities. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (2): 443–476. LaFond, R., and S. Roychowdhury. 2008. Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (1): 101–135. ———, and R. L. Watts. 2008. The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review 83 (2): 447–478. Lent, L. V. 2012. Discussion of the influence of elections on the accounting choices of governmental entities. Journal of Accounting Research 50 (2): 477–494. McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. 1986. The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101 (4): 707–728. McGuire, S., T. Omer, and D. Wang. 2012. Tax avoidance: Does tax-specific industry expertise make a difference? The Accounting Review 87 (3): 975–1003. McRae, D. 1977. A political model of the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy 85 (2): 239–263. Murray, S. 2012. Romney, toughening stance, would repeal Sarbanes-Oxley. The Wall Street Journal Blogs, March 3, 2012. Nordhaus, W. D. 1975. The political business cycle. Review of Economic Studies 42 (2): 169–190. Ramanna, K. 2008. The implications of unverifiable fair-value accounting: Evidence from the political economy of goodwill accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45 (2–3): 253–81. ———, and S. Roychowdhury. 2010. Elections and discretionary accruals: Evidence from 2004. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (2): 445–75. Rogoff, K., and A. Sibert. 1988. Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Review of Economic Studies 55 (1): 1–16. Santa-Clara, P., and R. Valkanov. 2003. The presidential puzzle: Political cycles and the stock market. Journal of Finance 58 (5): 1841–1872. Shu, S. 2000. Auditor resignations: Clientele effects and legal liability. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (2): 173–205. Smith, C., and R. L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32 (3): 263–292. Tirole, J. 2001. Corporate governance. Econometrica 69 (1): 1–35. Watts, R. L. 2003a. Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17 (3): 207–221. ———. 2003b. Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons 17 (4): 287–301. ———, and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 112–134. ———, and ———. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44283 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Political Uncertainty and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from the U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. (deposited 07 Jan 2013 03:56)
- Political Uncertainty and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from the U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. (deposited 08 Feb 2013 12:01) [Currently Displayed]
- Political Uncertainty and Accounting Conservatism: Evidence from the U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. (deposited 15 Jan 2013 06:47)