Puissance et Coopération dans les Relations économiques internationales

GAOMBALET, Célestin Guy-Serge (2020): Puissance et Coopération dans les Relations économiques internationales.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify not only the contours of power, asymmetric domination or stato-centrism in global economic governance, but also to analyze the scope of international cooperation or regimes (IR) in international economic relations (REI). For this fact, it combines the concepts of economic analysis and those of international political economy (PPE) in order to understand what order is, that is to say stability or absence order or anarchy in REIs. This study is also interested in the different ways of analyzing the play of the actors (States, International organizations, firms, NGOs, Groups of experts, etc.) who intervene in international negotiations. It also makes it possible to show the importance and the difficulties encountered by the World Trade Organization (WTO) as a deus ex machina, that is to say, an external player in the regulation and regulation of international trade.

In addition, with the profusion of regional economic integration processes (IER) in the world, the proliferation of Regional Economic Communities (RECs) in Africa and the networking of national economic structures through Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs), are we entitled to support the power or cooperation-centered approach to PPE? In response, we believe that in the current context where the global economy is increasingly integrated, cooperation stands out from the hegemon. This thesis is supported by the WTO regime, the main principles of which are negotiation, regulation and dispute resolution. This triptych of the multilateral trading system can only be achieved within the framework of cooperation where the absence of a regime is no longer an option.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Power and cooperation in international economic relations
• Language: French
• Keywords: Power – Cooperation - International economic relations - Global governance - International political economy
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F42 - International Policy Coordination and Transmission; H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H87 - International Fiscal Issues ; International Public Goods; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O19 - International Linkages to Development ; Role of International Organizations

References

Ouvrages et articles

1.Axelrod R. [1984], “The Evolution of Cooperation”, Basic Books, Inc., Publishers, New York.

2.Bagwell Kyle, Staiger Robert [1999], An Economic Theory of the GATT, American Economic Review, 89(1), 215-254 et “What do Trade Negotiators Negotiate about? Empirical Evidence from World Trade Organization”, American Economic Review, 101(4), 1238-1273.

3.Berthaud P. et Kébabdjan G. [2006], La question politique en économie internationale, Paris, La découverte, coll. « Recherches », pp.202-203.

4.Gilbert R. Winham, [2007], “The Doha Round and its Impact on the WTO”, dans Rorden Wilkinson, Donna Lee (eds.), The WTO after Hong Kong. Progress and Prospects for the Doha Development Agenda, London, Routledge, 2007.

5.Keohane R. O. [1984], After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton UP. pp. 51-52

6.Kindleberger C. P. [1986], “International Public Goods without International Government”, American Economic Review, vol. 76, n° 1, March, pp. 1-13

7.Krugman P. R. [1995], “Growing World Trade. Causes and Consequences”, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, n°1 pp.327-362.

8.Love P. et Lattimore R. [2009], “Les cycles de négociations commerciales et l'OMC “, dans International Trade : Free, Fair and Open?, Éditions OCDE, Paris, p.90

9.OMC. [2019], "Examen statistique du commerce mondial", Secrétariat général OMC, Genève. p.55.

10.OMC. [2019], https://www.wto.org/french/tratop_f/dispu_f/find_dispu_cases_f.htm, Règlement des différends.

11.Abbas M. [2005], "L’Organisation mondiale du commerce : l’ère des rendements décroissants", Asymétries, (1), janvier, pp. 20-23.

12.Najam A. [2006], Global Environmental Governance: A Reform Agenda, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), p.114

13.Ney J. S. Jr. [1990], Soft Power, Foreign Policy No. 80, Twentieth Anniversary (Autumn, 1990), pp. 153-171 (19 pages), Slate Group, LLC.

14.Reuters [2018], “Point marchés-Wall Street monte, détente avec la Chine et M&A en soutien“ téléchargeable sur https://fr.reuters.com/article/frEuroRpt/idFRL5N1SS2HG

15.Snidal D. [1985], The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory, International Organization.

16.Snidal D. [1985], The Game Theory of International Politics, in World Politics Vol. 38

17.Stein A. [1983], Coordination and Collaboration. Regimes in an Anarchic World, in Krasner S.

18.UE. [2018], “Discours du Président de la commission européenne au EU-China Business Summit “ juillet. téléchargeable sur https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/fr/SPEECH_18_4543

19.Wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_des_sept_(%C3%A9conomie) (Consulté le 20 décembre 2019)

Bases de données et sites consultés

- https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/USA/Year/2008/TradeFlow/EXPIMP/Partner/ECS/Product/All-Groups

- https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ext_lt_maineu&lang=fr

- https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1108501/etats-unis-chine-tarifs-guerre-commerce-deficits

- https://fr.statista.com/statistiques/571512/valeur-des-exportations-des-etats-unis-vers-la-chine-de-2004-a/

- https://oec.world/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/export/usa/mex/show/2008/