Measuring the effect of farmland preservation on farm profitability

Schilling, Brian J. and Attavanich, Witsanu and Sullivan, Kevin P. and Marxen, Lucas J. (2014): Measuring the effect of farmland preservation on farm profitability. Published in: Land Use Policy , Vol. 41, (November 2014): pp. 84-96.

Abstract

Purchase of development rights (PDR) programs have been created in 27 states to preserve farmland resources. These programs seek to advance several societal objectives, including the protection of farmland from development, retention of rural amenities, and promotion of the economic viability of farming. Using New Jersey farm-level data, this study evaluates whether participation in a state PDR program improves farm profitability. The propensity score matching method is used to correct for selection bias arising from the voluntary nature of these programs. No statistically significant profit differential is found between preserved and observationally equivalent unpreserved farms in our full sample of 4029 farms. When the analysis is replicated across different farm types, we find weak evidence that the profitability of preserved residential lifestyle/retirement farms is lower than that observed for their unpreserved equivalents. In contrast, we find that small farms (<$100,000 in annual sales) operated by individuals for whom farming is a principal occupation earn $414 to $436 more per acre in profit than their observationally equivalent unpreserved counterparts.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Farmland preservation; Purchase of development rights; Agricultural land use policy; Program evaluation; Farm profitability; Propensity score matching
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy

References

Abadie, A., Imbens, G.W. 2008. On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76 (6), 1537-1557.

———. 2006. Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74 (1), 235-267.

Adelaja, A., Sullivan, K., Hailu, Y. 2011. Endogenizing the planning horizon in urban fringe agriculture. Land Use Policy 28 (1), 66-75.

American Farmland Trust. 2012. Status of state PACE programs. Farmland Information Center, MA.

———. 2011b. Fact sheet status of local PACE programs. Farmland Information Center, MA.

Anderson, K., Weinhold, D. 2008. Valuing future development rights: The costs of conservation easements. Ecological Economics 68 (1), 437-446.

Becker, S.O., Ichino, A. 2002. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal 2 (4), 358-377.

Bergstrom, J., Russell, R., Ready, R. 2009. What have we learned from over 20 years of farmland amenity valuation research in North America? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 31 (1), 21-49.

Berry, D. 1978. Effects of suburbanization on agricultural activities. Growth and Change 9 (3), 28.

Bromley, D.W., Hodge, I. 1990. Private property rights and presumptive policy entitlements: Reconsidering the premises of rural policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 17 (2), 197.

Burchell, R., Downs, A., McCann, B., Mukherji, S. 2005. Sprawl costs: Economic impacts of unchecked development. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Caliendo, M., Kopeinig, S. 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys 22 (1), 31-72.

Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. 1988. Long-term viability of U.S. agriculture. The Ohio State University.

Crump, R.K., Hotz, V.J., Imbens, G.W., Mitnik, O.A. 2009. Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 96 (1), 187-199.

Danborn, D. 1996. Why Americans value rural life. Rural Development Perspectives 12 (1), 15-18.

Daniels, T., Lapping, M. 2001. Farmland preservation in America and the issue of critical mass. Paper presented at the American Farmland Trust National Conference, Chicago, IL.

Daniels, T., Bowers, D. 1997. Holding our ground: Protecting America’s farms and farmland. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Dehejia, R.H., Wahba, S. 2002. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (1), 151-161.

———. 1999. Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (448), 1053-1062.

Dimitri, C., Effland, A., Conklin, N. 2005. The 20th century transformation of U.S. agriculture and farm policy. USDA-ERS Economic Information Bulletin No. 3.

Duke, J.M., Ilvento, T.W. 2004a. A conjoint analysis of public preferences for agricultural land preservation. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33 (2), 209-219.

Duke, J.M., Ilvento, T.W. 2004b. Supplying preservation: Landowner behavior and the Delaware agricultural lands preservation program. Department of Food and Resource Economics, Research Report RR04-01, University of Delaware.

Echeverria, J. 2005. Regulating versus paying land owners to protect the environment. Journal of Land, Resources and Environmental Law 26 (1), 1-46.

Esseks, J.D., Schilling, B. 2013. Impacts of the Federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program: an assessment based on interviews with participating landowners. American Farmland Trust and The Center for Great Plains Studies University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Fischel, W. 1982. The urbanization of agricultural land: A review of the National Agricultural Lands Study. Land Economics 58 (2), 236-259.

Fodor, E. 1999. Better, not bigger. Gabriola Island, British Columbia: New Catalyst Books.

Gardner, B.D. 1977. The economics of agricultural land preservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (5), 1027-1036.

Ghelfi, L., McGranahan, D. 2004. One in five rural counties depends on farming. Amber Waves 2 (3), 11.

Gottlieb, P.D. 2002. Growth without growth: An alternative economic development goal for metropolitan areas. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program, Statistical Survey Series.

Green, D. M., and J. A. Swets. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Vol. 1974 Wiley New York.

Heckman, J.J, Ichimura, H., Smith, J., Todd, P. 1998. Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 1017-1098.

Heckman, J.J., Ichimura, H., Todd, P.E. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 605-654.

Heimlich, R., Anderson, W.D. 2001. Development at the urban fringe and beyond: Impacts on agriculture and rural land. In Economic Research Service Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

Hellerstein, D., Nickerson, C.J., Feather, P., Gadsby, D., Mullarkey, D., Tegene, A., Barnard, C. 2002. Farmland protection: The role of public preferences for rural amenities. Agricultural Economic Report No. AER815. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

Heckman, J.J., LaLonde, R.J., Smith, J.A. 1999. The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. Handbook of Labor Economics 3, 1865-2097.

Ichino, A., Mealli, F., Nannicini, T. 2008. From temporary help jobs to permanent employment: What can we learn from matching estimators and their sensitivity? Journal of Applied Econometrics 23 (3), 305-327.

Jackson-Smith, D., Jensen, E. 2009. Agricultural importance versus farm dependence: A new typology. Rural Sociology 74(1), 37-55.

Jackson-Smith, D., Sharp, J. 2008. Farming in the urban shadow: Supporting agriculture at the rural-urban interface. Rural Realities 2 (4), 1-12.

Kline, J., Wichelns, D. 1996. Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs. Land Economics 72 (4), 538-549.

Libby, L. 1974. Land use policy: Implications for commercial agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 55 (1), 1143-1152.

Libby, L. 2005. Rural land use problems and policy options: Overview from a U.S. perspective. In Land Use Problems and Conflicts: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions., eds. S. Goetz, J. Shortle, and J. Bergstrom, Routledge, New York.

Lisansky, J. 1986. Farming in an urbanizing environment: Agricultural land use conflicts and right to farm. Human Organization 45 (4), 363-371.

Liu, X., Lynch, L. 2011. Do agricultural land preservation programs reduce farmland loss? evidence from a propensity score matching estimator. Land Economics 87 (2), 183-201.

———. 2011. Do zoning regulations rob rural landowners' equity? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (1), 1-25.

Lobao, L., Meyer, K. 2001. The great agricultural transition: Crisis, change and social consequences for twentieth century U.S. farming. The Annual Review of Sociology 27, 103-124.

Lopez, R.A., Adelaja, A., Andrews, M. 1988. The effects of suburbanization on agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (2), 346-358.

Lopez, R.A., Shah, F.A., Altobello, M.A. 1994. Amenity benefits and the optimal allocation of land. Land Economics, 53-62.

Lynch, L. 2007. Economic benefits of farmland preservation. In The economic benefits of land conservation., ed. Constance T. F. de Brun, 13-23. The Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA.

Lynch, L., Carpenter, J. 2003. Is there evidence of a critical mass in the Mid-Atlantic agricultural sector between 1949 and 1997? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32, 116-128.

Lynch, L., Duke, J.M. 2007. Economic benefits of farmland preservation: Evidence from the United States. Working Papers.

Lynch, L., Gray, W., Geoghegan, J. 2010. An evaluation of working land and open space preservation programs in Maryland: Are they paying too much? In New perspectives on agri-environmental policies: A multidisciplinary and transatlantic approach., eds. Stephan Goetz, Floor Brouwer. New York: Routledge.

———. 2007. Are farmland preservation program easement restrictions capitalized into farmland prices? what can a propensity score matching analysis tell us? Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 29 (3), 502-509.

Lynch, L., Liu, X. 2007. Impact of designated preservation areas on rate of preservation and rate of conversion: Preliminary evidence. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (5), 1205-1210.

Lynch, L., Lovell, S.J. 2003. Combining spatial and survey data to explain participation in agricultural land reservation programs. Land Economics 79 (2), 259-276.

Nickerson, C.J., Hellerstein, D. 2003. Protecting rural amenities through farmland preservation programs. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32 (1), 129-144.

Nickerson, C.J., Lynch, L. 2001. The effect of farmland preservation programs on farmland prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 341-351.

Oberholtzer, L., Clancy, K., Esseks, J. 2010. The future of farming on the urban edge: Insights from fifteen U.S. counties about farmland protection and farm viability. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems and Community Development 1 (2), 59-76.

Rosenbaum, P.R. 2002. Observational studies. Springer Verlag.

———. 1987. Sensitivity analysis for certain permutation inferences in matched observational studies. Biometrika 74 (1), 13-26.

Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B. 1983a. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1), 41-55.

———. 1983b. Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Series B (Methodological): 212-218.

Rudel, T., O'Neill, K., Gottlieb, P., McDermott, M., Hatfield, C. 2011. From middle to upper class sprawl? Land use controls and changing patterns of real estate development in northern New Jersey. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (3), 1-16.

SADC, "New Jersey Farmland Preservation Program: State, County and Municipally Preserved Farmland" State of New Jersey, Department of Agriculture, NJ, 2012), http://www.nj.gov/agriculture/sadc/farmpreserve/progress/preserved/preservedfarmslist.pdf (accessed May 4, 2012).

Schilling, B., Sullivan, K., Duke, J. 2013. Do residual development options increase preserved farmland values? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 38 (3), 327-343.

Schilling, B.J. 2009. Local planning for agriculture: A new charge to the planning profession. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.

Silverman, B.W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.

Smith, J.A., Todd, P.E. 2005. Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics 125 (1), 305-353.

Sokolow, A. 2006. A national view of agricultural easement programs: measuring success in protecting farmland - report 4. American Farmland Trust and Agricultural Issues Center, University of California.

Sorensen, A., Greene, R., Russ, K. 1997. Farming on the edge. American Farmland Trust, Center for Agriculture in the Environment.

Uematsu, H., Mishra, A. 2012. Organic farmers or conventional farmers: Where's the money? Ecological Economics 78 (C), 55-62.

USDA-NASS. 2009. 2007 Census of Agriculture, State-level data. Washington, DC.

USDA. 2009. Summary report: 2007 National Resources Inventory, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.