Interest Rate Pegging, Fluctuations, and Fiscal Policy in China

Tong, Bing and Yang, Guang (2020): Interest Rate Pegging, Fluctuations, and Fiscal Policy in China.

Abstract

This paper proves in a New Keynesian model that interest rate pegging can explain the unusual business cycle fluctuations in China. It is traditional wisdom that when the nominal interest rate is inflexible, there is no unique equilibrium in macroeconomic models. We prove that a unique equilibrium exists if the nominal rate is pegged for a limited period, after which it switches to a flexible rate regime. The peg alters the propagation of external shocks, magnifies volatility of endogenous variables, and leads to instability of the economy. Besides, the model becomes more unstable when the peg duration extends, and when the pegged rate deviates from steady state. At the same time, fiscal multiplier increases under the peg, indicating fiscal policy may be more effective in mitigating economic fluctuations when monetary policy is restricted by interest rate pegging.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: New Keynesian model; Chinese economy; Interest rate peg; Fiscal policy; Rational expectation
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E31 - Price Level ; Inflation ; Deflation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E43 - Interest Rates: Determination, Term Structure, and Effects; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

Blake, A. P. (2012). Fixed interest rates over finite horizons. Bank of England working paper.

Blanchard, O. J., & Kahn, C. M. (1980). The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, (pp. 1305–1311).

Carlstrom, C. T., Fuerst, T. S., & Paustian, M. (2014). Fiscal multipliers under an interest rate peg of deterministic versus stochastic duration. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46, 1293–1312.

Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P. J., & McGrattan, E. R. (2000). Sticky price models of the business cycle: can the contract multiplier solve the persistence problem? Econometrica, 68, 1151–1179. Chen, K., Higgins, P., Waggoner, D., & Zha, T. (2016). China’s pro-growth monetary policy and its asymmetric transmission mechanism. Technical Report Working Paper 2016-9a, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.

Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., & Rebelo, S. (2011). When is the government spending multiplier large? Journal of Political Economy, 119, 78–121.

Christiano, L. J., Motto, R., & Rostagno, M. (2003). The great depression and the friedman-schwartz hypothesis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35.

Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., & Evans, C. L. (2005). Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of political Economy, 113, 1–45.

Clarida, R., Gali, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). The science of monetary policy: a new keynesian perspective. Journal of economic literature, 37, 1661–1707.

Cogan, J. F., Cwik, T., Taylor, J. B., & Wieland, V. (2010). New keynesian versus old keynesian government spending multipliers. Journal of Economic dynamics and control, 34, 281–295.

Del Negro, M., Giannoni, M. P., & Patterson, C. (2015). The forward guidance puzzle. FRB of New York Staff Report, . 31

Drautzburg, T., & Uhlig, H. (2015). Fiscal stimulus and distortionary taxation. Review of Economic Dynamics, 18, 894–920.

Dupor, B., & Li, R. (2015). The expected inflation channel of government spending in the postwar US. European Economic Review, 74, 36–56.

Eggertsson, G. B. (2006). Fiscal multipliers and policy coordination.

Eggertsson, G. B. (2010). The paradox of toil. Technical Report.

Eggertsson, G. B., & Woodford, M. (2003). The zero bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1,212–227.

Gali, J. (2009). Constant interest rate projections without the curse of indeterminacy:A note. International Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 61–68.

Gali, J. (2011). Are central banks’ projections meaningful? Journal of Monetary Economics, 58, 537–550.

Hall, R. E. et al. (2009). By how much does gdp rise if the government buys more output? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 40, 183–249.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of interest, employment and money.

Krugman, P. R. (1998). It’s baaack: Japan’s slump and the return of the liquidity trap. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1998, 137–205.

Laseen, S., & Svensson, L. E. (2011). Anticipated alternative policy rate paths in policy simulations. The International Journal of Central Banking,7, 1–35.

Li, B., & Liu, Q. (2017). On the choice of monetary policy rules for china:A bayesian dsge approach. China Economic Review, 44, 166–185.

Liu, Z., Wang, P., & Xu, Z. (2020). Interest-rate liberalization and capital misallocations. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.

Lucas, R. E. (1983). Studies in business-cycle theory. MIT Press.

McCallum, B. T. (1981). Price level determinacy with an interest rate policy rule and rational expectations. Journal of Monetary Economics, 8, 319–329.

Sargent, T. J., & Wallace, N. (1975). “Rational” expectations, the optimal monetary instrument, and the optimal money supply rule. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 241–254.

Taylor, J. B. (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. In Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (pp. 195–214). Elsevier volume 39.

Taylor, J. B. (2000). Using monetary policy rules in emerging market economies. Stanford University Research Papers.

Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. princeton university press.

Woodford, M. (2011). Simple analytics of the government expenditure multiplier. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 3, 1–35.

Xie, P., & Luo, X. (2002). Taylor rule and its empirical test in china’s monetary policy. Economic Research Journal, 3, (in Chinese).

Yun, T. (1996). Nominal price rigidity, money supply endogeneity, and business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, 345–370.

Zhang, W. (2009). China’s monetary policy: Quantity versus price rules.Journal of Macroeconomics, 31, 473–484.