Malakhov, Sergey (2020): Proof of the invisible hand: the optimal consumer allocation of time under price dispersion.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_101943.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The analysis of the static labor-search-leisure model discovers some special optimality properties of the consumer choice under price dispersion. If the consumer is realistic about what he can buy with his efforts, the unit elasticity of his labor and search efforts with respect to consumption reproduces his initial consumption-leisure trade-off; it results in the equality of the marginal loss on search with its marginal benefit and the optimal consumption-leisure choice for any quantity purchased. The inequality of the marginal values of search, described by the satisficing approach, doesn’t take place, because this inequality represents the reproduction of the corner prior expectations by the same unit elasticity rule. If the consumer challenges the initial corner solution and start to work and to search, the unit elasticity rule reproduces high prior expectations and the following outcome produces the disappointment. As a result, the consumer either buys satisfactorily as well as optimally under the equality of the marginal values of search, or he quits the market without purchase. In this way the unit elasticity rule provides a powerful illustration of the consistency of consumer’s preferences. The consumer avoids the computational complexity of the marginal analysis because the unit elasticity rule automatically reproduces his realistic prior expectations of how much leisure should be given up for consumption. However, the unit elasticity rule provides the optimality of the total efforts and tells nothing about their distribution between labor and search. But this rule cannot work without the optimal consumer labor-search trade-off. It means that there is some inner market mechanism, which leads the producer along the production possibility frontier to make an offer that unintendently optimizes the consumer’s allocation of time. So to the consumer, it feels under the unit elasticity rule like the producer is more about being at the right place and the right time with a price, which summurizes optimally consumer’s efforts on purchase and in this way maximizes his consumption-leisure utility function. Generally, the phenomenon of the Invisible hand describes the unintended social benefits of individual self-interested actions. But used more narrowly, it refers to the quote, where Adam Smith speaks about the phenomenon, which leads self-interested producers to promote the public interest. And the unit elasticity rule provides the proof of the Invisible hand in this narrow meaning.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Proof of the invisible hand: the optimal consumer allocation of time under price dispersion |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | : invisible hand, optimal consumption-leisure choice, search, price dispersion, unit elasticity rule |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness |
Item ID: | 101943 |
Depositing User: | Sergey Malakhov |
Date Deposited: | 23 Jul 2020 02:19 |
Last Modified: | 23 Jul 2020 02:19 |
References: | Arrow, K. (1985) ‘The Potentials and Limits to the Market in Resource Allocation’, 107-124, ‘Issues in Contemporary Economics’, George R.Feiwel (eds.), Springer, 510 p. Baxley J.V, Moorhouse J.C. (1984) ‘Lagrange Multiplier Problems in Economics’ American Mathematical Monthly, 91, (7), 404–412. Grewal D., Marmorstein, H. (1994) 'Market Price Variation, Perceived Price Variation, and Consumers’ Price Search Decisions for Durable Goods.' Journal of Consumer Research, 21, (3), 453-460 Kapteyn, A., Wansbeek, T., Buyze, J. (1979) ‘Maximizing or Satisficing’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, (4), 549-563. Malakhov, S. (2003) ‘Transaction Costs, Economic Growth and Labor Supply',VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, 9,49-61. Malakhov, S. (2011). 'Towards a New Synthesis of Neoclassical Paradigm and Search – Satisficing Concept.' IAREP/SABE Annual Conference, Exeter, UK. Malakhov, S. (2015) ‘Propensity to Search: common, leisure, and labor models of behavior’, Expert Journal of Economics, 3(1),63-76 (http://economics.expertjournals.com/wp-content/uploads/EJE_308malakhov63-76.pdf) Malakhov, S. (2016a) 'Search and Home Production: do empirical studies of happiness overlook relative overconsumption?' Paper presented at the HEIRS International Conference, Rome 2016, March 15-16. Malakhov, S. (2016b) ‘Law of One Price and Optimal Consumption-Leisure Choice Under Price Dispersion’, Expert Journal of Economics,4(1),1-8. Malakhov, S. (2019) 'Willingness to Take Care of Good Cars: from the theorem of lemons to the Coase theorem', Paper presented at the 68th AFSE Congress, Orléans 2019, June 17-19. Malakhov, S. (2020a) 'Consumers' Diligence as a Natural Way to Copy with Externalities: from the Coase theorem to the invisible hand' Journal of Institutional Studies, 12(1), 38-65 Malakhov, S. (2020b) 'Deriving Utility: consumers’ diligence under externalities and technical progress,’ Paper presented at the 69th AFSE Congress, Lille 2020, June 10-12. (https://works.bepress.com/sergey_malakhov/21/) Malakhov, S. (2020c). Proof of the Invisible Hand: Why the satisficing purchase becomes optimal? Terra Economicus, 18(2), 70–94. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-70-94 Simon, H. (1972). 'Theories of Bounded Rationality. In: Decision and Organization.' C.B.Mcguire and Roy Radner (eds.), Nort-Holland Publishing Company, 161 – 176. Simon, H. (1978). 'Rationality as Process and as Product of Thought.' American Economic Review, 68(2), 1-16. Smith, A. (1976) ‘An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations’, R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner, W. B. Todd, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stahl, D. O. (1989) ‘Oligopolistic Pricing with Sequential Consumer Search’ American Economic Review, 79(4),700–712. Stigler, G. (1961) ‘The Economics of Information’, Journal of Political Economy, 69(3), 213-225. Thaler, R. (1980) 'Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1,39-60. Thaler, R. (1987) 'The Psychology of Choice and the Assumptions of Economics', Laboratory experimentation in economics: six points of view. Roth, A.E. (eds.) Cambridge University Press, 99-130. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/101943 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Proof of the invisible hand: the optimal consumer allocation of time under price dispersion. (deposited 22 Apr 2020 07:52)
-
Proof of the invisible hand: the optimal consumer allocation of time under price dispersion. (deposited 06 May 2020 14:21)
- Proof of the invisible hand: the optimal consumer allocation of time under price dispersion. (deposited 23 Jul 2020 02:19) [Currently Displayed]
-
Proof of the invisible hand: the optimal consumer allocation of time under price dispersion. (deposited 06 May 2020 14:21)