Correcting the Error in Gamma Discounting

Szekeres, Szabolcs (2020): Correcting the Error in Gamma Discounting.

Abstract

In “Gamma Discounting” Martin L. Weitzman (2001) concludes that certainty equivalent discount rates should decline significantly over time. He draws this conclusion from fitting a Gamma distribution to the responses of 2,160 economists asked to give a discount rate estimate and calculating effective discount rates from it. This paper shows that Weitzman’s model is based on an erroneous definition of expected present value. Correcting the definition changes Weitzman’s conclusions, explains the Pazner and Razin discrepancy and solves the Weitzman-Gollier puzzle under risk neutrality. The assertions of this paper are corroborated by calculations based on data found in Weitzman (2001).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Weitzman-Gollier puzzle; declining discount rates; discounting
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate

References

Groom, B., Hepburn, C., Koundouri, P. et al. (2005) Declining Discount Rates: The Long and the Short of it. Environmental Resource Economics 32, 445–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-4681-y

Groom, Ben and Hepburn, Cameron. (2017) Looking back at social discounting policy: The influence of papers, presentations, political preconditions, and personalities. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 11, (2) pp.336-356. ISSN 1750-6824.

Gollier, C. (2004) Maximizing the expected net future value as an alternative strategy to gamma discounting. Finance Research Letters Volume 1, Issue 2, June 2004, Pages 85-89. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612304000315

Gollier, C., Weitzman, M. L. (2010) How should distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain? Economics Letters 107:350–353

Gollier, C. (2016) Gamma discounters are short-termist, Journal of Public Economics, Volume 142, Pages 83-90, ISSN 0047-2727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.006. HMT (2003). Guidelines on Cost Benefit Analysis. HM Treasury, UK.

OECD (2018), Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Further Developments and Policy Use, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264085169-en. Pazner, E.A., Razin, A. (1975) On expected value vs. expected future value. The Journal of Finance, 30(3): 875-878.

Szekeres, Sz. (2013). The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle" is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot. Open Science Repository Economics, Online (open-access), e23050448. http://www.open-science-repository.com/economics-23050448.html

Szekeres, Sz. (2017) Checking Gollier and Weitzman’s solution of the “Weitzman–Gollier puzzle”. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2017-11, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2017-11

Szekeres, Sz. (2019) Why expected discount factors yield incorrect expected present values. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XIV, Spring, 1(63): 282-292. http://cesmaa.org/Docs/JAES-Volume-XIV-1-63-Spring-2019.pdf

Weitzman, M. L. (1998) Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36:201–208

Weitzman, M. L. (2001) Gamma discounting. American Economic Review 91:260–271