Quinonez, Pablo and Maldonado-Erazo, Claudia (2020): An overview of gender inequality in Latin America from a political economy perspective. Forthcoming in: Gender Inequality in Latin America. The Case of Ecuador (2021): pp. 11-31.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_102892.pdf Download (444kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article explains what shapes the gender dimension of economic inequalities in Latin America from the perspective of political economy. In order to do so, we follow Frank Stilwell's (2012) framework and use the model of the circuit of capital proposed by Marx and situate gender in the sequential conditions for capital accumulation. In this context, gender inequalities are seen as functional to the accumulation of capital since they help meeting three of the requirements for its expansion, namely the reproduction of labor power, the production of surplus value, and the realization of surplus value. Therefore, we conclude that non-coordinated efforts, claims for inclusion, and the invocation of specific differences are far from solving the problem of gender inequality if they are not part of a broader effort that understands the structural nature of the issue. Additionally, we emphasize the specific conditions that differentiate the situation of women in this region from elsewhere, as well as the cultural and institutional characteristics that have contributed to the relegation of women in Latin America over time.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | An overview of gender inequality in Latin America from a political economy perspective |
English Title: | An overview of gender inequality in Latin America from a political economy perspective |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | capital; gender; inequality; Latin America; Stilwell |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B51 - Socialist ; Marxian ; Sraffian B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B54 - Feminist Economics J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination |
Item ID: | 102892 |
Depositing User: | Mr Pablo Quiñonez |
Date Deposited: | 14 Sep 2020 06:11 |
Last Modified: | 14 Sep 2020 06:11 |
References: | Acevedo, L. (1995). Feminist inroads in the study of women’s work and development. En C. Bose y E. Acosta-Belén (Eds.), Women in the Latin American Development Process. Temple University Press. Acosta-Belén, E., y Bose, C. (1995). Colonialism, structural subordination, and empowerment: Women in the development process in Latin America and the Caribbean. En C. Bose y E. Acosta-Belén (Eds.), Women in the Latin American Development Process (pp. 15–37). Temple University Press. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., y Zucman, G. (2018). World Inequality Report 2018. Belknap Press. Anthias, F. (1980). Women and the Reserve Army of Labour: A Critique of Veronica Beechey. Capital & Class, 4(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981688001000105 Ardanche, M., y Celiberti, L. (2011). Entre el techo de cristal y el piso pegajoso. El trabajo como herramienta de inclusión en el Uruguay de 2011. Cotidiano Mujer. www.cotidianomujer.org.uy/sitio/pdf/pub_trabajo11baja.pdf Arruzza, C. (2014, Septiembre). Remarks on gender. Viewpoint Magazine. https://www.viewpointmag.com/2014/09/02/remarks-on-gender/ Bakker, I. (2007). Social reproduction and the constitution of a gendered political economy. New Political Economy, 12(4), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460701661561 Banco Mundial. (2018). Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2018. Piecing Together the Poverty Puzzle. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity Barrett, M. (1992). Words and things: Materialism and method in contemporary feminist analysis. En M. Barrett y A. Phillips (Eds.), Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates (pp. 201–219). Stanford University Press. Beechey, V. (1977). Some Notes on Female Wage Labour in Capitalist Production. Capital & Class, 1(3), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981687700300103 Benston, M. (1969). The Political Economy of Women’s Liberation. Monthly Review, 21(4), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-021-04-1969-08_2 Bessendorf, A. (2015). From Cradle to Cane: The Cost of Being a Female Consumer: A Study of Gender Pricing in New York City. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/dca/partners/gender-pricing-study.page Bhattacharya, T. (2020). Liberating Women from “Political Economy”. Margaret Benston’s Marxism and a Social-Reproduction Approach to Gender Oppression. Monthly Review, 71(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-071-08-2020-01_1 Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., y Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524 Blau, F. D., y Kahn, L. M. (2000). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.4.75 Blau, F. D., y Kahn, L. M. (2008). Women’s Work and Wages. En S. Durlauf y L. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (pp. 762–772). Palgrave Macmillan. Blau, F. D., y Kahn, L. M. (2017). The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160995 Brenner, J., y Laslett, B. (1986). Social reproduction and the family. En U. Himmelstrand (Ed.), Sociology Crisis to Science: Volume 2. The Social Reproduction of Organization and Culture (pp. 116–131). SAGE Publications Ltd. Carli, L. L., Alawa, L., Lee, Y., Zhao, B., y Kim, E. (2016). Stereotypes About Gender and Science: Women ≠ Scientists. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315622645 Coffey, C., Espinoza Revollo, P., Harvey, R., Lawson, M., Parvez Butt, A., Sarosi, D., y Thekkudan, J. (2020). Time to care. Unpaid and underpaid care work and the global inequality crisis. OXFAM. Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2016a). Autonomía de las mujeres e igualdad en la agenda de desarrollo sostenible. Naciones Unidas. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/40633/4/S1601248_es.pdf Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2016b). Notes for Equality N°18 (Issue March). https://oig.cepal.org/sites/default/files/note_18_wage_gap_.pdf Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2019). Women’s autonomy in changing economic scenarios. United Nations. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/45037 Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). (2020). CEPALSTAT. Databases and Statistical Publications [base de datos]. https://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/ Confederación Argentina de Mediana Empresa. (2019). Impuesto Rosa 2019. Dalla Costa, M., y James, S. (1975). The Power of women and the subversion of the community. Falling Wall Press Ltd. Dalla Costa, M., y James, S. (1997). Women and the Subversion of the Community. En R. Hennessy y C. Ingraham (Eds.), Materialist Feminism: A Reader in Class, Difference, and Women’s Lives (pp. 40–53). Psychology Press. Duesterhaus, M., Grauerholz, L., Weichsel, R., y Guittar, N. A. (2011). The Cost of Doing Femininity: Gendered Disparities in Pricing of Personal Care Products and Services. Gender Issues, 28(4), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-011-9106-3 Elson, D. (1991). Male Bias in Macro-economics: The Case of Structural Adjustment. En D. Elson (Ed.), Male Bias in the Development Process (pp. 164–190). Manchester University Press. Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia. Federici, S. (2018). El patriarcado del salario. Críticas feministas al marxismo. Traficantes de Sueños. Fogarty, M., Allen, I., y Walters, P. (1981). Women in top jobs, 1968-1979. Heinemann Educational. Folbre, N. (1994). Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. Routledge. Folbre, N. (2012). Should Women Care Less? Intrinsic Motivation and Gender Inequality. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(4), 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12000 Foro Económico Mundial. (2018). The Global Gender Gap Report 2018. Galbraith, J. K. (1975). Economics and the Public Purpose. The New American Library. Giles, D. (2003). Media Psychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Giménez, M. E. (2005). Capitalism and the oppression of women: Marx revisited. Science and Society, 69(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.69.1.11.56797 González de la Rocha, M. (2002). The Urban Family and Poverty in Latin America. En J. Abbassi y S. Lutjens (Eds.), Rereading Women in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Political Economy of Gender. Rowman & Littlefield. Grau, S. L., y Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research Gender stereotypes in advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1203556 Herdoíza, M. (2015). Construyendo Igualdad en la Educación Superior. Fundamentación y lineamientos para transversalizar los ejes de igualdad y ambiente. SENESCYT/UNESCO. Kunze, A. (2005). The evolution of the gender wage gap. Labour Economics, 12(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2004.02.012 Laslett, B., y Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.15.1.381 Lexartza Artza, L., Chaves Groh, M. J., Carcedo Cabañas, A., y Sánchez, A. (2019). La brecha salarial entre hombres y mujeres en América Latina. En el camino hacia la igualdad salarial. Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Marx, K. (2001). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I. The Electric Book Company. Morán Chiquito, D., Cabrera Montecé, D., y Moreno Zea, M. (2021). The Cost of Femininity: evidence for the City of Guayaquil. En P. Quiñonez y C. Maldonado-Erazo (Eds.), Gender Inequality in Latin America. The Case of Ecuador (pp. 158–179). Brill. [Forthcoming] Muñoz Boudet, A. M. (2011, Noviembre). América Latina: mujeres aún luchan por igualdad en trabajo y el hogar. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/es/latinamerica/am-rica-latina-mujeres-a-n-luchan-por-igualdad-en-trabajo-y-el-hogar Murillo, C., y D’Atri, A. (2018, Septiembre). Producing and Reproducing: Capitalism’s Dual Oppression of Women. Left Voice Magazine. https://www.leftvoice.org/on-reproductive-labor-wage-slavery-and-the-new-working-class ONU Mujeres. (2015). Progress of the World’s Women 2015-2016. Transforming Economies, Realizing Rights. ONU Mujeres. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2015/4/progress-of-the-worlds-women-2015 Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). (2018). Global Wage Report 2018/19. What lies behind gender pay gaps. ILO / International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/global-wage-report/WCMS_650568 Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). (2019). Women in the World of Work. Pending Challenges for Achieving Effective Equality in Latin America and the Caribbean. ILO / Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.ilo.org/americas/publicaciones/WCMS_736930 Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). (2020). ILOSTAT database [base de datos]. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/ Ortiz-Ospina, E., y Roser, M. (2020). Economic inequality by gender. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/economic-inequality-by-gender Picchio, M., y Mussida, C. (2011). Gender wage gap: A semi-parametric approach with sample selection correction. Labour Economics, 18(5), 564–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2011.05.003 Ricardo, D. (2001). Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. The Electric Book Company. Safa, H. (2002). Economic Restructuring and Gender Subordination. En J. Abbassi y S. Lutjens (Eds.), Rereading Women in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Political Economy of Gender. Rowman & Littlefield. Sandmo, A. (2015). The Principal Problem in Political Economy: Income Distribution in the History of Economic Thought. En A. Atkinson y F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution (1st ed., Vol. 2, pp. 3–65). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00002-3 Segal, L. (1999). Why Feminism?: Gender, Psychology, Politics. Columbia University Press. Stevens, J. L., y Shanahan, K. J. (2012). Anger, Willingness, or Clueless? Understanding Why Women Pay a Pink Tax on the Products They Consume. En E. Stieler (Ed.), Creating Marketing Magic and Innovative Future Marketing Trends (pp. 571–575). Academy of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45596-9_108 Stilwell, F. (2012). Political Economy. The Contest of Economic Ideas (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. Stilwell, F. (2019). The Political Economy of Inequality. Polity Press. Stilwell, F., y Jordan, K. (2007). Who Gets What? Analysing Economic Inequality in Australia. Cambridge University Press. Uribe, R., Manzur, E., Hidalgo, P., y Fernández, R. (2008). Estereotipos de género en la publicidad: un análisis de contenido de las revistas chilenas. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 41, 1–18. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=71611842003 Villar García, M. G., Mora Cantellano, M. del P., y Maldonado Reyes, A. A. (2016). La construcción identitaria de género en las representaciones sociales de la publicidad de época en México. Una reflexión hacía la sustentabilidad cultural. 21° Encuentro Nacional Sobre Desarrollo Regional En México. http://ru.iiec.unam.mx/3398/ Walby, S. (1986). Patriarchy at work: patriarchal and capitalist relations in employment. Polity Press. Whittelsey, F., y Carroll, M. (1995). Women Pay More: And How to Put a Stop to It. New Press. Wilson, T. D. (2003). Forms of Male Domination and Female Subordination: Homeworkers versus Maquiladora Workers in Mexico. Review of Radical Political Economics, 35(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613402250194 Witz, A. (1992). Professions and Patriarchy. Routledge. Woetzel, J., Madgavkar, A., Ellingrud, K., Labaye, E., Devillard, S., Kutcher, E., Manyika, J., Dobbs, R., y Krishnan, M. (2015). The power of parity: How advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth. McKinsey Global Institute. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102892 |