Eliasson, Jonas and Savemark, Christian and Franklin, Joel (2020): The impact of land use effects in infrastructure appraisal. Forthcoming in: Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice (2020)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_103085.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
When benefits of proposed infrastructure investments are forecasted, residential location is usually treated as fixed, since very few operational transport models are able to forecast residential relocation. It has been argued that this may constitute a source of serious error or bias when evaluating and comparing the benefits of proposed infrastructure investments. We use a stylized simulation model of a metropolitan region to compare calculated benefits for a large number of infrastructure investments with and without taking changes in residential location into account. In particular, we explore the changes in project selection when assembling an optimal project portfolio under a budget constraint. The simulation model includes endogenous land prices and demand for residential land, heterogeneous preferences and wage offers across residents, and spillover mechanisms which affect wage rates in zones. The model is calibrated to generate realistic travel patterns and demand elasticities. Our results indicate that ignoring residential relocation has a small but appreciable effect on the selected project portfolio, but only a very small effect on achieved total benefits.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The impact of land use effects in infrastructure appraisal |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cost-benefit analysis, land use, wider impacts, land use/transport interaction models. |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R14 - Land Use Patterns R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R40 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning |
Item ID: | 103085 |
Depositing User: | Professor Jonas Eliasson |
Date Deposited: | 30 Sep 2020 13:20 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2020 13:20 |
References: | Acheampong, R. A., & Silva, E. A. (2015). Land use–transport interaction modeling: A review of the literature and future research directions. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(3), 11–38. Asplund, D., & Eliasson, J. (2016). Does uncertainty make cost-benefit analyses pointless? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.002 Bondemark, A., Sundbergh, P., Tornberg, P., & Brundell-Freij, K. (2020). Do impact assessments influence transport plans? The case of Sweden. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 134, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.002 Börjesson, M., & Eliasson, J. (2019). Should values of time be differentiated? Transport Reviews, 39(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1480543 Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., & Lundberg, M. (2014). Is CBA ranking of transport investments robust? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 48(2), 189–204. Börjesson, M., Isacsson, G., Andersson, M., & Anderstig, C. (2019). Agglomeration, productivity and the role of transport system improvements. Economics of Transportation, 18, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2018.12.002 Börjesson, M., Jonsson, R. D., Berglund, S., & Almström, P. (2014). Land-use impacts in transport appraisal. Research in Transportation Economics, 47, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.021 Dagsvik, J. K., & Karlström, A. (2005). Compensating Variation and Hicksian Choice Probabilities in Random Utility Models that are Nonlinear in Income. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00324 Eliasson, J. (2010). The influence of accessibility on residential location. Theory and estimation of an integrated land use-transportation model. In J. Preston, F. Pagliara, & D. Simmonds (Eds.), Residential Location Choice – Models and Applications. Springer Verlag. Eliasson, J., Börjesson, M., Odeck, J., & Welde, M. (2015). Does Benefit–Cost Efficiency Influence Transport Investment Decisions? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 49(3), 377–396. Eliasson, J., & Fosgerau, M. (2013). Cost overruns and benefit shortfalls—Deception or selection? Transportation Research B, 57, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.09.005 Eliasson, J., & Fosgerau, M. (2019). Cost-benefit analysis of transport improvements in the presence of spillovers, matching and an income tax. Economics of Transportation, 18, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2019.02.001 Eliasson, J., & Lundberg, M. (2012). Do Cost–Benefit Analyses Influence Transport Investment Decisions? Experiences from the Swedish Transport Investment Plan 2010–21. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.582541 Eliasson, J., & Martìnez, F. (2001). Interfaces between location, land-use and travel decisions. In The leading edge in travel behaviour research. Elsevier. Eliasson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. (2000). A model for integrated analysis of household location and travel choices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 34(5), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00038-5 Eliasson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. (2001). Transport and Location Effects of Road Pricing: A Simulation Approach. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 35(3), 417–456. Fosgerau, M., McFadden, D., & Bierlaire, M. (2013). Choice probability generating functions. Journal of Choice Modelling, 8, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2013.05.002 Franklin, J., Waddell, P., & Britting, J. (2002). Sensitivity analysis approach for an integrated land development & travel demand modeling system. Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning 44th Annual Conference. Galvez, T. E., & Jara-Díaz, S. R. (1998). On the social valuation of travel time savings. International Journal of Transport Economics, 25(1), 205–219. Harberger, A. C. (1978). On the Use of Distributional Weights in Social Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 86(2), S87–S120. https://doi.org/10.2307/1829758 Iacono, M., Levinson, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2008). Models of Transportation and Land Use Change: A Guide to the Territory. Journal of Planning Literature, 22(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412207314010 Iniestra, J. G., & Gutiérrez, J. G. (2009). Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.07.006 Jara-Díaz, S. R., & Guevara, C. A. (2003). Behind the Subjective Value of Travel Time Savings. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 37, 29–46. Melo, P. C., & Graham, D. J. (2014). Testing for labour pooling as a source of agglomeration economies: Evidence for labour markets in England and Wales. Papers in Regional Science, 93(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00462.x Moeckel, R., Garcia, C. L., Chou, A. T. M., & Okrah, M. B. (2018). Trends in integrated land use/transport modeling: An evaluation of the state of the art. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1205 Nellthorp, J., & Mackie, P. (2000). The UK Roads Review—A hedonic model of decision making. Transport Policy, 7(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00002-0 Pearce, D. W., & Nash, C. A. (1981). The Social Appraisal of Projects – A Text in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Macmillan. Sugden, R. (1999). Developing a consistent cost-benefit framework for multi-modal transport appraisal [Report to the Department for Transport]. University of East Anglia. Szimba, E., & Rothengatter, W. (2012). Spending Scarce Funds More Efficiently—Including the Pattern of Interdependence in Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 18(4), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000102 Venables, A. J. (2007). Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 41(2), 173–188. Waddell, P. (2011). Integrated Land Use and Transportation Planning and Modelling: Addressing Challenges in Research and Practice. Transport Reviews, 31(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.525671 Waddell, P., Ulfarsson, G. F., Franklin, J. P., & Lobb, J. (2007). Incorporating land use in metropolitan transportation planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(5), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.008 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/103085 |