Debt and demand regimes in canonical growth models: a comparison of neo-Kaleckian and Supermultiplier models

Brochier, Lidia and Freitas, Fábio (2019): Debt and demand regimes in canonical growth models: a comparison of neo-Kaleckian and Supermultiplier models.

Abstract

The paper addresses the features of stock-flow consistent (SFC) canonical versions of neo-Kaleckian (NK) and Supermultiplier (SM) models that introduce either the accumulation of debt of households or firms. The aim of this comparison is twofold: (i) to analyze the implications of a debt accumulation process in each of these models; (ii) to evaluate the extent to which these debt accumulation processes differ due to each model's specific closure. For that purpose, we investigate the relation of debt ratios, demand, and growth, focusing on the conditions for the paradox of debt to arise in each model; and the stability conditions of firms' and household debt ratios. Results suggest that not only the paradox of debt in the firms' sector is not a necessary result of SM models, but the Minskyan debt regime is the sole economically viable one in the long-run. For the NK model, as extensively explored in the literature, firms' leverage ratio can be either pro-cyclical or anti-cyclical. About the demand regimes, in this canonical version of the SM model, firms' debt has no direct effect on demand; as for the NK model, demand can be either debt-led or debt-burdened. As for the household sector, the paradox of debt is a feature of the canonical Supermultiplier model in the long run, yet there may be episodes of rising debt-to-income ratios and financial crises as precipitated by policy decisions. Besides, only the debt-led demand regime is compatible with a stable household debt ratio. In turn, in the neo-Kaleckian model, results are ambiguous in what concerns the two-way relation between demand and household debt.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Paradox of debt, neo-Kaleckian model, Supermultiplier model, autonomous expenditures, SFC
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

References

Allain, O. (2015). Tackling the instability of growth: a Kaleckian-Harrodian model with an autonomous expenditure component. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5):1351–1371.

Brochier, L. and Macedo e Silva, A. C. (2018). A supermultiplier Stock-Flow Consistent model: the return of the paradoxes of thrift and costs in the long run ? Cambridge Journal of Economics, (Advanced access):1–30.

Cardaci, A. (2018). Inequality, household debt and financial instability: An agent-based perspective. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 149:434–458.

Dutt, A. K. (1995). Internal Finance and Monopoly Power in Capitalist Economies: a Reformulation of Steindl’S Growth Model. Metroeconomica, 46(1):16–34.

Dutt, A. K. (2006). Maturity, Stagnation and Consumer Debt: a Steindlian Approach. Metroeconomica, 57(3):339–364.

Dutt, A. K. (2019). Some observations on models of growth and distribution with autonomous demand growth. Metroeconomica, 70(2):288–301.

Fagundes, L. (2017). Dinamica do consumo, do investimento e o supermultiplicador: uma contribuicao a teoria do crescimento liderada pela demanda. PhD thesis, UFRJ.

Freitas, F. and Serrano, F. (2015). Growth Rate and Level Effects, the Stability of the Adjustment of Capacity to Demand and the Sraffian Supermultiplier. Review of Political Economy, 27(3):258–281.

Hein, E. (2006). Interest, debt and capital accumulation - A Kaleckian approach. International Review of Applied Economics, 20(3):337–352.

Hein, E. (2012). The Macroeconomics of Finance-dominated Capitalism - and its Crisis. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.

Isaac, A. G. and Kim, Y. K. (2013). Consumer and Corporate Debt: A Neo-Kaleckian Synthesis. Metroeconomica, 64(2):244–271.

Kim, Y. K. (2012). Emulation and Consumer Debt : Implications of Keeping Up with the Joneses. pages 1–30.

Lavoie, M. (1995). Interest rates in post-Keynesian models of growth and distribution. Metroeconomica, 46(2):146–177.

Lavoie, M. (2014). Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Lavoie, M. (2016). Convergence towards the normal rate of capacity utilization in neo-kaleckian models: The role of non-capacity creating autonomous expenditures. Metroeconomica, 67(1):172–201.

Lavoie, M. and Seccareccia, M. (2001). Minsky’s financial fragility hypothesis: a missing macroeconomic link? In Bellofiore, R. and Ferri, P. E., editors, Financial Fragility and Investment in the Capitalist Economy: The Economic Legacy of Hyman Minsky, chapter Chapter 4, pages 76–96. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.

Mandarino, G. (2018). Gabriel Vieira Mandarino Households Debt-financed Consumption A Supermultiplier SFC model.

Minsky, H. P. (1982). The financial-instability hypothesis: capitalist processes and the behavior of the economy. In Kindleberger, C. and Laffargue, J., editors, Financial Crises: Theory, History and Policy, pages 13–38. Cambridge Univeristy Press, Cambridge, UK. Minsky, H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. Yale University Press, New Haven.

Nikiforos, M. (2018). Some comments on the Sraffian Supermultiplier approach to growth and distribution. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 41(4):659–675.

Pariboni, R. (2016). Household consumer debt , endogenous money and growth : A supermultiplier-based analysis. 69(September):211–233.

Pedrosa, I. (2019). Firms’ leverage ratio and the Financial Instability Hypothesis: an empirical investigation for the US economy (1970–2014). Cambridge Journal of Economics, pages 1–25.

Ryoo, S. (2013). The paradox of debt and minsky’s financial instability hypothesis. Metroeconomica, 64(1):1–24.

Ryoo, S. and Kim, Y. K. (2014). Income Distribution, Consumer Debt and Keeping up with the Joneses. Metroeconomica.

Serrano, F. (1995). Long Period Effective Demand and the Sraffian Supermultiplier. Contributions to Political Economy, 14:67–90.

Setterfield, M., Kim, Y. K., and Rees, J. (2016). Inequality, Debt Servicing and the Sustainability of Steady State Growth. Review of Political Economy, 28(1):45–63.

Steindl, J. (1952). Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism. Monthly Review Press, New York.

Taylor, L. (2004). Reconstructing Macroeconomics: Structuralist Proposals and Critiques of the Mainstream. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Taylor, L. and O Connell, A. (1985). A Minsky crisis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100:871–85.

Toporowski, J. (2005). Theories of Financial Disturbance. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.

van Treeck, T. (2009). A synthetic, stock-flow consistent macroeconomic model of financialisation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(3):467–493.