Chowdhury, Subhasish and Mukherjee, Anwesha and Sheremeta, Roman (2021): In-group versus Out-group Preferences in Intergroup Conflict: An Experiment.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105690.pdf Download (943kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Individuals participating in a group conflict have different preferences, e.g., maximizing their own payoff, maximizing the group’s payoff, or defeating the rivals. When such preferences are present simultaneously, it is difficult to distinctly identify the impact of those preferences on conflict. In order to separate in-group and out-group preferences, we conduct an experiment in which human in-group or out-group players are removed while keeping the game strategically similar. Our design allows us to study (i) how effort in a group conflict vary due to in-group and out-group preferences, and (ii) how the impact of these preferences vary when the two groups have explicitly different social identities. The results of our experiment show that the presence of in-groups enhances concern about individual payoffs. A further presence of out-groups moderates the concern for individual payoffs through an additional concern for own group payoffs. The negative effect of the in-group preferences and the positive effect of the out-group preferences are weaker when group members have a common social identity.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | In-group versus Out-group Preferences in Intergroup Conflict: An Experiment |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Group conflict; Contest; Identity; Social preferences. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions |
Item ID: | 105690 |
Depositing User: | Dr Subhasish Chowdhury |
Date Deposited: | 03 Feb 2021 14:28 |
Last Modified: | 03 Feb 2021 14:28 |
References: | Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2010). Intergroup conflict and intra-group punishment in an experimental contest game. American Economic Review, 100(1), 420-47. Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2012). Parochial altruism in inter-group conflicts. Economics Letters, 117(1), 45-48. Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(3), 324-337. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Ahn, T. K., Isaac, R. M., & Salmon, T. C. (2011). Rent seeking in groups. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(1), 116-125. Baik, K. H. (1993). Effort levels in contests: The public-good prize case. Economics Letters, 41(4), 363-367. Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American economic review, 90(1), 166-193. Bornstein, G., & Ben-Yossef, M. (1994). Cooperation in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(1), 52-67. Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of social issues, 55(3), 429-444. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral science, 3(1), 14. Charness, G., & Chen, Y. (2020). Social identity, group behavior, and teams. Annual Review of Economics, 12. Charng, H. W., Piliavin, J. A., & Callero, P. L. (1988). Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social psychology quarterly, 303-317. Choi, J. P., Chowdhury, S. M., & Kim, J. (2016). Group contests with internal conflict and power asymmetry. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 118(4), 816-840. Chowdhury, S. M. (2021). The Economics of Identity and Conflict. In the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. Oxford University Press. Chowdhury, S. M., & Topolyan, I. (2016). The Attack‐And‐Defense Group Contests: Best Shot Versus Weakest Link. Economic Inquiry, 54(1), 548-557. Chowdhury, S. M., Jeon, J. Y., & Ramalingam, A. (2016). Identity and group conflict. European Economic Review, 90, 107-121. Chowdhury, S. M., Jeon, J. Y., & Ramalingam, A. (2018). Property rights and loss aversion in contests. Economic Inquiry, 56(3), 1492-1511. Chowdhury, S. M., Lee, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2013). Top guns may not fire: Best-shot group contests with group-specific public good prizes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 92, 94-103. Cooper, D. J., & Kagel, J. H. (2016). Other-regarding preferences. The handbook of experimental economics, 2, 217. Cox, C. A. (2017). Rent-seeking and competitive preferences. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 102-116. Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R. M. (2015). A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experimental Economics, 18(4), 609-669. Eisenkopf, G. (2014). The impact of management incentives in intergroup contests. European Economic Review, 67, 42-61. Esteban, J., Mayoral, L., & Ray, D. (2012a). Ethnicity and conflict: An empirical study. The American Economic Review, 102(4), 1310-1342. Esteban, J., Mayoral, L., & Ray, D. (2012b). Ethnicity and Conflict: Theory and Facts, Science, 336, 858-865. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The quarterly journal of economics, 114(3), 817-868. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2011). Common ingroup identity model. In The encyclopedia of peace psychology. D. J. Christie (Ed.). Garfinkel, M. R., & Skaperdas, S. (2007). Economics of conflict: An overview. Handbook of defense economics, 2, 649-709. Halevy, N., Bornstein, G., & Sagiv, L. (2008). “In-group love” and “out-group hate” as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychological science, 19(4), 405-411. Herrmann, B., & Orzen, H. (2008). The appearance of homo rivalis: Social preferences and the nature of rent seeking (No. 2008-10). CeDEx discussion paper series. Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox‐Cardamone, D. L., & Crook, K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 305-317. Huettel, S. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2012). Identity economics and the brain: uncovering the mechanisms of social conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 680-691. Insko, C. A., Wildschut, T., & Cohen, T. R. (2013). Interindividual–intergroup discontinuity in the prisoner’s dilemma game: How common fate, proximity, and similarity affect intergroup competition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 168-180. Katz, E., Nitzan, S., & Rosenberg, J. (1990). Rent-seeking for pure public goods. Public Choice, 65(1), 49-60. Kolmar, M., & Rommeswinkel, H. (2013). Contests with group-specific public goods and complementarities in efforts. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 9-22. Lee, D. (2012). Weakest-link contests with group-specific public good prizes. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(2), 238-248. Münster, J. (2007). Simultaneous inter-and intra-group conflicts. Economic Theory, 32(2), 333-352. Riechmann, T. (2007). An analysis of rent-seeking games with relative-payoff maximizers. Public Choice, 133(1-2), 147-155. Sen, A. (1985). Goals, commitment, and identity. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 1, 341. Sen, A. (2007). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. Penguin Books India. Sheremeta, R. M. (2011). Perfect-substitutes, best-shot, and weakest-link contests between groups. Korean Economic Review, 27, 5-32. Sheremeta, R. M. (2015). Behavioral dimensions of contests. In Companion to the political economy of rent seeking. Edward Elgar Publishing. Sheremeta, R. M. (2020). Impulsive behavior in competition: Testing theories of overbidding in rent-seeking contests. Available at SSRN 2676419. Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Houghton Mifflin. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Vol. 10). Norman, OK: University Book Exchange. Shupp, R., Sheremeta, R. M., Schmidt, D., & Walker, J. (2013). Resource allocation contests: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 257-267. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-103. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In Toward a Theory of Rent-seeking Society, G. T. James, M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison (Ed.), College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univrsity Press, 97-112. Weisel, O. & Zultan, R. (2016). Social motives in intergroup conflict: Group identity and perceived target of threat. European Economic Review, 90, 122-133. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105690 |