Zheng, Zhijie and Hu, Ruiyang and Yang, Yibai (2021): Inflation, endogenous quality increment, and economic growth.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106989.pdf Download (391kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study explores the effects of monetary policy in a Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous quality increment and distinct cash-in-advance (CIA) constraints on consumption, manufacturing and R&D investment. Our results are summarized as follows. When the CIA constraint is solely on consumption expenditure, an increase in the nominal interest rate may stifle economic growth by lowering the arrival rate of innovation and stimulate it at the same time by raising the size of quality increment. An additional CIA constraint on manufacturing weakens the growth-retarding effect and enhances the growth-promoting effect, whereas an additional CIA constraint on R&D investment strengthens only the negative growth effect. The quantitative analysis finds that the relationship between inflation and growth can be either monotonically decreasing or hump-shaped, but the welfare effect of inflation is always negative.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Inflation, endogenous quality increment, and economic growth |
English Title: | Inflation, endogenous quality increment, and economic growth |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Monetary Policy, Economic Growth, R&D, Endogenous Quality Increment |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General |
Item ID: | 106989 |
Depositing User: | PhD Zhijie Zheng |
Date Deposited: | 06 Apr 2021 01:45 |
Last Modified: | 06 Apr 2021 01:45 |
References: | Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60 (2), 323–51. Arawatari, R., Hori, T. and Mino, K. (2018). On the nonlinear relationship between inflation and growth: A theoretical exposition. Journal of Monetary Economics. Banerjee, A., Cockerell, L. and Russell, B. (2001). An i (2) analysis of inflation and the markup. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 221–240. — and Russell, B. (2001). The relationship between the markup and inflation in the g7 economies and australia. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (2), 377–384. Barro, R. J. (2013). Inflation and economic growth. Annals of Economics & Finance, 14 (1). Bils, M. (1987). The cyclical behavior of marginal cost and price. American Economic Review, pp. 838–855. Bond, E. W., Wang, P. and Yip, C. K. (1996). A general two-sector model of endogenous growth with human and physical capital: balanced growth and transitional dynamics. Journal of Economic Theory, 68 (1), 149–173. Booth, G. G. and Ciner, C. (2001). The relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation: international evidence. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 11 (3), 269–280. Burdekin, R. C., Denzau, A. T., Keil, M. W., Sitthiyot, T. and Willett, T. D. (2004). When does inflation hurt economic growth? different nonlinearities for different economies. Journal of Macroeconomics, 26 (3), 519–532. Caballero, R. J. and Jaffe, A. B. (2002). How High Are the Giants’ Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth, In: A. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg (Eds.), Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Chang, J.-j., Chang, W.-y., Tsai, H.-f. and Wang, P. (2019). Inflation targeting, pattern of trade, and economic dynamics. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 23 (7), 2748–2786. Chu, A. C. and Cozzi, G. (2014). R&d and economic growth in a cash-in-advance economy. International Economic Review, 55 (2), 507–524. —, —, Furukawa, Y. and Liao, C.-H. (2017). Inflation and economic growth in a Schumpeterian model with endogenous entry of heterogeneous firms. European Economic Review, 98, 392–409. —, —, Lai, C.-C. and Liao, C.-H. (2015). Inflation, r&d and growth in an open economy. Journal of International Economics, 96 (2), 360–374. — and Ji, L. (2016). Monetary policy and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20 (5), 1127–1145. — and Lai, C.-C. (2013). Money and the welfare cost of inflation in an r&d growth model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 45 (1), 233–249. Cozzi, G., Giordani, P. E. and Zamparelli, L. (2007). The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory, 136 (1), 788–797. Dotsey, M. and Sarte, P. D. (2000). Inflation uncertainty and growth in a cash-in-advance economy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 45 (3), 631–655. Gali, J., Gertler, M. and Lopez-Salido, J. D. (2007). Markups, gaps, and the welfare costs of business fluctuations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (1), 44–59. Gil, P. M. and Iglésias, G. (2020). Endogenous growth and real effects of monetary policy: R&d and physical capital complementarities. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52 (5), 1147–1197. Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991). Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (1), 43–61. Haskel, J., Martin, C., Small, I. et al. (1995). Price, marginal cost and the business cycle. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57 (1), 25–41. Hori, T. (2017). Monetary policy, financial frictions, and heterogeneous r&d firms in an endogenous growth model. Scandinavian Journal of Economics. Howitt, P. (1999a). Steady endogenous growth with population and r&d inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107 (4), 715–730. — (1999b). Steady endogenous growth with population and r&d inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107 (4), 715–730. Huang, C.-Y., Yang, Y. and Cheng, C.-C. (2017). The growth and welfare analysis of patent and monetary policies in a Schumpeterian economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 52, 409–426. —, — and Zheng, Z. (2019). Monetary policy in a Schumpeterian growth model with Two R&D sectors. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Macau. Jones, C. I. and Williams, J. C. (2000). Too much of a good thing? the economics of investment in r&d. Journal of Economic Growth, 5 (1), 65–85. Khan, M. S. and Senhadji, A. S. (2001). Threshold effects in the relationship between inflation and growth. IMF Staff papers, 48 (1), 1–21. Kortum, S. S. (1997). Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica, 65 (6), 1389–1420. Kremer, S., Bick, A. and Nautz, D. (2013). Inflation and growth: new evidence from a dynamic panel threshold analysis. Empirical Economics, pp. 1–18. Laitner, J. and Stolyarov, D. (2013). Derivative ideas and the value of intangible assets. International Economic Review, 54 (1), 59–95. Lanjouw, J. O. (1998). Patent protection in the shadow of infringement: Simulation estimations of patent value. Review of Economic Studies, 65 (4), 671–710. López-Villavicencio, A. and Mignon, V. (2011). On the impact of inflation on output growth: Does the level of inflation matter? Journal of Macroeconomics, 33 (3), 455–464. Lucas, R. E. (1980). Equilibrium in a pure currency economy. Economic Inquiry, 18 (2), 203. Marquis, M. H. and Reffett, K. L. (1994). New technology spillovers into the payment system. Economic Journal, pp. 1123–1138. Martins, J. O. and Scarpetta, S. (2002). Estimation of the cyclical behaviou of mark-ups: a technical note. OECD Economic studies, 2002 (1), 173–188. Mishkin, F. S. (1992). Is the Fisher effect for real? : A reexamination of the relationship between inflation and interest rates. Journal of Monetary Economics, 30 (2), 195–215. Nekarda, C. J. and Ramey, V. A. (2013). The cyclical behavior of the price-cost markup. Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research. Oikawa, K. and Ueda, K. (2018). The optimal inflation rate under schumpeterian growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 100, 114–125. Peretto, P. F. (1998). Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3 (4), 283–311. — and Connolly, M. (2007). The manhattan metaphor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12 (4), 329–350. Phaneuf, L., Sims, E. and Victor, J. G. (2018). Inflation, output and markup dynamics with purely forward-looking wage and price setters. European Economic Review, 105, 115–134. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5, Part 2), S71–S102. Rotemberg, J. J. and Woodford, M. (1991). Markups and the business cycle. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 6, 63–129. — and — (1999). The cyclical behavior of prices and costs. Handbook of Macroeconomics, 1, 1051–1135. Segerstrom, P. S. (1998). Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review, 88 (5), 1290–1310. Stroebel, J. and Vavra, J. (2019). House prices, local demand, and retail prices. Journal of Political Economy,127 (3), 1391–1436. Vaona, A. (2012). Inflation and growth in the long run: A new Keynesian theory and further semi-parametric evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 16 (1), 94–132. Wu, Y. and Zhang, J. (2001). The effects of inflation on the number of firms and firm size. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, pp. 251–271. Zheng, Z., Huang, C.-Y. and Yang, Y. (2019). Inflation and growth: A non-monotonic relationship in an innovation-driven economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics, pp. 1–28. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106989 |