Resurgence of transition economics: Brexit as an expected example, experience and lesson

Matoshi, Ruzhdi and Mulaj, Isa (2020): Resurgence of transition economics: Brexit as an expected example, experience and lesson. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

Transition economics was and still is a topic mostly associated with the post-communist countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The cause of its emergence as a theory was not purely economic – the spearhead was politics – leading to the collapse of the Eastern Block, to be followed by the disintegration of three federal states: Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia, with many civil wars and ethnic conflicts. The experience proved a relaxation to the Western liberal developed democracies as it strengthened the belief of their superior model which the transition economies want to embrace. First of all, the transition provided a new opportunity for interaction between European East and West. On the eve of its 30th anniversary, with more than half of these countries experiencing “the end of transition” and joining the European Union (EU) while the rest considered not yet meeting the “standards”, another transition is on the way, and this one not going into but coming out from the EU, Brexit respectively. Just like in former communist countries, it too, originated from politics, namely the results of 23.06.2016 referendum results that decided for the withdrawal of the United Kingdom (UK) from the EU, a move that is about to force considerable changes in the economy, already labelled as “transition.” Although an intensive phase of research and debate is underway, the aim of this paper is to explore the implications of Brexit in terms of its international economics and contribute to a more general theory of transition economics which so far has been reserved for, and as a reference to, post-communist countries in CEE.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: CEE, transformation, transition economics, Brexit, EU, general theory
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; N - Economic History > N4 - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation > N44 - Europe: 1913-; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy; P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P27 - Performance and Prospects; P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P33 - International Trade, Finance, Investment, Relations, and Aid

References

Ahrens, Joachim and Jünemann, Patrick (2010). Transitional institutions, institutional complementarities and economic performance in China: A ‘varieties of capitalism’ approach. Ordnungspolitische Discurse No. 2010-11.

Alabrese, Eleonora., Becker, Sascha O., Fetzer, Thiemo and Novy, Dennis (2019). Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined. European Journal of Political Economy 56, 132-150.

Bachman, Veit and Sidaway, James D. (2016). Brexit geopolitics. Geoforum 77, 47-50.

Blanchard, Olivier (1997). The Economics of Post-Communist Transition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Breinlich, Holger., Leromain Elsa., Novy, Dennis., and Sampson, Thomas (2020). Voting with their money: Brexit and outward investment by UK firms. European Economic Review 124, 1-20.

Csaba, Laszlo (2004). Transition in and towards Europe: Economic Development and EU accession of the Post-Communist States. Zeitschrift für stats und Europawissenschaften 3, 330-350.

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development – EBRD (various issues). Transition Report. London: EBRD.

Glencross, Andrew and McCourt, David (2018). Living up to a New Role in the World: The Challenges of ‘Global Britain’. Orbis, published for the Foreign Policy Research Institute by Elsevier Ltd., 582-597.

International Monetary Fund (1997). World Economy in Transition: Experience under the IMF’s Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility. Washington D.C.:, IMF Policy Development and Department of Review.

Kornai, János (2006). The great transformation of Central Eastern Europe Success and disappointment. Economics of Transition 14 (2), 207–244.

Kornai, Janos (2012). Innovation and Dynamism: Interaction between Systems and Technical Progress. Working Paper No. 2010/33, Helsinki: United Nations University, World Institute for Development Research.

Lavinge, Marie (1999). The Economics of Transition: From Socialist Economy to Market Economy. 2nd ed., University of Michigan: MacMillan.

Matoshi, Ruzhdi and Mulaj, Isa (2019). Social Market Economy as an alternative to the Washington Consensus in the Western Balkans. Economic Vision 6 (11-12), 180-191.

Mold, Andrew (2018). The consequences of Brexit for Africa: The case of the East African Community. Journal of African Trade 5, 1-17.

Nolan, Peter (1995). China’s Rise, Russia’s Fall: Politics, Economics and Planning in the Transition from Stalinism, London: MacMillan.

Prescot, Craig., Pilato, Manuela., and Bellia, Claudio (2020). Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An uncertain future? Food Policy 90, in press.

Roland, Gérard (2001). The Political Economy of Transition. Working Paper No. 413, William Davidson Institute: University of Michigan.

Schiereck, Dirki., Kiesel, Florian., and Kolaric Sacha (2016). Brexit: (Not) another Lehman moment for banks?. Finance Research Letters 19, 291-297.

Seliger, Bernhard (2002). Toward a More General Theory of Transformation. Eastern European Economics 40 (1), 36-62.

Svejnar, Jan (2002). Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1), 3–28.

Tielmann, Artur and Schiereck, Dirk (2017). Arising borders and the value of logistic companies: Evidence from the Brexit referendum in Great Britain. Finance Research Letters 20, 22-28.