Environmental and Technical Efficiency in Large Gold Mines in Developing Countries

Magambo, Isaiah and Dikgang, Johane and Gelo, Dambala and Tregenna, Fiona (2021): Environmental and Technical Efficiency in Large Gold Mines in Developing Countries.

Abstract

Given the increasing importance of the mining sector in developing countries, an understanding of their level of environmental efficiency is useful, both to the industry itself and to policymakers. Environmental problems introduced by the sector are attracting extensive attention, so comprehensive analysis of their environmental performance has become increasingly important. This study evaluates the environmental performance of large gold-mining operations by applying a by-production model that specifies emission-generating technology, while incorporating a four-way error approach that captures mine-size heterogeneity, transient and persistent technical efficiency, and random errors. We applied a true random effects model (TREM), and a simulated maximum likelihood estimator (SMLE) based on the generalised true random effects model (GTREM). The former approach was estimated as a benchmark, while the latter was employed to estimate a four-component panel data stochastic frontier model. The four-components estimate separates firm heterogeneity from persistent and time-varying inefficiencies, thus providing more robust efficiency estimates and policy insights. Firm-level data from 2009 to 2018 were used; the results show the presence of environmental and technical inefficiencies. Moreover, each inefficiency was decomposed into transient and persistent inefficiencies. The GTREM predicts the average inefficiency to amount to 34% environmental (interaction between 19% transient and 18% persistent) and 30% technical (interaction between 4.4% transient and 27% persistent). The transient component of technical efficiency does not change over time, which may imply that the mines’ managerial approaches are static. The presence of technical inefficiency implies that more than the minimal amounts of inputs are used to produce a given level of desirable output, which could be due to moral hazards and asymmetric information such as principal-agent problems. The presence of (environmental) inefficiency in the by-production model means that more than a minimal amount of the undesirable output is produced. The overall environmental performance of the mines in developing countries is low (66%) compared to other sectors, which indicates that there could be structural rigidities, poor environmental policies and regulations, poor enforcement, or any combination of the three. We also found robust empirical evidence that between 2009 and 2018, on average, gold-mining firms neither strongly increased nor strongly decreased their transient or their persistent technical and environmental efficiency. Besides, firms with high technical efficiency simultaneously have high environmental efficiency, which suggests that promoting high environmental efficiency will also promote high technical efficiency.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental efficiency, technical efficiency, persistent and transient efficiency, gold mine.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation

References

Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37. Arabi, B., Munisamy, S., Emrouznejad, A., & Shadman, F. (2014). Power industry restructuring and eco-efficiency changes: A new slacks-based model in Malmquist–Luenberger Index measurement. Energy Policy, 68, 132-145. Badunenko, O., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2016). When, where and how to estimate persistent and transient efficiency in stochastic frontier panel data models. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(1), 272-287. Bainton, N., & Holcombe, S. (2018). A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure. Resources Policy, 59, 468-478. Battese, G. E., &and Coelli, T. J. (1992). , “Frontier pProduction fFunctions, tTechnical eEfficiency and pPanel dData: With aApplication to pPaddy fFarmers in India.,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-1–69. Baumol, W. J., Baumol, W. J., Oates, W. E., Baumol, W. J., Bawa, V. S., Bawa, W. S., & Bradford, D. F. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge Uuniversity Ppress. Bjorn, S. (2000). Eco-efficiency: Creating more value with less impact. Conches-Geneva: WBCSD, 5-36. Botin, J. A. (2009). Sustainable Management of Mining Operations. Society for Mining, Metallurgy an Exploration,. Inc. Englewood, CO. Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Solís, D., López, V. H. M., Maripani, J. F., Thiam, A., & Rivas, T. (2007). Technical efficiency in farming: Aa meta-regression analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 27(1), 57-72. Carvalho, F. P. (2017). Mining industry and sustainable development: Ttime for change. Food and Energy Security, 6(2), 61-77. Chung, Y. H., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229-240. Coelli, T., Lauwers, L., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2007). Environmental efficiency measurement and the materials balance condition. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(1-2), 3-12. Colombi, R., Kumbhakar, S. C., Martini, G. &and Vittadini, G. (2014). , “Closed-sSkew nNormality in sStochastic fFrontiers with iIndividual eEffects and lLong/sShort-rRun eEfficiency.,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(2), 123-1–36. Colombi, R., Martini, G., & Vittadini, G. (2017). Determinants of transient and persistent hospital efficiency: The case of Italy. Health economics, 26, 5-22. Cornwell, C., Schmidt, P., &and Sickles, R. C. (1990)., “Production fFrontiers with cCross-sSectional and tTime-sSeries vVariation in eEfficiency lLevels.,” Journal of Econometrics, 46, 185-–200. De Koeijer, T. J., Wossink, G. A. A., Smit, A. B., Janssens, S. R. M., Renkema, J. A., & Struik, P. C. (2003). Assessment of the quality of farmers’ environmental management and its effects on resource use efficiency: Aa Dutch case study. Agricultural Systems, 78(1), 85-103. Dubiński, J. (2013). Sustainable development of mining mineral resources. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 12(1), 1-6. Dunlop, T., & Corbera, E. (2016). Incentivizing REDD+: How developing countries are laying the groundwork for benefit-sharing. Environmental Science & Policy, 63, 44-54. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Hernandez-Sancho, F. (2004). Environmental performance: Aan index number approach. Resource and Energy Economics, 26(4), 343-352. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. K., & Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90-98. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. K., & Yaisawarng, S. (1993). Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: Aa distance function approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 374-380. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Noh, D. W., & Weber, W. (2005). Characteristics of a polluting technology: Ttheory and practice. Journal of Econometrics, 126(2), 469-492. Fernandez, C., Koop, G., & Steel, M. F. J. (2002). Multiple-output production with undesirable outputs: an application to nitrogen surplus in agriculture. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458), 432-442. Filippini, M., & Greene, W. (2016). Persistent and transient productive inefficiency: a maximum simulated likelihood approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 45(2), 187-196. Filippini, M., Geissmann, T., & Greene, W. H. (2018). Persistent and transient cost efficiency – —an application to the Swiss hydropower sector. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 49(1), 65-77. Forsund, F. R. (20089). “Good mModelling of bBad oOutputs: Pollution and mMultiple-oOutput pProduction.,” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 1-–38. Frisch, R. (1965). A Survey of the Problems of a Dynamic Theory of Production. In Theory of Production (pp. 293-294). Springer, Dordrecht. Godoy-Durán, Á., Galdeano-Gómez, E., Pérez-Mesa, J. C., & Piedra-Muñoz, L. (2017). Assessing eco-efficiency and the determinants of horticultural family-farming in southeast Spain. Journal of Environmental Management, 204, 594-604. Gorain, B. K., Kondos, P. D., & Lakshmanan, V. I. (2016). Innovations in gold and silver processing. In Innovative Process Development in Metallurgical Industry (pp. 393-428). Springer, Cham. Graham, D., & Woods, N. (2006). Making corporate self-regulation effective in developing countries. World Development, 34(5), 868-883. Greene, W. (2010). A stochastic frontier model with correction for sample selection. Journal of productivity analysis, 34(1), 15-24. Greene, W. H. (2005a). , “Fixed and tRandom eEffects in sStochastic fFrontier mModels.,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 7-–32. Greene, W. H. (2005b). , “Reconsidering hHeterogeneity in pPanel dData eEstimators of the sStochastic fFrontier mModel.,” Journal of Econometrics, 126, 269-–303. Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Ppoverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525-548. Hailu, A., and Veeman, T. S. (2001). , “Non-pParametric pProductivity aAnalysis with uUndesirable oOutputs: An aApplication to the Canadian pPulp and pPaper iIndustry.,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 605-6–16. Halkos, G. E., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2012). Industry performance evaluation with the use of financial ratios: An application of bootstrapped DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5872-5880. Handl, G. (2012). Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment (Stockholm Declaration), 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, 1992. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, 11. Heshmati, A., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Kim, J. (2018). Persistent and transient efficiency of international airlines. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 18(2). Hua, Z., Bian, Y., & Liang, L. (2007). Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: Aan extended DEA approach. Omega, 35(5), 578-587. Hua, Z., Bian, Y., & Liang, L. (2007). Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach. Omega, 35(5), 578-587. Kumah, A. (2006). Sustainability and gold mining in the developing world. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(3-4), 315-323. Kumbhakar, S. C. (1987). Production frontiers and panel data: an application to US class 1 railroads. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 5(2), 249-255. Kumbhakar, S. C. (1990). Production frontiers, panel data, and time-varying technical inefficiency. Journal of econometrics, 46(1-2), 201-211. Kumbhakar, S. C. (1991). , “The mMeasurement and dDecomposition of cCost-iInefficiency: The tTranslog cCost sSystem.,” Oxford Economic Papers, 43, 667-–83. Kumbhakar, S. C., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1995). Labour‐use efficiency in Swedish social insurance offices. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(1), 33-47. Kumbhakar, S. C., & Tsionas, E. G. (2016). The good, the bad and the technology: Endogeneity in environmental production models. Journal of Econometrics, 190(2), 315-327. Kumbhakar, S. C., and Heshmati, A. (1995), “Efficiency Measurement in Swedish Dairy Farms: An Application of Rotating Panel Data, 1976–88,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 660–74. Kumbhakar, S. C., and Heshmati, A. (1995). , “Efficiency mMeasurement in Swedish dDairy fFarms: An aApplication of rRotating pPanel dData, 1976-–88.,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 660-–74. Kumbhakar, S. C., and Hjalmarsson, L. (1993). , “Technical eEfficiency and tTechnical pProgress in Swedish dDairy fFarms. In,” Fried H., Schmidt S. and Lovell, C. A. K. (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press. Kumbhakar, S. C., and Hjalmarsson, L. (1998). , “Relative pPerformance of pPublic and pPrivate oOwnership under yYardstick cCompetition: Electricity rRetail dDistribution.,” European Economic Review, 42, 97-–122. Kumbhakar, S. C., and Wang, H. -J. (2005). , “Estimation of gGrowth cConvergence uUsing a sStochastic pProduction fFrontier aApproach.,” Economics Letters, 88, 300-–5. Kumbhakar, S. C., Lien, G., & Hardaker, J. B. (2014). Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 321-337. Kumbhakar, S. C., Wang, H. J., & Horncastle, A. P. (2015). A Ppractitioner's Gguide to Sstochastic Ffrontier Aanalysis Uusing Stata. Cambridge University Press. Kuosmanen, T., & Kortelainen, M. (2005). Measuring eco‐efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 59-72. Lansink, A. O., & Bezlepkin, I. (2003). The effect of heating technologies on CO2 and energy efficiency of Dutch greenhouse firms. Journal of Environmental Management, 68(1), 73-82. Lansink, A. O., & Silva, E. (2003). CO 2 and energy efficiency of different heating technologies in the Dutch glasshouse industry. Environmental and Resource Economics, 24(4), 395-407. Lee, J. D., Park, J. B., and Kim, T. Y. (2002). , “Estimation of the shadow prices of pollutants with production/environment inefficiency taken into account: Aa nonparametric directional distance function approach. ,” Journal of Environmental Management, 64(4), 365-–75. Lee, Y. H., & Schmidt, P. (1993). A production frontier model with flexible temporal variation in technical efficiency. The Mmeasurement of Pproductive Eefficiency: Techniques and Aapplications, 237-255. Mahdiloo, M., Saen, R. F., & Lee, K. H. (2015). Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: An extension and application of data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 279-289. Meeusen, W., & van den Broeck, J. (1977). Technical efficiency and dimension of the firm: Some results on the use of frontier production functions. Empirical economics, 2(2), 109-122. Mombeuil, C. (2020). Institutional conditions, sustainable energy, and the UN sustainable development discourse: A focus on Haiti. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120-153. Mudd, G. M. (2007). Global trends in gold mining: Towards quantifying environmental and resource sustainability. Resources Policy, 32(1-2), 42-56. Mundlak, Y. (1961). , “Aggregation over tTime in dDistributed lLag mModels.,” International Economic Review, 2, 154-–63. Murty, S., & Russell, R. R. (2002). On modeling pollution-generating technologies., Department of Economics, University of California, Riverside. Discussion papers series, (0(02-14)). Murty, S., & Russell, R. R. (2018). Modeling emission-generating technologies: reconciliation of axiomatic and by-production approaches. Empirical Economics, 54(1), 7-30. Murty, S., Russell, R., and Levkoff, S. B. (2012)., “On Modeling Pollution-Generating Technologies.,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64, 117-–35. Neingo, P. N., & Tholana, T. (2016). Trends in productivity in the South African gold mining industry. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 116(3), 283-290. Oliveira, R., Camanho, A. S., & Zanella, A. (2017). Expanded eco-efficiency assessment of large mining firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2364-2373. Oude Lansink, A., & Van dDer Vlist, A. (2008). Non‐parametric modelling of CO2 emission quota. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(3), 487-497. Oude Lansink, A., & Van Der Vlist, A. (2008). Non‐parametric modelling of CO2 emission quota. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(3), 487-497. Pethig, R. (2006). Non-linear production, abatement, pollution and materials balance reconsidered. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51(2), 185-204. Pimentel, B. S., Gonzalez, E. S., & Barbosa, G. N. (2016). Decision-support models for sustainable mining networks: Fundamentals and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2145-2157. Piot‐Lepetit, I., & Vermersch, D. (1998). Pricing organic nitrogen under the weak disposability assumption: Aan application to the French pig sector. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 85-99. Pitt, M. M., & Lee, L. F. (1981). The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of development economics, 9(1), 43-64. Rashidi, K., & Saen, R. F. (2015). Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Economics, 50, 18-26. Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. K., & Thijssen, G. (1999). Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: Aan application to Dutch dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(1), 44-60. Reinhard, S., Lovell, C. K., & Thijssen, G. J. (2000). Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(2), 287-303. Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Guest Article: The Business of Sustainable Development. Finance and Development, 29(4), 24. Schmidt, P., &and Sickles, R. C. (1984). , “Production fFrontiers and pPanel dData.,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2, 367-–74. Serra, T., Chambers, R. G., & Lansink, A. O. (2014). Measuring technical and environmental efficiency in a state-contingent technology. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(2), 706-717. Shafiee, S., & Topal, E. (2010). An overview of global gold market and gold price forecasting. Resources Policy, 35(3), 178-189. Smith. J., & John. R. (2010). Globally fit leadership: four steps forward. Journal of Global Responsibility. 55-65. Tamini, L.ota D., Bruno Larue, B., &and Gale West, G. (2012). "Technical and environmental efficiencies and best management practices in agriculture." Applied Economics, 44(.13), 1659-1672. Thiam, A., Bravo‐Ureta, B. E., & Rivas, T. E. (2001). Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: Aa meta‐analysis. Agricultural Economics, 25(2‐3), 235-243. Tsionas, E. G., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2014). Firm heterogeneity, persistent and transient technical inefficiency: A generalized true random‐effects model. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 29(1), 110-132. Tsionas, EM. G., Malikov, E., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2020). Endogenous dynamic efficiency in the intertemporal optimization models of firm behavior. European Journal of Operational Research, 284(1), 313-324. Tyteca, D. (1996). On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms – —a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 46(3), 281-308. Tyteca, D. (1997). Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms – —concepts and empirical results. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8(2), 183-197. World Gold Council (2019). The World Gold Council 2018 Annual Review. London: World Gold Council Publisher. Wossink, A., & Denaux, Z. S. (2006). Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production. Agricultural Systems, 90(1-3), 312-328. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Wang, H. (2012). Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(3), 625-635. Zofı́o, J. L., & Prieto, A. M. (2001). Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: Tthe case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 23(1), 63-83.