The U.S. Great Recession Experience. The Reasons why Losses in Jobs and in Home Equity Savings reinforced each other

De Koning, Kees (2021): The U.S. Great Recession Experience. The Reasons why Losses in Jobs and in Home Equity Savings reinforced each other.

Abstract

In a previous paper: “Quantitative Easing Home Equity: an Alternative Economic Management Tool” (MPRA Paper 106528), the writer did analyze some of the Great Recession’s experiences for different groups of U.S. households. In Q4 2005, the home equity level stood at $14.4 trillion for all households. As a result of the Great Recession this level dropped to $8.2 trillion by Q1 2012. This loss in wealth level lasted the longest for the bottom 50% of households. For this group it took over 10 years which was nearly 5 years longer than for the two household groups making up the top 50% of households. The latter groups took five years to get back to the income and wealth levels as assessed in 2007.

Why was losing $6.2 trillion in home equity savings over the period Q4 2005 to Q1 2012 such a disaster?

The first aspect is the value of savings made and the recovery period to earn back such savings losses. A savings loss of 43% on home values was an extreme percentage of losses, mainly due to two factors. The first was the reinforcement factor. When doubts crept into the mortgage backed securities markets in 2007, the snowball started rolling. Banks and other financial companies as well as some households were over extended. Defaults started to go up and the mood in the markets turned from overly optimistic to severely negative. Foreclosure levels were racing up and unemployment levels increased rapidly.

The second aspect was the relationship between house prices and the home equity savings levels embedded in such home values. A home is for nearly all households a necessity rather than a luxury. If a household cannot afford to buy outright, a mortgage is often needed as the household will still need a place to live in. The downward housing prices –from a U.S. average of $257,400 in Q1 2007 to the bottom of $208,400 in Q1 2009 and back to $258,400 by Q1 2013 brought on a misery for many U.S. households.

This paper will attempt to show that there can be a different solution to such market upheaval: a reversal method that helps households to spend more of their home equity level when needed. The household’s macro economic motto could be: “Save in good times and spend from your home equity in economic downturns”. To make it a success, a system needs to be developed to make such spending possible.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: U.S.Great Recession period; home equity in U.S.; home mortgage levels, home wealth levels; a household help to buy scheme based on home equity
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E42 - Monetary Systems ; Standards ; Regimes ; Government and the Monetary System ; Payment Systems; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook

References

1. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Households; Owners’ Equity in Real Estate level; 1980-2020 https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/OEHRENWBSHNO

2. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Household and Nonprofit Organizations; One-to-Four Family Residences Mortgages, Liability,Level https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/HHMSDODNS

3. Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System; Washington D.C.; Distribution of Household Wealth in the U.S. since 1989; https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/dataviz/dfa/distribute/table/#ra

4.Microsoft Bing; Wall Street Dow Jones Industrial Share Index 2007-2013 https://www.bing.com/search?q=wall+street+industrial+share+index&form=PRGBEN&httpsmsn=1&msnews=1&refig=6b3e259e38b44190833acb5e1bd54564&sp=1&qs=HS&pq=wall+street+&sk=PRES1&sc=8-12&cvid=6b3e259e38b44

5. The Balance.com; Current U.S. Federal Government Tax Receipts, 2008-2013 https://www.thebalance.com/current-u-s-federal-government-tax-revenue-3305762

6. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Total Assets (Less Eliminations from Consolidation) Wednesday Level. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WALCL

7. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Federal Government Current Expenditures; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FGEXPND

8.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Federal Surplus or Deficit https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSD

9. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; Effective Fed Funds Rate https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DFF

10. Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis; Federal Debt; Total Public Debt as Percentage of Gross Domestic product; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GFDEGDQ188S

11. World Bank; Washington; U.S. Nominal GDP in 2007 and in 2019; https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=US