The Barnett Critique

Barnett, William A. and Park, Hyun and Park, Sohee (2021): The Barnett Critique.

Abstract

The Barnett critique states that there is an internal inconsistency between the theory that is implied by simple sum monetary aggregation (perfect substitutability among components) and the economic theory that produces the models within which those aggregates are used. That inconsistency causes the appearance of unstable demand and supply for money. The incorrect inference of unstable money demand has caused serious harm to the field of monetary economics. The appearance of instability of the demand for money function disappears, if the relevant neoclassical microeconomic aggregation and index number theories are used to produce the monetary aggregates, which then would nest properly within the money demand functions. In fact, studies of the demand for money function using competently produced monetary aggregates and state-of-the-art demand system modeling methodology have found the demand for money function to be more stable and more easily modeled than the demand for most other consumer goods. See, e.g., Barnett and Serletis (2000, chapters 2, 7, 9, 16, 17, 18, 24), Barnett and Chauvet (2011, chapters 1, 4, 7), and Barnett (2012, pp. 92-110).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Divisia monetary aggregates; demand for money; Barnett critique; index number theory; aggregation theory.
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply ; Credit ; Money Multipliers

References

Anderson, L. C and J. L. Jordan (1968), Monetary and Fiscal Actions: A Test of Their Relative Importance in Economic Stabilization, St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank Review, 50, November, 11-23.

Barnett, W. A. (1978), The User Cost of Money, Economics Letters 1, 145-149. Reprinted in Barnett, W. A. and Serletis, A. (eds.) (2000) The Theory of Monetary Aggregation, North Holland, Amsterdam, 6-10.

Barnett, W. A. (1980), Economic Monetary Aggregates: An Application of Aggregation and Index Number Theory, Journal of Econometrics, 14(1), 11-48. Reprinted in Barnett, W. A. and Serletis, A. (eds.) (2000) The Theory of Monetary Aggregation, North Holland, Amsterdam, 11-48.

Barnett, W. A. (1987), The Microeconomic Theory of Monetary Aggregation, New Approaches to Monetary Economics, 115-168. Reprinted in Barnett, W. A. and Serletis, A. (eds.) (2000) The Theory of Monetary Aggregation, North Holland, Amsterdam, 49-99.

Barnett, W. A. (2012), Getting It Wrong: How Faulty Monetary Statistics Undermine the Fed, the Financial System, and the Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Barnett, W. A. and M. Chauvet (eds.)(2011), Financial Aggregation and Index Number Theory, World Scientific, Singapore.

Barnett, W. A. and Serletis, A. (eds.) (2000) The Theory of Monetary Aggregation, North Holland, Amsterdam.

Barnett, W. A. and Su, L. (2016), Joint Aggregation over Money and Credit Card Services under Risk, Economics Bulletin, 36(4), 2301-2310.

Barnett, W. A. and Su, L. (2018), Financial Firm Production of Inside Monetary and Credit Card Services: An Aggregation Theoretic Approach, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24(1), 1-31.

Barnett, W. A., Chauvet, M. and Leiva-Leon, D. (2016), Real-time Nowcasting of Nominal GDP with Structural Breaks, Journal of Econometrics, 191, 312-324.

Barnett, W. A., Offenbacher, E. K, and P. A. Spindt (1984), The New Divisia Monetary Aggregates, Journal of Political Economy 92, 1049-1085. Reprinted in Barnett, W. A. and Serletis, A. (eds.) (2000) The Theory of Monetary Aggregation, North Holland, Amsterdam, 360-388.

Barnett, W. A., Chauvet, M., Leiva-Leon, D. and Su, L. (2016), The Credit-Card-Services Augmented Divisia Monetary Aggregates, MPRA Paper 73245, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Belongia, M. T. and Ireland, P. N. (2014), The Barnett Critique after Three Decades: A New Keynesian Analysis, Journal of Econometrics, 183, 5-21.

Chrystal, A. K. and R. MacDonald (1994), Empirical Evidence on the Recent Behaviour and Usefulness of Simple-Sum and Weighted Measures of the Money Stock, St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank Review 76, 73-109.

Ellington, M. (2018), The Case for Divisia Monetary Statistics: A Bayesian Time-Varying Approach, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 96, 26-41.

Keating, J. W. and Smith, A. L. (2019), The optimal monetary instrument and the (mis)use of causality tests, Journal of Financial Stability, 42, 90-99.

Schunk, D. L. (2001), The Relative Forecasting Performance of the Divisia and Simple Sum Monetary Aggregates, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 33(2), 272-283.