Okedina, Jellil and Masih, Mansur (2018): The nexus between poverty and crime: evidence from India.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_109263.pdf Download (270kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper tests the theoretical relationship between poverty and crime in India. The motivation is the U.S. diplomatic reports on crime that indicated violent crime rates in India increased by 15.1% even though poverty rate decreased by 0.625% within the same period. To explore the relationship between crime and poverty the standard time series techniques are applied. India is taken as a case study. The results indicate that there is a co-integration between crime and poverty. However, crime is found to be more exogenous than poverty. This finding corroborates with earlier studies in the literature that poverty plays insignificant role in driving crime but crime may keep people in poverty due to factors such as, crime record and education. The implication of the result is that the Indian government needs to strengthen the criminal justice system to fight crime while ensuring a fair distribution of wealth.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The nexus between poverty and crime: evidence from India |
English Title: | The nexus between poverty and crime: evidence from India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Crime, Poverty, VECM, VDC, India |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty |
Item ID: | 109263 |
Depositing User: | Professor Mansur Masih |
Date Deposited: | 21 Aug 2021 13:47 |
Last Modified: | 21 Aug 2021 13:47 |
References: | Agnew, R. (2010). A general strain theory of terrorism. Theoretical Criminology, 14(2), 131-153. Chintrakarn, P., & Herzer, D. (2012). More inequality, more crime? A panel cointegration analysis for the United States. Economic Letters, 116, 389-391. Cortes, D., Santamaria, J., & Vargas, J. F. (2016). Economic shocks and crime: Evidence from the crash of Ponzi schemes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, 263-275. Coster, S., & Kort-Butler, L. (2006). How general is general strain theory? Assessing determinacy and indeterminacy across life domains. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43(4), 297-325. Enamorado, T., & Winkler, H. (2016). Income inequality and violent crime: Evidence from Mexico’s drug war. Journal of Development Economics, 120, 128-143. Fajnzylber, P., Lederman, D., & Loayza, N. (2002). Inequality and violent crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 42(3), 1-40. Harris, A. R., & Shaw, J. A. W. (2000). Looking for patterns: Race, class, and crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 10(2), 15-38. Hovel, A. (2014). Crime, income inequality, and density at the neighborhood level. Journal of Development Economics, 112, 89-96. Iceland, J., & Hernandez, E. (2016). Understanding trends in concentrated poverty: 1980-2014. Social Science Research, 10, 1-21. Jacob, A. (2011). Economic theories of crime and delinquency. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21(3), 270-283. Scorzafave, L., G. & Milena, K., S. (2009). Income inequality and pecuniary crimes. Journal of Economic Letters, 104, 40-46. Zembroski, D. (2011). Theories of crime and delinquency from multiple social science perspectives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21(3), 240-254. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/109263 |