Cascavilla, Alessandro and Caferra, Rocco and Morone, Andrea (2021): The green and the dark side of distance learning: from environmental quality to economic inequality.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_110702.pdf Download (397kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We assess the impact of e-learning during the COVID-19 analyzing a sample of Italian university students. In particular, we point out how the subjective distance learning evaluation is determined according to: i) students’ profile and different proxies of monetary incentives favoring distance learning, ii) pro-environmental preferences and iii) socio-economic concerns in the light of potential unequal access to digital learning resources. Our results show prominent the impact that green preferences have in fostering a post COVID-19 e-learning era, while some doubts on the potential future economic inequalities generated by an unequal access to educational resources are raised. From here, different policy implications are proposed to balance the pros and cons of distance learning, considering both social, financial, and technological factors.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The green and the dark side of distance learning: from environmental quality to economic inequality |
English Title: | The green and the dark side of distance learning: from environmental quality to economic inequality |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | distance learning, pro-environmental attitude; economic inequality; public policy |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth |
Item ID: | 110702 |
Depositing User: | Mr Alessandro Cascavilla |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2021 09:26 |
Last Modified: | 23 Nov 2021 09:26 |
References: | Alzahrani, L., & Seth, K. P. (2021). Factors influencing students’ satisfaction with continuous use of learning management systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-19. Appolloni, A., Colasanti, N., Fantauzzi, C., Fiorani, G., & Frondizi, R. (2021). Distance learning as a resilience strategy during Covid-19: An analysis of the Italian context. Sustainability, 13(3), 1388. Bashitialshaaer, R., Alhendawi, M., & Lassoued, Z. (2021). Obstacle Comparisons to Achieving Distance Learning and Applying Electronic Exams during COVID-19 Pandemic. Symmetry, 13(1), 99. Caferra, R., Colasante, A., & Morone, A. (2021). Who Is Afraid Of The Dark? Some Evidence From A Cross-Country Investigation. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 1-10. Chatterji, P., & Li, Y. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 on school enrollment. Economics of Education Review, 83, 102128. Cicha, K., Rizun, M., Rutecka, P., & Strzelecki, A. (2021). COVID-19 and higher education: first-year students’ expectations toward distance learning. Sustainability, 13(4), 1889. Corak, M. (2013). Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 79-102. Costantini, V., Martini, C. (2010). A Modified Environmental Kuznets Curve for sustainable development assessment using panel data. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 10(1/2), 84-122. De Angelis, M., Santonicola, M., & Montefusco, C. (2020). In presenza oa distanza? Alcuni principi e pratiche per una didattica efficace. FORMAZIONE & INSEGNAMENTO. Rivista internazionale di Scienze dell'educazione e della formazione, 18(3), 67-78. Devkota, K. R. (2021). Inequalities reinforced through online and distance education in the age of COVID-19: The case of higher education in Nepal. International Review of Education, 1-21. European Council, 2020. Joint Statement of the Members of the European Council, 26 March 2020. URL https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/43076/26-vc-euco-statement-en.pdf Ferrer‐i‐Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?. The economic journal, 114(497), 641-659. González-Betancor, S. M., López-Puig, A. J., & Cardenal, M. E. (2021). Digital inequality at home. The school as compensatory agent. Computers & Education, 168, 104195. Holland, T.G., Peterson, G.D., Gonzalez, A. (2009). A Cross-National Analysis of How Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss. Conservation Biology, 23(5), 1304-13013. Islam, S. Nazrul, (2015). Inequality and Environmental Sustainability. Department of Economic & Social Affairs, United Nations. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45, pp. 1-28. Maclean, R. (2003). Equality of opportunity in education. In International Handbook of Educational Research in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 143-154). Springer, Dordrecht. Magnani, E. (2000). The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecological Economics, 32, 431-443 Marsiliani, L. and Renstrom, T. I., (2003). On Income Inequality and Green Preferences. Mirza, M. U., Richter, A., van Nes, E. H., & Scheffer, M. (2019). Technology driven inequality leads to poverty and resource depletion. Ecological Economics, 160, 215-226. Qazi, A., Qazi, J., Naseer, K., Zeeshan, M., Qazi, S., Abayomi-Alli, O., ... & Haruna, K. (2021). Adaption of distance learning to continue the academic year amid COVID-19 lockdown. Children and Youth Services Review, 126, 106038. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., & Keltner, D. (2018). Unpacking the inequality paradox: The psychological roots of inequality and social class. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 53–124). UN General Assembly, (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Van Reenen, J. (2011) Wage inequality, technology and trade: 21st century evidence. Labour Economics, 18 (6). pp. 730-741. Versteijlen, M., Salgado, F. P., Groesbeek, M. J., & Counotte, A. (2017). Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the Netherlands. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 28, 80-89. Wilkinson R.G., Pickett K.E. (2010). The impact of income inequalities on sustainable development in London. London Sustainable Development Commission Wilkinson R.G, Pickett K.E. (2010). The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone. Penguin, 2010. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110702 |