Badunenko, Oleg and Henderson, Daniel J. (2021): Production Analysis with Asymmetric Noise.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_110888.pdf Download (952kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Symmetric noise is the prevailing assumption in production analysis, but it is often violated in practice. Not only does asymmetric noise cause least-squares models to be inefficient, it can hide important features of the data which may be useful to the firm/policymaker. Here we outline how to introduce asymmetric noise into a production or cost framework as well as develop a model to introduce inefficiency into said models. We derive closed-form solutions for the convolution of the noise and inefficiency distributions, the log-likelihood function, and inefficiency, as well as show how to introduce determinants of heteroskedasticity, efficiency and skewness to allow for heterogenous results. We perform a Monte Carlo study and profile analysis to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators. We outline R and Stata packages that we have developed and apply to three empirical applications to show how our methods lead to improved fit, explain features of the data hidden by assuming symmetry, and how our approach is still able to estimate efficiency scores when the least-squares model exhibits the well-known "wrong skewness" problem in production analysis.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Production Analysis with Asymmetric Noise |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | asymmetry, production, cost, efficiency, wrong skewness |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education |
Item ID: | 110888 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Oleg Badunenko |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2021 08:10 |
Last Modified: | 13 Dec 2021 08:10 |
References: | Adcock, C.J., 2005. Exploiting skewness to build an optimal hedge fund with a currency overlay. The European Journal of Finance 11, 445–462. Adcock, C.J., 2007. Extensions of Stein’s Lemma for the Skew-Normal Distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 36, 1661–1671. Adcock, C.J., 2010. Asset pricing and portfolio selection based on the multivariate extended skew-Student-t distribution. Annals of Operations Research 176, 221–234. Afriat, S.N., 1972. Efficiency Estimation of Production Functions. International Economic Review 13, 5–23. Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, P., 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37. Amsler, C., Prokhorov, A., Schmidt, P., 2016. Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Econometrics 190, 280–288. Aubuchon, C.P., Wheelock, D.C., 2010. The Geographic Distribution and Characteristics of U.S. Bank Failures, 2007-2010: Do Bank Failures Still Reflect Local Economic Conditions? Federal Bank of St. Louis Review 92, 395–415. Azzalini, A., 1985. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 12, 171–178. Azzalini, A., Capitanio, A., 1999. Statistical applications of the multivariate skew normal distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 61, 579–602. Azzalini, A., Capitanio, A., 2013. The Skew-Normal and Related Families. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Monographs, Cambridge University Press. Badunenko, O., Henderson, D.J., Kumbhakar, S.C., 2012. When, where and how to perform efficiency estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 175, 863–892. Badunenko, O., Kumbhakar, S.C., 2016. When, where and how to estimate persistent and transient efficiency in stochastic frontier panel data models. European Journal of Operational Research 255, 272–287. Ball, L., Mankiw, N.G., 1995. Relative-Price Changes as Aggregate Supply Shocks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 161–193. Bartelsman, E.J., Gray, W., 1996. The NBER Manufacturing Productivity Database. Working Paper 205. National Bureau of Economic Research. Bonanno, G., De Giovanni, D., Domma, F., 2017. The ‘wrong skewness’ problem: A respecification of stochastic frontiers. Journal of Productivity Analysis 47, 49–64. Caudill, S.B., Ford, J.M., Gropper, D.M., 1995. Frontier Estimation and Firm-Specific Inefficiency Measures in the Presence of Heteroscedasticity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13, 105–11. Chavas, J.P., Chambers, R.G., Pope, R.D., 2010. Production Economics and Farm Management: a Century of Contributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92, 356–375. Cho, C.K., Schmidt, P., 2020. The wrong skew problem in stochastic frontier models when inefficiency depends on environmental variables. Empirical Economics 58, 2031–2047. Day, R.H., 1965. Probability Distributions of Field Crop Yields. Journal of Farm Economics 47, 713–741. DiCiccio, T.J., Monti, A.C., 2004. Inferential Aspects of the Skew Exponential Power Distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99, 439–450. Dominguez-Molina, J.A., Gonzalez-Farias, G., Ramos-Quiroga, R., 2004. Coastal Flooding and the Multivariate Skew-t Distribution, in: Genton, M.G. (Ed.), Skew-Elliptical Distributions and Their Applications. 1st edition ed.. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York. chapter 14, pp. 243–258. Florens, J.P., Simar, L., Van Keilegom, I., 2020. Estimation of the Boundary of a Variable Observed With Symmetric Error. Journal of the American Statistical Association 115, 425–441. Genton, M.G. (Ed.), 2004. Skew-Elliptical Distributions and Their Applications: A Journey Beyond Normality. 1st edition ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York. Gershenson, S., Tekin, E., 2018. The Effect of Community Traumatic Events on Student Achievement: Evidence from the Beltway Sniper Attacks. Education Finance and Policy 13, 513–544. Goh, J.W., Lim, K.G., Sim, M., Zhang, W., 2012. Portfolio value-at-risk optimization for asymmetrically distributed asset returns. European Journal of Operational Research 221, 397–406. Greene, W.H., 2008. The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis, in: The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Change. Oxford University Press, New York. Hafner, C.M., Manner, H., Simar, L., 2018. The “wrong skewness” problem in stochastic frontier models: A new approach. Econometric Reviews 37, 380–400. Hanushek, E.A., 1979. Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources 14, 351–388. Horrace, W.C., 2005a. On ranking and selection from independent truncated normal distributions. Journal of Econometrics 126, 335–354. Current developments in productivity and efficiency measurement. Horrace, W.C., 2005b. Some results on the multivariate truncated normal distribution. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 94, 209–221. Horrace, W.C., Parmeter, C.F., 2018. A Laplace stochastic frontier model. Econometric Reviews 37, 260–280. Johnes, J., Portela, M., Thanassoulis, E., 2017. Efficiency in education. Journal of the Operational Research Society 68, 331–338. Jondrow, J., Lovell, C.A.K., Materov, I.S., Schmidt, P., 1982. On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model. Journal of Econometrics 19, 233–238. Jradi, S., Parmeter, C.F., Ruggiero, J., 2021. Quantile estimation of stochastic frontiers with the normal-exponential specification. European Journal of Operational Research . Just, R.E., Pope, R.D., 1978. Stochastic Specification of Production Functions and Economic Implications. Journal of Econometrics 7, 67–86. Koetter, M., Kolari, J.W., Spierdijk, L., 2012. Enjoying the Quiet Life Under Deregulation? Evidence from Adjusted Lerner Indices for U.S. Banks. Review of Economics and Statistics 94, 462–480. Koopmans, T.C., 1951. An Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities, in: Koopmans, T.C. (Ed.), Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, New York: Wiley. chapter 13. Kumbhakar, S.C., Ghosh, S., McGuckin, J.T., 1991. A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 9, 279–286. Kumbhakar, S.C., Tsionas, E.G., 2005. The Joint Measurement of Technical and Allocative Inefficiencies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 100, 736–747. Lacey, A., Cornell, D., 2013. The Impact of Teasing and Bullying on School-wide Academic Performance. Journal of Applied School Psychology 29, 262–283. Lai, H.p., Kumbhakar, S.C., 2018. Endogeneity in panel data stochastic frontier model with determinants of persistent and transient inefficiency. Economics Letters 162, 5–9. Levin, H.M., 1974. Measuring efficiency in educational production. Public Finance Quarterly 2, 3–24. Li, Q., 1996. Estimating a stochastic production frontier when the adjusted error is symmetric. Economics Letters 52, 221–228. Lien, G., Kumbhakar, S.C., Alem, H., 2018. Endogeneity, heterogeneity, and determinants of inefficiency in Norwegian crop-producing farms. International Journal of Production Economics 201, 53–61. Louis, H., Blenman, L.P., Thatcher, J.S., 1999. Interest Rate Parity and the Behavior of the Bid-Ask Spread. Journal of Financial Research 22, 189–206. Mao, Z., Liu, W., Feng, B., 2019. Opaque distribution channels for service providers with asymmetric capacities: Posted-price mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics 215, 112–120. Meeusen, W., van den Broeck, J., 1977. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 18, 435–444. Olson, J.A., Schmidt, P., Waldman, D.M., 1980. A Monte-Carlo study of estimators of stochastic frontier production functions. Journal of Econometrics 13, 67–82. Owen, D.B., 1956. Tables for Computing Bivariate Normal Probabilities. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27, 1075–1090. Owen, D.B., 1980. A table of normal integrals. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 9, 389–419. Papadopoulos, A., 2021. Stochastic frontier models using the Generalized Exponential distribution. Journal of Productivity Analysis 55, 15–29. Ponzo, M., 2013. Does bullying reduce educational achievement? an evaluation using matching estimators. Journal of Policy Modeling 35, 1057–1078. Qi, L., Bravo-Ureta, B.E., Cabrera, V.E., 2015. From cold to hot: Climatic effects and productivity in Wisconsin dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 8664–8677. Restrepo-Tobon, D., Kumbhakar, S.C., 2014. Enjoying the Quiet Life Under Deregulation? Not Quite. Journal of Applied Econometrics 29, 333–343. Ritter, C., Bates, D.M., 1996. Profile methods, in: Prat, A. (Ed.), COMPSTAT, Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg. pp. 123–134. Ruggiero, J., 1996. Efficiency of educational production: An analysis of New York school districts. Review of Economics and Statistics 78, 499–509. Ruggiero, J., 2006. Measurement error, education production and data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review 25, 327–333. Special Issue: In Honor of W. Pierce Liles. Ruggiero, J., 2019. The Choice of Comparable DMUs and Environmental Variables. Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp. 123–144. Schmidt, P., 2011. One-Step and Two-Step Estimation in SFA Models. Journal of Productivity Analysis 36, 201–203. Shaik, S., 2013. Crop Insurance Adjusted Panel Data Envelopment Analysis Efficiency Measures. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95, 1155–1177. Simar, L., Wilson, P.W., 2009. Inferences from cross-sectional, stochastic frontier models. Econometric Reviews 29, 62–98. Stead, A.D., Wheat, P., Greene, W.H., 2019. Distributional Forms in Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp. 225–274. Stevenson, R.E., 1980. Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. Journal of Econometrics 13, 57–66. Sun, K., Henderson, D.J., Kumbhakar, S.C., 2011. Biases in approximating log production. Journal of Applied Econometrics 26, 708–714. Thanassoulis, E., De Witte, K., Johnes, J., Johnes, G., Karagiannis, G., Portela, C.S., 2016. Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis in Education. Springer US, Boston, MA. pp. 367–438. Thanassoulis, E., Dey, P.K., Petridis, K., Goniadis, I., Georgiou, A.C., 2017. Evaluating higher education teaching performance using combined analytic hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 68, 431–445. Thanassoulis, E., Sotiros, D., Koronakos, G., Despotis, D., 2018. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of university academic recruitment and promotion policies. European Journal of Operational Research 264, 742–755. Thanssoulis, E., 1999. Setting achievement targets for school children. Education Economics 7, 101–119. Wang, H.j., Schmidt, P., 2002. One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 129–144. Wei, Z., Zhu, X., Wang, T., 2021. The extended skew-normal-based stochastic frontier model with a solution to ‘wrong skewness’ problem. Statistics, in press. Wheat, P., Stead, A.D., Greene, W.H., 2019. Robust stochastic frontier analysis: a Student’s t-half normal model with application to highway maintenance costs in England. Journal of Productivity Analysis 51, 21–38. de Witte, K., Lopez-Torres, L., 2017. Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society 68, 339–363. de Witte, K., Thanassoulis, E., Simpson, G., Battisti, G., Charlesworth-May, A., 2010. Assessing pupil and school performance by non-parametric and parametric techniques. Journal of the Operational Research Society 61, 1224–1237. Yao, F., Zhang, F., Kumbhakar, S.C., 2019. Semiparametric smooth coefficient stochastic frontier model with panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 37, 556–572. Yao, W., Zhao, Z., 2013. Kernel density-based linear regression estimate. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 42, 4499–4512. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110888 |