Effects of patent policy on growth and inequality: A perspective of exogenous and endogenous quality improvements

Lu, You-Xun and Lai, Ching-Chong (2021): Effects of patent policy on growth and inequality: A perspective of exogenous and endogenous quality improvements.

Abstract

In this study, we explore the effects of patent protection on growth and inequality under exogenous versus endogenous quality improvements. With an exogenous step size of quality improvement, strengthening patent protection promotes economic growth; the strengthening in patent protection has an ambiguous effect on income inequality but a negative effect on consumption inequality. However, with an endogenous step size, the growth effect of patent protection becomes ambiguous; the strengthening in patent protection still has an ambiguous effect on income inequality but a negative effect on consumption inequality. Under our calibrated parameter values, we find that strengthening patent protection raises the degree of income inequality under exogenous quality improvements. In the case of endogenous quality improvements, our results show that the strengthening in patent protection has an inverted-U effect on economic growth; both income inequality and consumption inequality decrease with the strength of patent protection.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: innovation, patent protection, economic growth, inequality
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Acemoglu, D., 1998. Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1055–1089.

Acemoglu, D., 2002. Directed technical change. The Review of Economic Studies, 69, 781–809.

Acemoglu, D., and Cao, D., 2015. Innovation by entrants and incumbents. Journal of Economic Theory, 157, 255–294.

Acemoglu, D., and Akcigit, U., 2012. Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 1–42.

Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Bergeaud, A., Blundell, R., and Hemous, D., 2019. Innovation and top income inequality. The Review of Economic Studies, 86, 1–45.

Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., and Howitt, P., 2014. What do we learn from Schumpeterian growth theory? Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 2, 515–563.

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323–351.

Akcigit, U., Hanley, D., and Serrano-Velarde, N., 2021. Back to basics: Basic research spillovers, innovation policy and growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 88, 1–43.

Akcigit, U., and Kerr, W., 2018. Growth through heterogeneous innovations. Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1374–1443.

Atkinson, A., 2000. The changing distribution of income: Evidence and explanations. German Economic Review, 1, 3–18.

Atkinson, A., 2003. Income inequality in OECD countries: Data and explanations. CESifo Economic Studies, 49, 479–513.

Becker, B., 2015. Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29, 917–942.

Bessen, J., and Maskin, E., 2009. Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation. RAND Journal of Economics, 40, 611–635.

Blundell, R., Pistaferri, L., and Preston, I., 2008. Consumption inequality and partial insurance. American Economic Review, 98, 1887–1921.

Caballero, R., Jaffe, A., 2002. How high are the giants’ shoulders: an empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In: Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. (Eds.), Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 89–152.

Chou, C.-F., and Talmain, G., 1996. Redistribution and growth: Pareto improvements. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 505–523.

Chu, A., 2009. Effects of blocking patent policy on R&D: A quantitative DGE analysis. Journal of Economic Growth, 14, 55–78.

Chu, A., 2010. Effects of patent policy on income and consumption inequality in an R&D growth model. Southern Economic Journal, 77, 336–350.

Chu, A., and Cozzi, G., 2018. Effects of patents versus R&D subsidies on income inequality. Review of Economic Dynamics, 29, 68–84.

Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Fan, H., Furukawa, Y., and Liao, C., 2019. Innovation and inequality in a monetary Schumpeterian model with heterogeneous households and firms. Review of Economic Dynamics, 34, 141–164.

Chu, A., and Furukawa, Y., 2011. On the optimal mix of patent instruments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 1964–1975.

Chu, A., Furukawa, Y., Mallick, S., Peretto, P., and Wang, X., 2021. Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a Schumpeterian economy. Economic Theory, 71, 1429–1465.

Chu, A., and Pan, S., 2013. The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 17, 955–969.

Cozzi, G., 2007. The Arrow effect under competitive R&D. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 7(1), Article 2.

Cozzi, G., and Galli, S., 2014. Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 19, 183–219.

Cozzi, G., Giordani, P., and Zamparelli, L., 2007. The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 788–797.

Cysne, R., and Turchick, D., 2012. Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth revisited. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36, 851–861.

Foellmi, R., and Zweimuller, J., 2006. Income distribution and demand-induced innovations. The Review of Economic Studies, 73, 941–960.

Furukawa, Y., 2007. The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: Is stronger always better?. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31, 3644–3670.

Futagami, K., and Iwaisako, T., 2007. Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Theory, 132, 306–334.

Goh, A., and Olivier, J., 2002. Optimal patent protection in a two-sector economy. International Economic Review, 43, 1191–1214.

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43–61.

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 2018. Growth, trade, and inequality. Econometrica, 86, 37–83.

Hu, R., Yang, Y., and Zheng, Z., 2021. Inflation, endogenous quality increment, and economic growth. Mathematical Social Sciences, 114, 72–86.

Iwaisako, T., 2020. Welfare effects of patent protection in a semi-endogenous growth model. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 24, 708–728.

Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2003. Patent policy in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economics, 78, 239–258.

Iwaisako, T., and Futagami, K., 2013. Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory, 52, 631–668.

Jones, C., 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of political Economy, 103, 759–784.

Jones, C., and Kim, J., 2018. A Schumpeterian model of top income inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1785–1826.

Jones, C., and Williams, J., 1998. Measuring the social return to R&D. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1119–1135.

Judd, K., 1985. On the performance of patents. Econometrica, 53, 567–586.

Kiedaisch, C., 2015. Intellectual property rights in a quality-ladder model with persistent leadership. European Economic Review, 80, 194–213.

Kiedaisch, C., 2021. Growth and welfare effects of intellectual property rights when consumers differ in income. Economic Theory, 72, 1121–1170.

Krueger, D., and Perri, F., 2006. Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality? Evidence and theory. The Review of Economic Studies, 73, 163–193.

Kwan, Y., and Lai, E., 2003. Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27, 853–873.

Li, C.-W., 2001. On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal, 111, C164–C179.

Minniti, A., Parello, C., and Segerstrom, P., 2013. A Schumpeterian growth model with random quality improvements. Economic Theory, 52, 755–791.

O’Donoghue, T., and Zweimuller, J., 2004. Patents in a model of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 81–123.

Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283–311.

Piketty, T., 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.

Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.

Saez, E., and Zucman, G., 2016. Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 519–578.

Saito, Y., 2017. Effects of patent protection on economic growth and welfare in a two-R&D-sector economy. Economic Modelling, 62, 124–129.

Sampat, B., 2018. A Survey of Empirical Evidence on Patents and Innovation. NBER Working Paper 25383.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077–1091.

Silverberg, G., and Verspagen, B., 2007. The size distribution of innovations revisited: an application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance. Journal of Econometrics, 139, 318–339.

Spinesi, L., 2011. Probabilistic heterogeneous patent protection and innovation incentives. The B.E. Journal in Economic Analysis & Policy, 11, 45.

Yang, Y., 2018. On the optimality of IPR protection with blocking patents. Review of Economic Dynamics, 27, 205–230.

Yang, Y., 2021. Welfare effects of patent protection in a growth model with R&D and capital accumulation. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 25, 579–602.

Zheng, Z., 2020. Inflation and income inequality in a Schumpeterian economy with menu costs. Economics Letters, 186, 108524.

Zheng, Z., Mishra, T., and Yang, Y., 2020. Inflation and income inequality in a variety-expansion growth model with menu costs. Economics Letters, 194, 109373.

Zweimuller, J., 2000. Schumpeterian entrepreneurs meet Engel’s law: The impact of inequality on innovation-driven growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 5, 185–206.