Nogueira, Leticia and Wigger, Karin and Jolly, Suyash (2021): Common‐pool Resources and Governance in Sustainability Transitions. Published in: Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions , Vol. 41, No. Celebrating a decade of EIST: What’s next for transition studies? (December 2021): pp. 35-38.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111721.pdf Download (521kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Common-pool resources (CPRs) are critical in sustainability transitions. They are often important means for environmental and societal innovation, and object of unsustainable extraction and governance practices. We argue why CPRs and their governance matter in transitions and point to issues for further research: (i) conceptualization of sustainability and transitions in light of common-pool resources and governance; (ii) the roles, potentials, and challenges of commoning practices, beyond the market–state dichotomy; (iii) interactions between CPRs and commons with markets/firms and the state/governments in processes of sustainability transitions. These overarching issues bring fresh perspectives to transitions literature: (i) CPRs/commons help advance the integration between ecological and socio-technical systems (ii) non-excludable resources affect entrepreneurial activity and innovation processes in the dynamics of socio-technical system; (iii) CPRs/commons add new viewpoints to the question of directionality of transitions. We conclude by advocating for building bridges with new institutional and environmental economics, and social practice theory.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Common‐pool Resources and Governance in Sustainability Transitions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Common-pool resources, CPR, commons, collective action, polycentric governance, sustainability transitions |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction > L70 - General M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q59 - Other |
Item ID: | 111721 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Leticia Antunes Nogueira |
Date Deposited: | 05 Feb 2022 07:54 |
Last Modified: | 05 Feb 2022 07:54 |
References: | Agrawal, Arun. 2014. “Studying the Commons, Governing Common-Pool Resource Outcomes: Some Concluding Thoughts.” Environmental Science & Policy, Interrogating the Commons, 36 (February): 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.012. Ahlborg, Helene, Ilse Ruiz-Mercado, Sverker Molander, and Omar Masera. 2019. “Bringing Technology into Social-Ecological Systems Research—Motivations for a Socio-Technical-Ecological Systems Approach.” Sustainability 11 (April): 2009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072009. Andersen, Allan Dahl, and Olav Wicken. 2021. “Making Sense of How the Natural Environment Shapes Innovation, Industry Dynamics, and Sustainability Challenges.” Innovation and Development 11 (1): 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1770975. Anderson, Terry L. 2004. “Donning Coase-Coloured Glasses: A Property Rights View of Natural Resource Economics*.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 48 (3): 445–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00257.x. Andersson, Johnn, Hans Hellsmark, and Björn Sandén. 2021. “The Outcomes of Directionality: Towards a Morphology of Sociotechnical Systems.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 40 (September): 108–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.008. Ansari, Shahzad, Frank Wijen, and Barbara Gray. 2013. “Constructing a Climate Change Logic: An Institutional Perspective on the ‘Tragedy of the Commons.’” Organization Science 24 (4): 1014–40. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0799. Arora, Saurabh, Barbara Van Dyck, Divya Sharma, and Andy Stirling. 2020. “Control, Care, and Conviviality in the Politics of Technology for Sustainability.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16 (1): 247–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1816687. Bollier, David, and Silke Helfrich. 2012. The Wealth of the Commons: A World beyond Market & State. Levellers Press. http://wealthofthecommons.org/contents. Carson, Richard T. 2012. “Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative When Prices Aren’t Available.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (4): 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.27. Coase, R. H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, 1–44. Cohen, Boyd, and Monika I. Winn. 2007. “Market Imperfections, Opportunity and Sustainable Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing 22 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001. Farley, Joshua, Robert Costanza, Gary Flomenhoft, and Daniel Kirk. 2015. “The Vermont Common Assets Trust: An Institution for Sustainable, Just and Efficient Resource Allocation.” Ecological Economics 109 (January): 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.016. Feola, Giuseppe. 2020. “Capitalism in Sustainability Transitions Research: Time for a Critical Turn?” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35 (June): 241–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.02.005. Gamache, Guillaume, Juliette Anglade, Romain Feche, Fabienne Barataud, Catherine Mignolet, and Xavier Coquil. 2020. “Can Living Labs Offer a Pathway to Support Local Agri-Food Sustainability Transitions?” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37 (December): 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.002. Geels, Frank W., Andy McMeekin, Josephine Mylan, and Dale Southerton. 2015. “A Critical Appraisal of Sustainable Consumption and Production Research: The Reformist, Revolutionary and Reconfiguration Positions.” Global Environmental Change 34 (September): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.013. Goldthau, Andreas. 2014. “Rethinking the Governance of Energy Infrastructure: Scale, Decentralization and Polycentrism.” Energy Research & Social Science 1 (March): 134–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.009. Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (3859): 1243–48. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243. Karakaya, Emrah, and Cali Nuur. 2018. “Social Sciences and the Mining Sector: Some Insights into Recent Research Trends.” Resources Policy, Special Issue on Mining Value Chains, Innovation and Learning, 58 (October): 257–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.05.014. Kostakis, Vasilis, Andreas Roos, and Michel Bauwens. 2016. “Towards a Political Ecology of the Digital Economy: Socio-Environmental Implications of Two Competing Value Models.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18 (March): 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.08.002. Ménard, Claude. 2011. “A New Institutional Economics Perspective on Environmental Issues.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 115–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.002. Nayak, Bibhu P., Christine Werthmann, and Veena Aggarwal. 2015. “Trust and Cooperation among Urban Poor for Transition to Cleaner and Modern Cooking Fuel.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 14 (March): 116–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.09.002. Nunes, Paulo A. L. D, and Jeroen C. J. M van den Bergh. 2001. “Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: Sense or Nonsense?” Ecological Economics 39 (2): 203–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00233-6. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Ostrom, Elinor. 2002. “Common-Pool Resources and Institutions: Toward a Revised Theory.” In Handbook of Agricultural Economics, 2:1315–39. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0072(02)10006-5. Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” The American Economic Review 100 (3): 33. Pansera, Mario, and Mariano Fressoli. 2019. “Innovation Without Growth: Technological Change in a Post-Growth Era.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3486805. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486805. Rivera, Javier de, Ángel Gordo, Paul Cassidy, and Amaya Apesteguía. 2017. “A Netnographic Study of P2P Collaborative Consumption Platforms’ User Interface and Design.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23 (June): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.003. Robinson, Douglas K. R., and Mariana Mazzucato. 2019. “The Evolution of Mission-Oriented Policies: Exploring Changing Market Creating Policies in the US and European Space Sector.” Research Policy, New Frontiers in Science, Technology and Innovation Research from SPRU’s 50th Anniversary Conference, 48 (4): 936–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005. Rodela, Romina, Catherine May Tucker, Mateja Šmid-Hribar, Maurizia Sigura, Nevenka Bogataj, Mimi Urbanc, and Alexey Gunya. 2019. “Intersections of Ecosystem Services and Common-Pool Resources Literature: An Interdisciplinary Encounter.” Environmental Science & Policy 94 (April): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.021. Smith, Adrian, and Andy Stirling. 2010. “The Politics of Social-Ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions.” Ecology and Society 15 (1): 11. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03218-150111. Steffen, Will, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah E. Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, et al. 2015. “Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet.” Science 347 (6223): 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855. Vermunt, D. A., S. O. Negro, F. S. J. Van Laerhoven, P. A. Verweij, and M. P. Hekkert. 2020. “Sustainability Transitions in the Agri-Food Sector: How Ecology Affects Transition Dynamics.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36 (September): 236–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.06.003. Vivero-Pol, Jose Luis. 2017. “Transition towards a Food Commons Regime: Re-Commoning Food to Crowdfeed the World.” In Perspectives on Commoning: Autonomist Principles and Practices, edited by Guido Ruivenkamp and Andy Hilton. London: Zed Books Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350221741. Wigger, Karin Andrea, and Thomas Lauvås. forthcoming. “Collective Resources in Entrepreneurship: A Reconceptualization of Resource Mobilization.” In Beyond Context: Highlighting the Social in Innovation and Entrepreneurship., edited by Beniamino Callegari, Bisrat Agegnehu Misganaw, Erik Andreas Sæther, and Stefania Sardo. Edward Elgar Publishing. Wigger, Karin Andrea, and Dean A. Shepherd. 2020. “We’re All in the Same Boat: A Collective Model of Preserving and Accessing Nature-Based Opportunities.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 44 (3): 587–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719834014. Wigger, K.A., Lauvås, T., forthcoming. Collective Resources in Entrepreneurship: A Reconceptualization of Resource Mobilization, in: Callegari, B., Misganaw, B.A., Sæther, E.A., Sardo, S. (Eds.), Beyond Context: Highlighting the Social in Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing. Vivero-Pol, J.L., 2017. Transition towards a food commons regime: re-commoning food to crowdfeed the world., in: Ruivenkamp, G., Hilton, A. (Eds.), Perspectives on Commoning: Autonomist Principles and Practices. Zed Books Ltd, London. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350221741 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111721 |