Cozzi, Guido (2022): Shall we fear a Patent Waiver? Not for Covid-19 Vaccines.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111990.pdf Download (107kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Shall vaccine patents be temporarily suspended? In a simple model, I reflect the essence of the debate on the Covid-19 patent waiver. The central message is that if the probability of imitating innovative vaccines is low, then a patent waiver would be harmless to future R&D. Conversely, a patent waiver would be undesirable if it is too easy to imitate future innovations. This paper also derives a simple policy rule for R&D subsidies that governments can use to correct the adverse effects of the waiver on the incentives to innovate. The vaccine industry is highly concentrated. While the social gains from successful imitation are huge, it is hard to transfer vaccine know-how from the handful of patent holders to potential imitators. In this environment, loosening intellectual property rights (IPRs) protection in a pandemic has significant macroeconomic advantages. Still, it may harm future innovation because it would create an expectation of future IPRs waivers. This paper allows an upbeat assessment of the conditions that make a patent waiver desirable, even considering the future R&D implications. Moreover, it shows how reasonably minimal rises of R&D subsidies can overcome the IPRs uncertainty.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Shall we fear a Patent Waiver? Not for Covid-19 Vaccines |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Covid-19; Research and Development; Vaccines; Intellectual; Health Economics; Property Rights. |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I18 - Government Policy ; Regulation ; Public Health O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
Item ID: | 111990 |
Depositing User: | Prof Guido Cozzi |
Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2022 16:21 |
Last Modified: | 16 Feb 2022 16:21 |
References: | D. Acemoglu, J. Linn, (2004), Market size in innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (3) (2004), pp. 1049-1090. R. Agarwal and T. Reed (2021) "How to End the COVID-19 Pandemic by March 2022", World Bank Group, April, 2021, Policy Research Working Paper 9632. Castillo, J C, A Ahuja, S Athey, A Baker, E Budish, T Chipty, Glennerster, R., Kominers, S. D., Kremer, M., Larso, G., Jean Lee, J., Prendergast, C. Snyder, M., Tabarrok, A., Brandon J.,W.Więcek (2021), "Market Design to Accelerate COVID-19 Vaccine Supply", Science, vol. 371(6534). V. Denicolo', (2001), "Two-Stage Patent Races and Patent Policy", The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Autumn, 2000), pp. 488-501. Deleidi, M. and Mazzucato, M. (2021), "Directed innovation policies and the supermultiplier: An empirical assessment of mission-oriented policies in the US economy." Research Policy, 50(2). A. Finkelstein, (2004), Static and dynamic effect of health policy: evidence from the vaccine industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (2) (2004), pp. 527-564. Forslid, R. and M. Herzing, (2015), "On the optimal production capacity for influenza vaccine", Health Economics, ;24(6), pp. 726-41. Forslid, R. and M. Herzing, (2021), "Who to vaccinate first: Some important trade-offs", Covid Economics 79, 2021, pp. 93-116. Geoffard, P-Y and T Philipson (1996), "Rational Epidemics and their Public Control", International Economic Review 37(3): 603--624. Gersbach, H., Schneider, M. T., and Schneller, O. (2013). Basic research, openness, and convergence. Journal of Economic Growth, 18(1):33-68. Gersbach, H. and Schneider, M. T. (2015). On the global supply of basic research. Journal of Monetary Economics, 75:123-137. Gersbach, H., Schetter, U., and Schneider, M. T. (2019). Taxation, innovation, and entrepreneurship. The Economic Journal, 129(620):1731-1781. Grabowski, H. , (2005), Encouraging the development of new vaccines, Health Affairs, 24 (3) (2005), pp. 697-700. Jones, C. and J. Williams, 1998, "Measuring the Social Return to R&D", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1119-1135. Kis, Z and Z Rizvi (2021), How to Make Enough Vaccine for the World in One Year, Public Citizen Report, 26 May. Kremer, M (1998), "Patent buyouts: a mechanism for encouraging innovation", Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4): 1137--1167. M. Kremer, (2001a), Creating markets for new vaccines. Part I. Rationale, A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1, MIT Press (2001). M. Kremer, (2001b), Creating markets for new vaccines. Part I. Design Issues, B.J. Adam, L. Josh, S. Scott (Eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, 1, MIT Press (2001). Kremer, Michael, and Rachel Glennerster, (2004), "Strong Medicine: Creating Incentives for Pharmaceutical Research on Neglected Diseases." Princeton, Princeton University Press. M. Kremer, J. Levin, and C.M. Snyder, (2020), "Advance Market Commitments: Insights from Theory and Experience", AEA Papers and Proceedings, vol 110, pp. 269-73. Laplane, A. and Mazzucato, M. (2020), "Socializing the risks and rewards of public investments: Economic, policy, and legal issues." Forthcoming Research Policy. MacDonnel, A. and F. Toxvaerd (2021), "How does the market for vaccines work?", Economics Observatory, May. Mazzuccato, M., (2013), The Entrepreneurial State, Penguin books, London. Mazzucato, M., and Li, H. L. (2021). "A Market Shaping Approach for the Biopharmaceutical Industry: Governing Innovation Towards the Public Interest". Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 49(1), 39--49. Oxfam (2021), "Vaccine monopolies make cost of vaccinating the world against COVID at least 5 times more expensive than it could be", press release, 29 July. Scotchmer, S. (2004), "Innovation and Incentives", MIT Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111990 |