Guo, Baoping (2015): Heckscher-Ohlin Theories from Factor Price Equalization to Factor Price Localization vs Empirical Observations from the Leontief Paradox to the Leontief Trade.

Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112433.pdf Download (791kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper extends the integrated world equilibrium into effective endowment analyses to obtain the price-trade equilibrium with factor price non-equalization. Trefler (1993)’s effective endowments explored an important logic that a country will export its commodity that is produced by using its effective abundant factor rather than its actual abundant factor intensively. This study shows that the logic favors both the Heckscher-Ohlin trade and the phenomena of the Leontief paradox (this study refers it to Leontief trade). When a country’s actual factor abundance is not consistent with its effective factor abundance, Leontief paradox occurs. The Leontief trade not only occurs under the presence of factor intensity reversals (FIR) but also occurs with the absence of the FIR. The localized factor prices make sure gains from trade for both countries, no matter it is the Heckscher-Ohlin trade, or it is the Leontief trades. The paper explores factor price definitions of trade patterns, which explain well the skill intensity reversals reported in empirical studies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Heckscher-Ohlin Theories from Factor Price Equalization to Factor Price Localization vs Empirical Observations from the Leontief Paradox to the Leontief Trade |
English Title: | Heckscher-Ohlin Theories from Factor Price Equalization to Factor Price Localization vs Empirical Observations from the Leontief Paradox to the Leontief Trade |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Localized factor prices, factor price equalization, factor price non-equalization, General equilibrium of trade, Leontief Paradox, Leontief trade |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics F - International Economics > F1 - Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration |
Item ID: | 112433 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Baoping Guo |
Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2022 08:16 |
Last Modified: | 21 Mar 2022 08:16 |
References: | Bertrand, J. T. (1972). An Extension of the N-. Factor Case of Factor Proportions Theory, Kyklos, July 1972, 25, 592-96. Baldwin, Robert E. (1971). "Determinants of the Commodity Structure of U.S. Trade". The American Economic Review. 61 (1): 126–146. JSTOR 1910546 Chipman, J. S. (1969). Factor price equalization and the Stolper–Samuelson theorem. International Economic Review, 10(3), 399−406 Davis, D, R. (1995) Intra-Industry Trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach, Journal of Economics, 39 (1995) 201-226. Davis, D. R. & D. E. Weinstein, (2001, December). An account of global factor trade, American Economic Review, 91(5), 1423−1453. Deardorff, A.V. (1982), “General Validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 72, No. 4 (Sep. 1982), 683-694. Deardorff, A.V. (1986) “ FIRLESS FIRWOES: How Preferences can Interfere with the Theorems of International Trade, " Journal of International Economics, 20, 131-142. Deardorff, A.V. (1994), The possibility of factor price equalization revisited, Journal of International Economics, XXXVI, 167-75. Dixit, A.K. and Norman V. (1980), Theory of International Trade, James Nisbet, Welwyn, and Cambridge University Press. Heller, P. S. (1976) Factor Endowment Changes and Comparative Advantage: The Case of Japan 1956-1969, Review of Economics and Statistics, August 1976, 58(1), 283-292. Helpman, E. (1984), “The Factor Content of Foreign Trade”, Economic Journal, XCIV, 84-94. Helpman, E. and Krugman P.R. (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, MIT Press. Feenstra, C. Robert (2004) Advanced International Trade Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press. Feenstra, C. R. and A.M. Taylor (2012), “International Economics”, Worth, 2nd edition, 2012. Fisher, E. O’N. and K. G. Marshall (2008), “Factor content of trade when countries have different technology, http://www.calpoly.edu.efisher/FCT.pdf. Fisher, E. O’N. (2011), “Heckscher-Ohlin Theory When Countries Have Different Technologies.” International Review of Economics and Finance 20, 202-210. Fisher, E. O’N. and K. G. Marshall (2011), “The Structure of the American Economy.” Review of International Economics 19 (February 2011), 15-31. Guo, B. (2005), “Endogenous Factor-Commodity Price Structure by Factor Endowments”, International Advances in Economic Research, November 2005, Volume 11, Issue 4, p 484 Guo, B. (2015) General Trade Equilibrium of Integrated World Economy, MPRA Paper No. 107732, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/107732/. Guo, B. (2019) Trade Effects Based on Trade Equilibrium, Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(1(618), S), pages 159-168. Guo, B. (2018) World Factor Price Equalization and World Trade Space, MPRA Paper No. 107994, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/107994/1/MPRA_paper_107994.pdf Fisher, E.E’O (2011), Heckscher-Ohlin Theory When Countries Have Different Technologies, International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 20, Issue 2, April 1, 2011, pages 202-210. Jones, R. W. (1956), “Factor Proportions and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 24, No. 1 (1956 - 1957), pp. 1-10 Jones, R. W. (1965), The Structure of Simple General Equilibrium Models, Journal of Political Economy 73, 557-572. Keesing D. B., Labor Skill and Comparative Advantagees’, American Economic Review, February 1967, 75,38-49. Kozo, K. and K. Yoshinori (2017), “Factor Intensity Reversals Redux”, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 17-E-021, available at https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/17e021.pdf Krugman, P. R. (2000), “Technology, Trade, and Factor Prices”, Journal of International Economics 50 (2000) 51 –71 Kurokawa, Y. (2011), “Is a Skill Intensity Reversal a Mere Theoretical Curiosum? Evidence from the U.S. and Mexico, Economics Letters”, Vol 112, Issue 2, pp 151-154. Kwok, YK. and E. S. H. Yu (2005), Leontief Paradox and Role of Factor Intensity Measurement, available at https://www.iioa.org/conferences/15th/pdf/kwok_yu.pdf Lerner, A. (1952), Factor Price and International Trade, Economica, n.s.19, 1-15, Leamer, E. (1980), “The Leontief Paradox, Reconsideration”, Journal of Political Economics, 88(3), 495-503 Leamer, E. (1984) Source Of International Comparative Advantage, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England. Leamer, E.E. and Levinsohn, J. (1995), International trade theory: evidence, in Gene M Grossman and Kenneth S. Rogoff(eds), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III. New York: Elsevier Science. Leontief, W. (1953). "Domestic Production and Foreign Trade; The American Capital Position Re-Examined". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 97 (4): 332–349. JSTOR 3149288. McKenzie, L. (1955), Equality of factor prices in world trade, Econometrica, 23, 239-257. McKenzie, L. (1987), General Equilibrium, The New Palgrave, A dictionary of economics, 1987, v. 2, pp 498-512. Minhas, B. S. (1962), The Homohypallagic Production Function, Factor-Intensity Reversals, and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem, Journal of Political Economy, 70(2):138-56. Reshef, A. (2007), “Heckscher-Ohlin and the Global Increase of Skill Premia: Factor Intensity Reversals to the Rescue”. Working Paper, New York University. Rassekh, F. and Thompson, H. (1993) Factor Price Equalization: Theory and Evidence.' Journal of Economic Integration 8, Spring:1–32. Roskamp, K. W. Factor Proportion and Foreign Trade: The case of West Germany, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 1963, 319-326. Sampson, T. (2016), Assignment Reversals: Trade, Skill Allocation and Wage Inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 163: 365-409. Samuelson, P. (1938), Welfare Economics and International Trade. American Economic Review, 28, 261-66. Reprinted in ed. JE Stiglitz (1966), 775-780. Samuelson, P. (1948), International trade and the equalization of factor prices. Economic Journal, 58, 163–84. Samuelson, P. (1949), International factor-price equalization once again. Economic Journal, 59, 181–97. Reprinted in ed. JE Stiglitz (1966), 869-885. Samuelson, P. (1953), Prices of factors and goods in general equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 21, 1–20. Samuelson, P. (1971) Ohlin was right. Swedish Journal of Economics, 73, 365–84. Samuelson, P. (1992), Factor-price equalization by trade in joint and non-joint production. Review of International Economics, v. 1, 1-9. Takahashi, H. (2004), “The capital-intensity reversal in the postwar Japanese economy: Why did Japan grow so fast during 1955-1975?”, Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29876/ Trefler, D. (1993). International Factor Price Differences: Leontief Was Right! Journal of Political Economy 101 (1993), 961-87 Vanek, J. (1968), The Factor Proportions Theory: the N-Factor Case, Kyklos, 21(23), 749-756. Woodland, A. (2013), General Equilibrium Trade Theory, Chapter 3, in Bernhofen, D., Falvey, R., Greenaway, D. and Kreickemeier U. (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of International Trade, Palgrave Macmillan. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112433 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Leontief Paradox Explored A New Trade Pattern When Countries Have Different Technologies. (deposited 11 Nov 2019 11:25)
-
Heckscher-Ohlin Theories from Factor Price Equalization to Factor Price Localization vs Empirical Observations from the Leontief Paradox to the Leontief Trade. (deposited 07 Jun 2021 10:21)
- Heckscher-Ohlin Theories from Factor Price Equalization to Factor Price Localization vs Empirical Observations from the Leontief Paradox to the Leontief Trade. (deposited 21 Mar 2022 08:16) [Currently Displayed]
-
Heckscher-Ohlin Theories from Factor Price Equalization to Factor Price Localization vs Empirical Observations from the Leontief Paradox to the Leontief Trade. (deposited 07 Jun 2021 10:21)