Ariff, Azwar and Masih, Mansur (2017): Role of global financial crisis in causing dynamic connectedness of Asian equity markets.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112555.pdf Download (617kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Dynamic connectedness of equity markets especially when shock happened has been a concern for policymakers and market participants. In this paper, we examine the connectedness of Asian equity markets within the region when the US subprime crisis or better-known as the global financial crisis occurred in 2008.This paper wants to know whether there has been a shift in terms of net shock givers and receivers over the time? Subsequently, how has connectedness in equity markets changed over time? Finally, do markets become more connected during crisis period? We employ daily data of US, Japan, South Korea, China, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand. We find that Singapore, US, Malaysia and South Korea played significant roles in bringing about dynamic connectedness of Asian equity markets. In terms of the global financial crisis, emerging market economies such as Singapore, Malaysia and South Korea seem to be vulnerable to the shock and may have contributed as spillover effect of shock to other Asian equity markets. Whereas economies such as China and Japan became a net receiver of shock.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Role of global financial crisis in causing dynamic connectedness of Asian equity markets |
English Title: | Role of global financial crisis in causing dynamic connectedness of Asian equity markets |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Dynamic connectedness, Global Financial Crisis, Asian equity markets |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G15 - International Financial Markets |
Item ID: | 112555 |
Depositing User: | Professor Mansur Masih |
Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2022 11:48 |
Last Modified: | 29 Mar 2022 11:48 |
References: | Bessler, D. A. and Yang, J. (2003),The structure of interdependence in international stock markets, Journal of Finance, 50, 403- 444 Climent, F. and Meneu, V. (2003), Has 1997 Asian crisis increased information flows between international markets, International Review of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 111-143. Corhay, A. Rad, A. and Urbain, J. (1995) Long run behaviour Pacific-Basin stock prices, Applied Financial Economics, 5, 11-18 Daly, K. (2003) South East Asian stock market linkages: evidence from pre and post-Oct 1997, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 20(1), 73 - 85 Engle, R. F., and Granger, C. W. (1987). Cointegration and error-correction representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. Francis, B. and Leachman, J. (1998) Super-exogeneity and the dynamic linkages among international equity markets, American Economic Review, 81, 222 - 226 Hung, B. W. S., and Cheung, Y. L. (1995). Interdependence of Asian emerging equity markets. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 22(2), 281-288. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580. Kearney, C. and Lucey, B.M. (2004), International equity market integration: theory, evidence and implications, International Review of Financial Analysis, 13, 571-583. Masih, A.M.M. and Masih, R. (1999), Are Asian stock market fluctuations due mainly to intra-regional contagion effects? Evidence based on Asian emerging stock markets, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 7(3-4), 251-282. Masih M., Al-Elg A. and Madani, H. (2009) Causality between financial development and economic growth: an application of vector error correction and variance decomposition methods to Saudi Arabia. Applied Economics, 41(13),1691–1699. Pesaran, M.H. and Y. Shin (2002). Long Run Structural Modeling. Econometric Reviews, 21(1), 49-87. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112555 |