Ndlovu, Thabang (2022): Market Structure, Efficiency and Performance: Empirical evidence from South Africa’s Healthcare Insurer Market.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115505.pdf Download (433kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study assessed the relationship between market structure, conduct and performance in the South African healthcare insurer market for the period 2011 to 2017 using data obtained from the Council of Medical Schemes. Three hypotheses were tested: the structure-conduct-performance (SCP) paradigm, the relative market power (RMP) paradigm and the efficient structure (ES) hypothesis. The empirical evidence reveals that both the SCP and ES hypotheses can be rejected in relation to South African medical schemes. The empirical evidence reveals support for differing hypotheses for open and restricted medical schemes. Moreover, the empirical results suggest that the market for restricted medical schemes is highly concentrated and operating under a reduced efficiency level which produces less than desirable outcomes. In regard to open medical schemes, the empirical results reveal strong support for the RMP hypothesis which suggests that open medical schemes with more differentiated product and/or service offerings will achieve higher market share, be in a position to exercise market power and thus able to set higher prices and earn higher profit.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Market Structure, Efficiency and Performance: Empirical evidence from South Africa’s Healthcare Insurer Market. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Healthcare Insurance, DEA, Competition, Market Structure, Market Conduct, Market Performance, South Africa |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L0 - General > L00 - General L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure |
Item ID: | 115505 |
Depositing User: | Dr Thabang Ndlovu |
Date Deposited: | 30 Nov 2022 14:51 |
Last Modified: | 30 Nov 2022 14:51 |
References: | ALHASSAN, A. L. and ADDISON, G. K. (2013). Market structure, efficiency, and performance: Empirical evidence from Ghanaian insurance market. 1st UGBS Conference on business and development in Africa, Accra, Ghana, 8-9 April. BAIN, J. (1968). Industrial Organization. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc. BAIN, J. (1951). The relation of profit rate to industry concentration, American manufacturing, 1936–1940. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65(3), 293-324. BERGER, A. N. and HANNAN, T. H. (1993). Using Efficiency Measures to Distinguish among Alternative Explanations of the Structure-performance Relationship in Banking. Working Paper. United States: Federal Reserve Board. BRESNAHAN, T. F. and REISS, P. (1991). Entry and competition in concentrated markets. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 977-1009. CARLTON, D. and PERLOFF, J. (2000). Modern Industrial Organization. 3rd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. CHARNES, A., COPPER, W. and RHODES, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operations Research, 2(6), 429-444. CHOI, B. P. and WEISS, M. A. (2005). An empirical investigation of market structure, efficiency, and performance in property-liability insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72(4), 635-673. CHURCH, J. and WARE, R. (2000). Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill. DEMSETZ, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 1-9. DRANOVE, D., GRON, A. and MAZZEO, M. J. (2003). Differentiation and competition in HMO Markets. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 51(4), 433-454. EDWARDS, S., ALLEN, A. and SHAIK, S. (2006). Market Structure Conduct Performance (SCP) hypothesis revisted using stochastic frontier efficiency analysis. AAEA Annual Meeting, Long Beach, CA, 23-26 July. EVANOFF, D. and FORTIER, D. L. (1988). Re-evaluation of the structure-conduct-performance paradigm in banking. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1(3), 277-294. FARRELL, M. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A(General), 120(3), 253-290. FERGUSON, P. R. and FERGUSON, G. J. (1994). Industrial Economics Issues and Perspectives. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. HAUSMAN, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271. HICKS, J. (1935). Annual survey of economic theory: The theory of monopoly. Econometrica, 3(1), 1-20. LELISSA, T. B. (2018). The structure conduct performance model and competing hypothesis – A review of literature. Reasearch Journal of Finance and Accounting, 9(1), 76-89. LEVERTY, T., LIN, Y. and ZHOU, H. (2004). Firm performance in the Chinese insurance industry. [Online] Available: http://rmictr.gsu.edu/Papers/WP04_10.pdf. MASON, E. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. American Economic Review, 29(1), 61-74. MAUDAS, J. and FERNÁNDEZ-de-GUEVARA, J. (2007). The cost of market power in banking: Social welfare loss vs cost inefficiency. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(7), 2103-2125. MAZZEO, M. (2002). Product choice and oligopoly market structure. Rand Journal of Economics, 33(2), 221-242. MOLYNEUX, P. and FORBES, W. (1995). Market structure and performance in European banking. Applied Economics, 27(2), 155-159. MOORE, R. (1998). Concentration, technology and market power in banking: Is distance dead? Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Financial Industry Studies, December, 1-10. [Online] Available: https://www.dallasfed.org/~/media/documents/banking/fis/fis9802.pdf NARVER, J. and SAVITT, R. (1971). The Marketing Economy: An Analytical Approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. NEUBERGER, D. (1997). Structure, Conduct and Performance in Banking Markets. Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory, 12. Germany: University of Rostock, Institute of Economics. PURCELL, W. D. (1973). An approach to research on vertical integration: The beef system in Oklahoma. American Journal of Agriculture, 55(1), 65-68. QICHANG, Y., ZONGLING, X. and FANG, D. (2012). Market structure, performance, efficiency of the Chinese banking sector. Economic Change and Restructuring, 45(4), 337-358. SATHYE, M. (2005). Market strucuture and performance in Australian banking. Review of Accounting and Finance, 4(2), 107-122. SHEPHERD, W. G. (1986a). Tobin's q and the structure-performance relationship: Comment. The American Economic Review, 76(5), 1205-1219. SHEPHERD, W. G. (1986b). On the core concepts of industrial economics. In Mainstreams in Industrial Organization (pp. 23-67). Boston: Kluwer Academic. SMIRLOCK, M. (1985). Evidence on the (non) relationship between concentration and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(1), 69-83. SMIT, H. and TRIGEORGIS, L. (2004). Strategic Investment: Real options and games. New Jersey:Princeton University Press. TUCKER, B. (2010). Survey of Economics. s.l.:Cengage South-Western. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115505 |