On Labor Productivity Growth and the Wage Share with Endogenous Size and Direction of Technical Change

Zamparelli, Luca (2022): On Labor Productivity Growth and the Wage Share with Endogenous Size and Direction of Technical Change.

Abstract

This paper combines induced innovation and endogenous growth to investigate both the relation between the wage share and labor productivity growth and the long-run determinants of the wage share. We assume that myopic competitive firms choose the size and direction of technical change to maximize the growth rate of profits. We first prove that the optimal choice of labor productivity growth may be either a positive or a negative function of the wage share, depending on specific restrictions on the innovation technology. Next, by embedding the microeconomic problem into a Classical growth model, we show that a rise in the saving rate may reduce the steady state wage share. Both results conflict with the standard findings of the induced innovation literature, where labor productivity growth is always a positive function of the wage share and where the steady state labor share is independent of the saving rate.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Labor productivity growth, Induced innovation, wage share
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992), A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometrica, 60(2): 323-351.

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P. (2010), The Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Allen, Robert C. (2009), The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Bester, H. and E. Petrakis (2003), Wages and Productivity Growth in a Competitive Industry. Journal of Economic Theory 109 (1): 52-69.

Dieppe, A. ed. (2021), Global Productivity: Trends, Drivers, and Policies. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Drandakis, E. M., and Phelps, E. S. (1965), A model of induced invention, growth and distribution. Economic Journal 76 (304): 823–40.

Foley, D. K. (2003), Endogenous technical change with externalities in a classical growth model. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52 (2): 167-189.

Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Habakkuk, H. J. (1962), American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Hicks, J.R. (1932[1960]), The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan.

ILO (2018), Statement by Guy Ryder, ILO Director-General, to the International Monetary and Financial Committee, https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/statements-and-speeches/WCMS_626195/lang--en/index.htm.

Julius, A. J. (2005), Steady state growth and distribution with an endogenous direction of technical change. Metroeconomica 56 (1): 101-125.

Kennedy, C. (1964), Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution. Economic Journal 74 (295): 541-547.

Kiefer, D., Mendieta-Munoz, I., Rada, C. and Von Arnim, R. (2020), Secular stagnation and income distribution dynamics. Review of Radical Political Economics 52(2): 189-207.

Nordhaus, W. D. (1967), The Optimal Rate and Direction of Technical Change, in Shell, K., ed. Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nordhaus, W. D. (1973), Some Skeptical Thoughts on the Theory of Induced Innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (2): 208-219.

Petach, L. and Tavani, D. (2020), Income shares, secular stagnation and the long-run distribution of wealth. Metroeconomica 71 (1): 235-55.

Segerstrom, P. S., Anant, T. and Dinopoulos, E. (1990), A Schumpeterian Model of the Product Life Cycle. American Economic Review, 80: 1077-1092.

Shah, A., and Desai, M. (1981), Growth cycles with induced technical change. The Economic Journal 91 (364): 1006-1010.

Storm, S. (2017), The New Normal: Demand, Secular Stagnation, and the Vanishing Middle Class. International Journal of Political Economy 46(4): 169-210.

Summers, L. (2014), U.S. Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound. Business Economics, 49(2): 65-73.

Tavani, D. and Zamparelli, L. (2020), Growth, income distribution, and the ‘entrepreneurial state’. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 30 (1): 117-141.

van der Ploeg, F. (1987), Growth Cycles, Induced Techincal Change, and Perpetual Conflict over the Distribution of Income. Journal of Macroeconomics 9 (1): 1-12.

von Weizsäcker, C.C. (1962[2019]), A New Technical Progress Function. German Economic Review 11 (3): 248-265.

von Weizsäcker , C.C. (1966), Tentative notes on a two sector model with induced technical progress. Review of Economic Studies 33 (3): 245–51.