What determines the Direction of Technological Progress(2023.11.16)?

Li, Defu and Bental, Benjamin (2023): What determines the Direction of Technological Progress(2023.11.16)?

Abstract

Technological progress relates not only to its rate but also to its direction and bias. The rate has been analyzed by the endogenous technical change models and the bias has been analyzed by the directed technical change model, but the determinants of the direction has not been uncovered yet. This paper tries to provide a framework where the equilibrium direction of technical change can be studied to reveal its determinants in steady state. The crucial introductions of the framework are the generalized factor accumulation processes and a generalized production function. The generalizations admit unrestricted factor supply elasticities and marginal transformation rates of production factors into effective factors. These turn out to be the key determinants of the steady-state direction of technological progress, whereby that direction tends towards the factor with the relatively smaller supply elasticity or marginal transformation rate. The neoclassical growth model as a special case cannot admit capital-augmenting technical change in steady state because of the assumptions of capital with infinite supply elasticity and constant marginal transformation rate. Similarly, labor-augmenting technical change cannot be part of a Malthusian steady state owing to labor with infinite supply elasticity. These results provide new insights for understanding the puzzle of Uzawa’s (1961) steady-state theorem and indicates that the size and change of factor supply elasticities may be crucial elements in explaining the Malthusian trap before the industrial revolution, the Kaldor (1961) facts afterwards and the industrial revolution itself.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Economic Growth, Direction of Technological Progress, Factor Supply Elasticities, Marginal transformation rates of Factors to Effective Factors, Uzawa Steady-State Theorem, Industrial Revolution, Adjustment Cost
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E13 - Neoclassical; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

References

Acemoglu, Daron, 2001, “Factor Prices and Technical Change: From Induced Innovations to Recent Debates”, SSRN Electronic Journal.

Acemoglu, Daron, 2002, “Directed Technical Change”, Review of Economic Studies 69, pp. 781–809.

Acemoglu, Daron, 2003, “Labor- and Capital-Augmenting Technical Change”, Journal of European Economic Association, Vol.1 (1), pp. 1-37.

Acemoglu, Daron, 2007, “Equilibrium Bias of Technology”, Econometrica 75(5): 1371–1410.

Acemoglu, Daron, 2009, Introduction to Modern Economic Growth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt, 1992, “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”, Econometrica, 60, pp. 323–351.

Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt,1998, Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Ashraf, Quamrul, and Oded Galor. 2011, “Dynamics and Stagnation in the Malthusian Epoch”, American Economic Review. Vol. 101, No. 5, pp. 2003-2041.

Barro, Robert J. and Xavier Sala-i-Martin, 2004, Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Bental, Benjamin, Defu Li and Xuemei Tang, 2022, “Comment on ‘Labor- and Capital-augmenting technical change’: Does the stability of balanced growth path depend on the elasticity of factor substitution? Working paper.

Bloom, Nicholas, Charles I. Jones, John Van Reenen, and Michael Webb. 2020. “Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?” American Economic Review,110 (4): 1104-44.

Borjas, George J., Kirk B. Doran, “The Collapse of the Soviet Union and the Productivity of American Mathematicians”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 127, Issue 3, August 2012, Pages 1143-1203, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs015.

Brozen, Yale, 1953, “Determinants of the direction of technological change”. American Economic Review, 43(2), 288-302.

Casey, Gregory and Ryo Horii, 2022, “A Generalized Uzawa Growth Theorem and Capital-Augmenting Technological Change,” ISER Discussion Paper 1157, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.

Cass, David, 1965, “Optimum Growth in an Aggregate Model of Capital Accumulation.” Review of Economic Studies 32: 233–240.

Chirinko, Robert S., and Debdulal Mallick. 2014, “The Substitution Elasticity, Factor Shares, Long-Run Growth, and the Low-Frequency Panel Model.” CESifo Working Paper 4895.

Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., and Evans, C. 2005, “Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy.” Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 1-45.

Drandakis, E. M., and Edmund S. Phelps, 1966, “A Model of Induced Invention, Growth, and Distribution”, Economic Journal, Vol. 76 (304), pp. 823-840.

Eisner, Robert, and Strotz, Robert H. 1963, “Determinants of Business Fixed Investment.” In Commission on Money and Credit, Impacts of Monetary Policy, 59–337. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Foley, Duncan K., and Sidrauski, Miguel. 1970, “Portfolio Choice, Investment and Growth.” American Economic Review 60 (March): 44–63.

Lucas, Robert E., Jr. 1967, “Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply.” Journal of Political Economy 75 (August): 321–334.

Feenstra, Robert C., Robert Inklaar and Marcel P. Timmer, 2015, “The Next Generation of the Penn World Table”, American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182, available for download at www.ggdc.net/pwt

Funk, Peter, 2002, “Induced Innovation Revisited”, Economica, 69, pp.155–171.

Galor, Oded, 2011, Unified Growth Theory, Princeton & Oxford, Princeton University Press.

Gordon, Robert J. 1990, The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices. Chicago: University of Chicago, Press.

Greenwood, Jeremy, Zvi Hercowitz, and Per Krusell. 1997, “Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change.” American Economic Review 87 (3): 342–62.

Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Grossman, Gene M., Elhanan Helpman, Ezra Oberfield, and Thomas Sampson. 2017, “Balanced Growth despite Uzawa”, American Economic Review, vol. 107(4), pp. 1293-1312.

Hicks, John, 1932, The Theory of Wages, London: Macmillan.

Irmen, Andreas, 2013, “Adjustment Costs in a Variant of Uzawa's Steady-state Growth Theorem”, Economics Bulletin, Vol. 33 No.4, pp. 2860-2873.

Irmen, Andreas, 2017, “Capital- and Labor-Saving Technical Change in an Aging Economy,” International Economic Review, Vol. 58(01), February 2017, pp. 261-285.

Irmen, Andreas, 2018, “A Generalized Steady-state Growth Theorem”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, vol. 22(04), pp. 779-804.

Irmen, Andreas and Amer Tabakovic, 2017, “Endogenous Capital- and Labor-Augmenting Technical Change in the Neoclassical Growth Model”, Journal of Economic Theory 170, pp. 346–384.

Jones, Charles I., 2005, “The Shape of Production Functions and the Direction of Technical Change”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 2, pp. 517–549.

Jones, Charles I., 2016, “The Facts of Economic Growth”, In Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 2, edited by John B. Taylor and Harald Uhlig, 3–69. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Jones, Charles I., and Paul M. Romer. 2010, “The New Kaldor Facts: Ideas, Institutions, Population, and Human Capital.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2 (1): 224–45.

Jones, Charles I., and Dean Scrimgeour, 2008, “A New Proof of Uzawa’s Steady-State Growth Theorem”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 90(1), pp. 180-182.

Kaldor, N., 1961, “Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth”, in The Theory of Capital, ed. by F. A.Lutz, and D. C. Hague, pp. 177–222. Macmillan & Co. LTD., New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Karabarbounis, Loukas, and Brent Neiman. 2014, “The Global Decline of the Labor Share.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (1): 61–103.

Kennedy, Charles M., 1964, “Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution”, Economic Journal, Vol. 74 (295), pp. 541-547.

Knoblach, Michael, Roessler, Martin and Zwerschke, Patrick, 2020, “The Elasticity of Substitution between Capital and Labour in the US Economy: A Meta-Regression Analysis”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 82(1), pp. 62-82.

Koopmans, Tjalling C., 1965, “On the Concept of Optimal Economic Growth.” In The Econometric Approach to Development Planning, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 225–295.

Lawrence, Robert Z., 2015, “Recent Declines in Labor’s Share in US Income: A Preliminary Neoclassical Account.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 21296.

León-Ledesma, M. A., and Satchi, M., 2018, “Appropriate technology and balanced growth”. Review of Economic Studies 0, 1–29.

Leviathan, Nisan and Samuelson, Paul, A.,1969, “Notes on turnpikes: Stable and unstable”, 1969, Journal of Economic Theory, December 1969,1(4), pp. 454-75.

Li, Defu, 2016,“A Proof of the Invalidity of Proposition 15.12 in Acemoglu(2009)”, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75329/.

Maddison, Angus,2003, The World Economy: Historical Statistics. CD-ROM. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Nordhaus, W., 1973, “Some Skeptical Thoughts on the Theory of Induced Innovation”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXXXVII, pp.208-219.

Oberfield, Ezra, and Devesh Raval, 2014, “Micro Data and Macro Technology.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 20452.

Rivera-Batiz, L. A. and P. M. Romer, 1991, “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp.531-555.

Romer, P. M., 1990, “Endogenous Technological Change”, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5) (October), Part II, S71-S102.

Samuelson, Paul A., 1965, “A Theory of Induced Innovation along Kennedy-Weizsäcker Lines”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 47(4), pp. 343-356.

Sato, R.,1996, “A Note on Modelling Endogenous Growth”, Keio Economic Studies, Vol. 33, pp. 93-101.

Sato, R., R. V. Ramachandran and C. Lian, 1999, “A Model of Optimal Economic Growth with Endogenous Bias”, Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 3, pp. 293-310.

Sato, R. and R. V. Ramachandran, 2000, “Optimal Growth with Endogenous Technical Progress: Hicksian Bias in a Macro Model”, The Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp.193-206.

Schlicht, Ekkehart, 2006, “A Variant of Uzawa’s Theorem,” Economics Bulletin 5:6, pp.1–5.

Solow, Robert M., 1956, “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.

Solow, Robert M., 1970, “Foreword,” in: Edwin Burmeister and Rodney A. Dobell, Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth, vii-ix, Collier-Macmillian, London.

Swan, Trevor W., 1956, “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation.” Economic Record, 32, November,334–361.

Uzawa, H., 1961, “Neutral Inventions and the Stability of Growth Equilibrium”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 28, February, pp. 117-124.

von Weizsäcker, C.C., 1962, A new technical progress function. Mimeo. MIT. Published in: Ger. Econ. Rev. 11 (2010), 248–265.