Neustadt, Ilja and Zweifel, Peter (2023): Redistribution in Whose Favor? Preferences with Regard to Types of Beneficiaries and Their Nationalities.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_119608.pdf Download (316kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to measure preferences for income redistribution through the public budget when recipients differ in terms of their 'degree of merit' (such as the working poor) and their nationalities. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed involving a representative sample of 979 Swiss citizens, permitting to test a number of competing hypotheses about the demand for redistribution. The income tax to be paid as a share of income serves as the price attribute to derive marginal willingness-to-pay (MWTP) values. They are found to differ significantly between recipients' nationalities even before the acceleration of immigration after 2009 (Swiss, citizens of Western European countries, citizens of other countries) and their types (old-age pensioners, people in ill health, the unemployed, working poor, and families with children). Swiss citizens exhibit positive MWTP in favor of themselves or Western European citizens to the detriment of citizens of other countries, who are perceived to be culturally distant.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Redistribution in Whose Favor? Preferences with Regard to Types of Beneficiaries and Their Nationalities |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Preferences for redistribution, willingness to pay, discrete choice experiments, social status, immigration debate, pocketbook voting, insurance motive. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C99 - Other D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H29 - Other H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General |
Item ID: | 119608 |
Depositing User: | Dr Ilja Neustadt |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jan 2024 15:46 |
Last Modified: | 04 Jan 2024 15:48 |
References: | Alesina, A. and Angeletos, G.-M. (2005). Fairness and Redistribution, The American Economic Review 95(4): 960–980. Alesina, A. F., Miano, A. and Stantcheva, S. (2023). Immigration and Redistribution, The Review of Economic Studies 90(1): 1–39. Alesina, A. F., Murard, E. and Rapoport, H. (2021). Immigration and Preferences for Redistribution in Europe, Journal of Economic Geography 21(6): 925–954. Alesina, A. and Giuliano, P. (2010). Preferences for Redistribution, in: Handbook of Social Economics, by J. Benhabib, M. Jackson and A. Bisin (eds.), vol. 1A, North Holland: 93–131. Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for Redistribution in the Land of Opportunities, Journal of Public Economics 89: 897–931. Assandri, M., Maffioletti, A., Piacenza, M. and Turati, G. (2018). Risk attitudes and preferences for redistribution: New evidence from the lab, CESifo Economic Studies 64: 489–515. Auer, D., Bonoli, G. and Fossati, F. (2017). Why Do Immigrants Have Longer Periods of Unemployment? Swiss Evidence, International Migration 55(1): 157–174. Beck, J. H. (1994). An Experimental Test of Preferences for the Distribution of Income and Individual Risk Aversion, Eastern Economic Journal 20(2): 131–145. Becker, K. and Zweifel, P. (2008). Age and choice in health insurance, The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1(1): 27–40. Ben-Akiva, M. E. and Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis, MIT Press. Benabou, R. and Ok, E. (2001). Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: the POUM Hypothesis, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 447–487. Benabou, R. and Tirole, J. (2006). Belief in a Just World and Redistributive Politics, Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2): 699–746. BFS (2005). Sterbetafeln für die Schweiz 1998/2003, BFS Report on Survival Tables in Switzerland, Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS), Neuchatel. BFS (2008). Familien in der Schweiz: Statistischer Bericht 2008, BFS Report on Families in Switzerland, Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS), Neuchatel. BFS (2010). Lebensbedingungen in der Schweiz 2009: Resultate der Erhebung über die Einkommen und die Lebensbedingungen (SILC), BFS Report on a Survey regarding Incomes and Livelihood in Switzerland, Swiss Federal Statistical Office (BFS), Neuchatel. Bjerk, D. (2016). In front of and behind the veil of ignorance: an analysis of motivations for redistribution, Social Choice and Welfare 47: 791–824. Boeri, T. (2010). Immigration to the Land of Redistribution, Economics 308(77): 651–687. Boeri, T., Boersch-Supan, A. and Tabellini, G. (2002). Pension Reforms and the Opinions of European Citizens, The American Economic Review 92(2): 396–401. Boeri, T., Boersch-Supan, A., Tabellini, G., Moene, K. O. and Lockwood, B. (2001). Would You Like to Shrink the Welfare State? A Survey of European Citizens, Economic Policy 16(32): 7–50. BSV (2018). Swiss social insurance system. Pocket statistics, Swiss Federal Social Insurance Office, Bern. BSV (2019). Overview of Swiss social security., Swiss Federal Social Insurance Office, Bern. Bütler, M. (2009). Switzerland: High Replacement Rates and Generous Subsistence as a Barrier to Work in Old Age, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice 34: 561–577. Carlsson, F. and Martinsson, P. (2003). Design Techniques for Stated Preference Methods in Health Economics, Health Economics 12: 281–294. Corneo, G. and Fong, C. (2008). What’s the Monetary Value of Distributive Justice?, Journal of Public Economics 92: 289–308. Durante, R., Putterman, L. and van der Weele, J. (2014). Preferences for Rredistribution and Perception of Fairness: an Experimental Study, Journal of the European Economic Assosiation 12(4): 1059–86. Elinder, M., Jordahl, H. and Poutvaara, P. (2015). Promises, policies and pocketbook voting, European Economic Review 75: 177–194. Fong, C. (2001). Social Preferences, Self-Interest, and the Demand for Redistribution, Journal of Public Economics 82: 225–246. Fong, C., Bowles, H. and Gintis, H. (2006). Strong Reciprocity and the Welfare State, in: Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, . Vol. 2, Ch. 23. Gärtner, M., Mollerstrom, J. and Seim, D. (2017). Individual risk preferences and the demand for redistribution, Journal of Public Economics 153: 49–55. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric Analysis, 4th edn, Prentice Hall. Gruber, J. and Hungerman, D. M. (2007). Faith-Based Charity and Crowd Out during the Great Depression, Journal of Public Economics 91(5–6): 1043–1069. Hensher, D. A., Louviere, J. J. and Swait, J. D. (1999). Combining Sources of Preference Data, Journal of Econometrics 89(1–2): 197–221. Hirschman, A. and Rothschild, M. (1973). The Changing Tolerance of Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(4): 544–566. Hole, A. R. (2007). A Comparison of Approaches to Estimating Confidence Intervals for Willingness to Pay Measures, Health Economics 16: 827–840. Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer Demand: A New Approach, Columbia University Press. Lalive, R. and Lehmann, T. (2020). The labor market in Switzerland, 2000-2018, IZA World of Labor 402. Leukert-Becker, K. and Zweifel, P. (2014). Preferences for health insurance in Germany and the Netherlands – a tale of two countries, Health Economics Review 4(22). Lindahl, E. (1919). Die Gerechtigkeit der Besteuerung: Eine Analyse der Steuerprinzipien auf Grundlage der Grenznutzentheorie, Lund. Lizzeri, A. and Persico, N. (2001). The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives, The American Economic Review 91(1): 225–239. Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated Choice Methods - Analysis and Application, Cambridge University Press. Luce, D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior, Wiley and Sons, New York. Macrotrends (2023a). Luxembourg Immigration Statistics 1960-2023, https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/CHE/switzerland/immigration-statistics. Macrotrends (2023b). Switzerland Immigration Statistics 1960-2023, https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/CHE/switzerland/immigration-statistics. Manski, C. F. and Lerman, S. F. (1977). The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice-Based Samples, Econometrica 45(8): 1977–1988. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Quantitative Choice Behavior, in: Frontiers of Economics, pp. 105–142. ed. P. Zarembka, Academic Press, New York. McFadden, D. (1981). Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice, in: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, pp. 198–272. ed. by Ch. Manski and D. McFadden, MIT Press. McFadden, D. (2001). Economic Choices, The American Economic Review 91(3): 351–378. Meltzer, A. H. and Richard, S. F. (1981). A Rational Theory of the Size of Government, Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 914–927. Merino-Castello, A. (2003). Eliciting Consumers’ Preferences Using Stated Preference Discrete-Choice Models: Contingent Ranking versus Choice Experiment, University Pompeu Fabra Economics and Business Working Paper No. 705. Milesi-Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R. and Rostagno, M. (2002). Electoral Systems and Public Spending, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 609–657. Neustadt, I. (2011). Do Religious Beliefs Explain Preferences for Income Redistribution? Experimental Evidence, CESifo Economic Studies 57(4): 623–652. Neustadt, I. and Zweifel, P. (2015). Is the Welfare State Sustainable? Experimental Evidence, International Journal of Economics and Finance 7(6): 60–79. Neustadt, I. and Zweifel, P. (2017). Do Income Status and Mobility Determine Demand for Income Redistribution? Experimental Evidence, WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics 14: 87–99. OBSAN (2010). Gesundheit im Kanton Freiburg: Ergebnisse aus der Schweizerischen Gesundheitsbefragung 2007, OBSAN Report 43 on the Swiss Health Survey, Swiss Health Observatory (OBSAN), Fribourg. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy, MIT Press. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2003). The Economic Effects of Constitutions, Munich Lectures in Economics, MIT Press. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Roberts, K. W. S. (1977). Voting over Income Tax Schedules, Journal of Public Economics 8: 329–340. Romer, T. (1975). Individual Welfare, Majory Voting, and the Properties of a Linear Income Tax, Journal of Public Economics 4: 163–185. Ryan, M. (2004). A Comparison on Stated Preference Methods for Estimating Monetary Values, Health Economics 13(3): 291–296. Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour, Economics 5(17): 61–71. Schindall, J. (2009). Switzerland’s Non-EU Immigrants: Their Integration and Swiss Attitudes, Migration Policy Institute, June 9, 2009. SECO (2010). Arbeitslosigkeit in der Schweiz 2009, BFS/SECO Report on Unemployment in Switzerland, State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), Neuchatel. Sherman, A., Trisi, D. and Parrott, S. (2013). Various Supports for Low-Income Families Reduce Poverty and Have Long-Term Positive Effects on Families and Children, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Telser, H. (2002). Nutzenmessung im Gesundheitswesen (Measurement of Utility in Health Care), Kovac, Hamburg. Wicksell, K. (1896). Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen nebst Darstellung und Kritik des Steuerwesens Schwedens, Jena. Zweifel, P. and Frech, H. I. (2016). Why 'optimal' payment for healthcare providers can never be optimal under community rating, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 14(1): 9–20. Zweifel, P. and Neustadt, I. (2013). Why Does Income Redistribution Differ between Countries? Comparative Evidence from Germany and Switzerland, CESifo DICE Report. Journal for Institutional Comparisons 11(3): 39–47. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/119608 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Redistribution in Whose Favor? Preferences with Regard to Nationality and Type of Beneficiaries. (deposited 27 Dec 2023 10:04)
-
Redistribution in Whose Favor? Preferences with Regard to Nationality and Type of Beneficiaries. (deposited 27 Dec 2023 14:30)
- Redistribution in Whose Favor? Preferences with Regard to Types of Beneficiaries and Their Nationalities. (deposited 04 Jan 2024 15:46) [Currently Displayed]
-
Redistribution in Whose Favor? Preferences with Regard to Nationality and Type of Beneficiaries. (deposited 27 Dec 2023 14:30)