Schönenberger, Felix (2024): Out of Office, Out of Step? Re-election Concners and Ideological Shirking in Lame Duck Sessions of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_120159.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Do elections constrain incumbent politicians’ policy choices? To answer this longstanding question, this paper proposes a novel identification strategy to separate electoral incentives from selection effects. Taking advantage of the unique setup of lame-duck sessions in the U.S. Congress, where lame-duck incumbents who lost re-election vote on the same issues as their re-elected colleagues, I use a close election regression discontinuity design to exploit quasirandom assignment of re-election seeking representatives to lame-duck status, which is orthogonal to voter preferences and incumbents’ type. Comparing within-incumbent changes in roll call voting of barely unseated lame ducks to narrowly re-elected co-partisans serving the same congressional term, I find that lame ducks revert to more extreme positions with lame-duck Democrats (Republicans) voting more liberally (conservatively). Consistent with lame ducks’ loss of re-election incentives driving the result, the effect of lame-duck status on roll call extremism is more pronounced among ex-ante more vulnerable legislators. I also consider, but ultimately dismiss, several other mechanisms including emotional backlash, logrolling motives, party control, and selective abstention.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Out of Office, Out of Step? Re-election Concners and Ideological Shirking in Lame Duck Sessions of the U.S. House of Representatives |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Elections, Accountability, Legislator Behavior, Polarization |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J45 - Public Sector Labor Markets P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy |
Item ID: | 120159 |
Depositing User: | Felix Schönenberger |
Date Deposited: | 09 Mar 2024 02:59 |
Last Modified: | 09 Mar 2024 02:59 |
References: | Aidt, Toke S. and Julia Shvets, “Distributive Politics and Electoral Incentives: Evidence from Seven US State Legislatures,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2012, 4 (3), 1–29. Alesina, Alberto, “Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-Party System With Rational Vot- ers,” The American Economic Review, 1988, 78 (4), 796–805. Alesina, Alberto and Howard Rosenthal, “Partisan Cycles in Congressional Elections and the Macroeconomy,”American Political Science Review, 1989, 83 (2), 373–398. Alesina, Alberto and Howard Rosenthal, “A Theory of Divided Government,” Econometrica, 1996, pp. 1311–1341. Alt, James, Ethan Bueno de Mesquita, and Shanna Rose, “Disentangling Accountability and Competence in Elections: Evidence from US Term Limits,” The Journal of Politics, 2011, 73 (1), 171–186. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Philip Edward Jones, “Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting,” American Journal of Political Science, 2010, 54 (3), 583–597. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Shiro Kuriwaki, “Congressional Representation: Accountability From the Constituent’s Perspective,” American Journal of Political Science (forthcoming), 2022, 66 (1), 123–139. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder Jr., and Charles Stewart III, “Candidate Positioning in US House Elections,” American Journal of Political Science, 2001, 45 (1), 136–159. Aruoba, S Borag˘ an, Allan Drazen, and Razvan Vlaicu, “A Structural Model of Electoral Account- ability,” International Economic Review, 2019, 60 (2), 517–545. Banks, Jeffrey S. and Rangarajan K. Sundaram, “Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in a Re- peated Elections Model,” in William A. Barnett, Melvin J. Hinich, and Norman J. Schofield, eds., Political Economy: Institutions, Competition and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 295–312. Barro, Robert J., “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model,” Public Choice, 1973, 14 (1), 19–42. Bartels, Larry M., “Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections,” American Journal of Political Science, 1996, 40 (1), 194–230. Battaglini, Marco, Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, and Eleonora Patacchini, “Logrolling in Congress,” NBER Working Paper, 2023. Berdejo´, Carlos and Noam Yuchtman, “Crime, Punishment, and Politics: An Analysis of Political Cycles in Criminal Sentencing,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 95 (3), 741–756. Besley, Timothy and Anne Case, “Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110 (3), 769– 798. Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate, “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112 (1), 85–114. Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate, “Elected versus Appointed Regulators: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1 (5), 1176–1206. Bordignon, Massimo, Tommaso Nannicini, and Guido Tabellini, “Moderating Political Extrem- ism: Single Round versus Runoff Elections Under Plurality Rule,” American Economic Review, 2016, 106 (8), 2349–2370. Bronars, Stephen G. and John R. Lott Jr, “Do Campaign Donations Alter How a Politician Votes? Or, do Donors Support Candidates Who Value the Same Things that They Do?,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 1997, 40 (2), 317–350. Buchanan, James M. and Gordon Tullock, The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitu- tional Democracy, Vol. 100, University of Michigan Press, 1965. Calonico, Sebastian, Matias D. Cattaneo, and Roc´ıo Titiunik, “Robust Nonparametric Confi- dence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs,” Econometrica, 2014, 82 (6), 2295–2326. Calonico, Sebastian, Matias D. Cattaneo Max H. Farrell, and Roc´ıo Titiunik, “Regression Discontinuity Designs Using Covariates,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 2019, 101 (3), 442–451. Calvert, Randall L., “Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence,” American Journal of Political Science, 1985, pp. 69–95. Canen, Nathan, Chad Kendall, and Francesco Trebbi, “Unbundling Polarization,” Econometrica, 2020, 88 (3), 1197–1233. Canen, Nathan, Chad Kendall, and Francesco Trebbi, “Political Parties as Drivers of U.S. Polarization: 1927-2018,” NBER Working Paper, 2021. Canes-Wrone, Brandice, David W. Brady, and John F. Cogan, “Out of Step, Out of Office: Elec- toral Accountability and House Members’ Voting,” American Political Science Review, 2002, 96 (1), 127–140. Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Julia Rabinovich, and Craig Volden, “Who Parties? Floor Voting, District Ideology, and Elec- toral Margins,” in David Brady and Mathew McCubbins, eds., Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress, Vol. 2 Stanford University Press Stanford, CA 2007, pp. 113–25. Card, David and Gordon B. Dahl, “Family Violence and Football: The Effect of Unexpected Emo- tional Cues on Violent Behavior,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2011, 126 (1), 103–143. Carrubba, Clifford J. and Craig Volden, “Coalitional Politics and Logrolling in Legislative Insti- tutions,” American Journal of Political Science, 2000, pp. 261–277. Carson, Jamie L., Gregory Koger, Matthew J. Lebo, and Everett Young, “The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress,” American Journal of Political Science, 2010, 54 (3), 598–616. Carson, Jamie L, Michael H. Crespin, Jeffery A. Jenkins, and Ryan J. Vander Wielen, “Shirking in the Contemporary Congress: A Reappraisal,” Political Analysis, 2004, 12 (2), 176–179. Casella, Alessandra and Antonin Mace´, “Does Vote Trading Improve Welfare?,” Annual Review of Economics, 2021, 13, 57–86. Casella, Alessandra and Thomas Palfrey, “Trading Votes for Votes. A Dynamic Theory,” Econometrica, 2019, 87 (2), 631–652. Cattaneo, Matias D., Michael Jansson, and Xinwei Ma, “Simple Local Polynomial Density Esti- mators,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2020, 115 (531), 1449–1455. Cohen, Lauren and Christopher J. Malloy, “Friends in High Places,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2014, 6 (3), 63–91. Dal Bo´, Ernesto and Mart´ın A. Rossi, “Term Length and the Effort of Politicians,” The Review of Economic Studies, 2011, 78 (4), 1237–1263. De la Cuesta, Brandon and Kosuke Imai, “Misunderstandings About the Regression Discontinu- ity Design in the Study of Close Elections,” Annual Review of Political Science, 2016, 19, 375–396. Delli Carpini, Michael and Scott Keeter, What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996. Di Tella, Rafael, Randy Kotti, Caroline Le Pennec, and Vincent Pons, “Keep Your Enemies Closer: Strategic Platform Adjustments During US and French Elections,” NBER Working Pa- per, 2023. Diermeier, Daniel, Michael Keane, and Antonio Merlo, “A Political Economy Model of Con- gressional Careers,” American Economic Review, 2005, 95 (1), 347–373. Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row, 1957. Duggan, John and Ce´sar Martinelli, “The Political Economy of Dynamic Elections: Accountabil- ity, Commitment, and Responsiveness,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2017, 55 (3), 916–84. Eggers, Andrew C., Anthony Fowler, Jens Hainmueller, Andrew B. Hall, and James M. Snyder Jr., “On the Validity of the Regression Discontinuity Design for Estimating Electoral Effects: New Evidence From Over 40,000 Close Races,” American Journal of Political Science, 2015, 59 (1), 259–274. Eren, Ozkan and Naci Mocan, “Emotional Judges and Unlucky Juveniles,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2018, 10 (3), 171–205. Erikson, Robert S., “The Puzzle of Midterm Loss,” The Journal of Politics, 1988, 50 (4), 1011–1029. Evans, C. Lawrence, The Whips: Building Party Coalitions in Congress, University of Michigan Press, 2018. Fair, Ray C., “Econometrics and Presidential Elections,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1996, 10 (3), 89–102. Fearon, James D., “Electoral Accountability and The Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance,” in Adam Przeworski, Susan C Stokes, and Bernard Manin, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 55–97. Fehr, Ernst and Klaus M. Schmidt, “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999, 114 (3), 817–868. Fehr, Ernst, Oliver Hart, and Christian Zehnder, “Contracts as Reference Points – Experimental Evi- dence,” American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (2), 493–525. Ferejohn, John, “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control,” Public Choice, 1986, 50 (1-3), 5– 25. Ferraz, Claudio and Frederico Finan, “Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments,” American Economic Review, 2011, 101 (4), 1274–1311. Figlio, David N., “The Effect of Retirement on Political Shirking: Evidence From Congressional Voting,” Public Finance Quarterly, 1995, 23 (2), 226–241. Fisman, Raymond, Nikolaj A. Harmon, Emir Kamenica, and Inger Munk, “Labor Supply of Politicians,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2015, 13 (5), 871–905. Fiva, Jon H. and Oda Nedrega˚rd, “How Does Party Discipline Affect Legislative Behavior? Ev- idence from Within-Term Variation in Lame-Duck Status,” Quarterly Journal of Political Science (forthcoming), 2023. Fouirnaies, Alexander and Andrew B. Hall, “How Do Electoral Incentives Affect Legislator Be- havior? Evidence From US State Legislatures,” American Political Science Review, 2022, 116 (2), 662–676. Fowler, Anthony and Michele Margolis, “The Political Consequences of Uninformed Voters,” Electoral Studies, 2014, 34, 100–110. Funk, Patricia and Christina Gathmann, “How Do Electoral Systems Affect Fiscal Policy? Evi- dence From Cantonal Parliaments, 1890–2000,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2013, 11 (5), 1178–1203. Gagliarducci, Stefano and Tommaso Nannicini, “Do Better Paid Politicians Perform Better? Dis- entangling Incentives From Selection,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2013, 11 (2), 369–398. Gagliarducci, Stefano and Tommaso Nannicini, and Paolo Naticchioni, “Electoral Rules and Politicians’ Behavior: A Micro Test,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2011, 3 (3), 144–174. Glaeser, Edward L., Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto, and Jesse M. Shapiro, “Strategic Extremism: Why Republicans and Democrats Divide on Religious Values,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, 120 (4), 1283–1330. Grembi, Veronica, Tommaso Nannicini, and Ugo Troiano, “Do Fiscal Rules Matter?,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2016, pp. 1–30. Griffin, John D., “Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis,” The Journal of Politics, 2006, 68 (4), 911–921. Grossmann, Matt, Caleb Lucas, Josh McCrain, and Ian Ostrander, CongressData, East Lansing, MI: Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, 2022. Published online: https://cspp. ippsr.msu.edu/congress/. Hall, Andrew B., “What Happens When Extremists Win Primaries?,” American Political Science Review, 2015, 109 (1), 18–42. Hall, Andrew B., Who Wants to Run? How the Devaluing of Political Office Drives Polarization, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019. Harmon, Nikolaj, Raymond Fisman, and Emir Kamenica, “Peer Effects in Legislative Voting,” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2019, 11 (4), 156–80. Hart, Oliver and John Moore, “Contracts as Reference Points,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2008, 123 (1), 1–48. Herrick, Rebekah, Michael K. Moore, and John R. Hibbing, “Unfastening the Electoral Connec- tion: The Behavior of U.S. Representatives When Reelection Is No Longer a Factor,” The Journal of Politics, 1994, 56 (1), 214–227. Hessami, Zohal, “Accountability and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials,” Re- view of Economics and Statistics, 2018, 100 (1), 51–64. Hotelling, Harold, “Stability in Competition,” The Economic Journal, 1929, 39 (153), 41–57. Huber, Gregory A. and Sanford C. Gordon, “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When it Runs for Office?,” American Journal of Political Science, 2004, 48 (2), 247–263. Hudiburg, Jane A., “Lame Duck Sessions of Congress, 1935-2020 (74tth − 116th Congresses),” Con- gressional Research Service Report R45154, 2022. Iaryczower, Matias, Gabriel Lopez-Moctezuma, and Adam Meirowitz, “Career Concerns and the Dynamics of Electoral Accountability,” American Journal of Political Science, 2022. Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Timothy P. Nokken, “Legislative Shirking in the Pre-Twentieth Amend- ment Era: Presidential Influence, Party Power, and Lame-Duck Sessions of Congress, 1877– 1933,” Studies in American Political Development, 2008, 22 (1), 111–140. Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Timothy P. Nokken, “Partisanship, the Electoral Connection, and Lame-Duck Sessions of Congress, 1877– 2006,” The Journal of Politics, 2008, 70 (2), 450–465. Jones, Daniel B. and Randall Walsh, “How Do Voters Matter? Evidence from US Congressional Redistricting,” Journal of Public Economics, 2018, 158, 25–47. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk,” Econometrica, 1979, 47 (2), 263–291. Ko˝ szegi, Botond and Matthew Rabin, “A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences,” The Quar- terly Journal of Economics, 2006, 121 (4), 1133–1165. Le Pennec, Caroline, “Strategic Campaign Communication: Evidence from 30,000 Candidate Manifestos,” The Economic Journal (forthcoming), 2023. Lee, David S., “Randomized Experiments From Non-random Selection in US House Elections,” Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 142 (2), 675–697. Lee, David S. and Thomas Lemieux, “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2010, 48 (2), 281–355. Lee, David S., Enrico Moretti, and Matthew J. Butler, “Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence From the US House,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004, 119 (3), 807–859. Levitt, Steven D., “How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology,” The American Economic Review, 1996, 86 (3), 425–441. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Mary Stegmaier, “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes,” Annual Review of Political Science, 2000, 3 (1), 183–219. Lewis, Jeffrey B., Keith Poole, Howard Rosenthal, Adam Boche, Aaron Rudkin, and Luke Son- net, Voteview: Congressional Roll-Call Votes Database. 2022. Published online: https://voteview. com. Lim, Claire S. H., “Preferences and Incentives of Appointed and Elected Public Officials: Evidence From State Trial Court Judges,” American Economic Review, 2013, 103 (4), 1360–1397. Lindsta¨dt, Rene´ and Ryan J. Vander Wielen, “Timely Shirking: Time-Dependent Monitoring and its Effects on Legislative Behavior in the US Senate,” Public Choice, 2011, 148, 119–148. List, John A. and Daniel M. Sturm, “How Elections Matter: Theory and Evidence from Environ- mental Policy,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2006, 121 (4), 1249–1281. Lopes da Fonseca, Mariana, “Lame Ducks and Local Fiscal Policy: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Portugal,” The Economic Journal, 2020, 130 (626), 511–533. Lott, John R., “Political Cheating,” Public Choice, 1987, 52 (2), 169–186. Lott, John R., “Attendance Rates, Political Shirking, and the Effect of Post-Elective Office Employment,” Economic Inquiry, 1990, 28 (1), 133–150. Lott, John R. and Michael L. Davis, “A Critical Review and an Extension of the Political Shirking Literature,” Public Choice, 1992, 74 (4), 461–484. Lott, John R., and Stephen G. Bronars, “Time Series Evidence on Shirking in the U.S. House of Representatives,” Public Choice, 1996, 76 (1–2), 125–149. Madison, James, “Federalist No. 52,” in Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, eds., The Federalist Papers, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, [1788] 2009, pp. 123–126. Mateˇjka, Filip and Guido Tabellini, “Electoral Competition With Rationally Inattentive Voters,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2021, 19 (3), 1899–1935. McCarty, Nolan, Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal, “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress,” American Political Science Review, 2001, 95 (3), 673–687. McCrary, Justin, “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test,” Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 142 (2), 698–714. Mian, Atif, Amir Sufi, and Francesco Trebbi, “The Political Economy of the US Mortgage Default Crisis,” American Economic Review, 2010, 100 (5), 1967–98. Miller, Warren E. and Donald E. Stokes, “Constituency Influence in Congress,” American Political Science Review, 1963, 57 (1), 45–56. MIT Election Data and Science Lab, U.S. House Elections 1976 – 2022, Harvard Dataverse, 2017. Published online: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IG0UN2. Mocan, Naci and Duha T. Altindag, “Salaries and Work Effort: An Analysis of the European Union Parliamentarians,” The Economic Journal, 2013, 123 (573), 1130–1167. Myers, Andrew C. W., “Why Do Term Limits Polarize State Legislatures?,” Working Paper, 2023. Nokken, Timothy P., “Uncertainty and Roll-Call Voting in Lame-Duck Sessions of the U.S. House, 1969–2010,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2013, 38 (4), 571–591. Obama, Barack H., “Remarks in Austin, Texas, July 10, 2014,” in U.S. Government Publishing Office, ed., Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, July 1 to December 31, 2014, Washing- ton, D.C.: Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, 2014, pp. 944–952. Olson, Michael P. and Jon C. Rogowski, “Legislative Term Limits and Polarization,” The Journal of Politics, 2020, 82 (2), 572–586. Osborne, Martin J. and Al Slivinski, “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen- Candidates,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1996, 111 (1), 65–96. Passarelli, Francesco and Guido Tabellini, “Emotions and Political Unrest,” Journal of Political Economy, 2017, 125 (3), 903–946. Pomirchy, Michael, “Electoral Proximity and Issue-Specific Responsiveness,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 2023, 87 (3), 662–688. Poole, Keith, Jeffrey B. Lewis, James Lo, and Royce Carroll, “Scaling Roll Call Votes With wnominate in R,” Journal of Statistical Software, 2011, 42, 1–21. Poole, Keith T., “Changing Minds? Not in Congress!,” Public Choice, 2007, 131 (3-4), 435–451. Poole, Keith T. and Howard Rosenthal, “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science, 1985, pp. 357–384. Poole, Keith T. and Thomas Romer, “Ideology,“Shirking”, and Representation,” Public Choice, 1993, 77 (1), 185–196. Rogers, Steven, “Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll Calls and Ideological Repre- sentation,” American Political Science Review, 2017, 111 (3), 555–571. Rothenberg, Lawrence and Mitchell S. Sanders, “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress,” American Journal of Political Science, 2000, 44 (2), 316–325. Sieg, Holger and Chamna Yoon, “Estimating Dynamic Games of Electoral Competition to Evalu- ate Term Limits in U.S. Gubernatorial Elections,” American Economic Review, 2017, 107 (7), 1824– 1857. Smith, Steven S., Party Influence in Congress, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Snyder, James M. Jr. and Michael M. Ting, “Roll Calls, Party Labels, and Elections,” Political Analysis, 2003, 11 (4), 419–444. Snyder, James M. Jr. and Tim Groseclose, “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting,” American Journal of Political Science, 2000, pp. 193–211. Stratmann, Thomas, “The Effects of Logrolling on Congressional Voting,” The American Economic Review, 1992, pp. 1162–1176. Stratmann, Thomas, “Congressional Voting Over Legislative Careers: Shifting Positions and Changing Con- straints,” American Political Science Review, 2000, 94 (3), 665–676. Tirole, Jean, “The Internal Organization of Government,” Oxford Economic Papers, 1994, 46 (1), 1–29. Titiunik, Roc´ıo, “Drawing Your Senator From a Jar: Term Length and Legislative Behavior,” Po- litical Science Research and Methods, 2016, 4 (2), 293–316. Volden, Craig and Alan E. Wiseman, Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Volden, Craig and Alan E. Wiseman, Legislative Effectiveness Scores. House Data from 1973-2022, Center for Effective Lawmaking, 2023. Published online: https://thelawmakers.org/data-download. Washington, Ebonya L., “Female Socialization: How Daughters Affect Their Legislator Fathers,” American Economic Review, 2008, 98 (1), 311–32. Wittman, Donald, “Candidates with Policy Preferences: A Dynamic Model,” Journal of Economic Theory, 1977, 14 (1), 180–189. Wittman, Donald, “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative Theories,” American Political Science Review, 1983, 77 (1), 142–157. Wright, Gerald C. and Michael B. Berkman, “Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections,” American Political Science Review, 1986, 80 (2), 567–588. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/120159 |