The impact of Fiscal decentralization on regional development

Elezi, Shiret (2024): The impact of Fiscal decentralization on regional development.

Abstract

Fiscal decentralization of power from the central to the local level in North Macedonia officially began on July 1st, 2005, and after 20 years there are some changes but in general more than 50% of LGSUs gets transfers from the central government financing were the institutions are located and not real competences for local services, the capital grants don’t follow the municipal development, migration from rural area to urban is more and more evident, this mean that the system from start creates misbalanced financing of LGSUs. The main issue is fiscal decentralization and balanced regional development are closely related instruments and there is a need when making policies for one of these instruments of economic progress to take into account the both of them. RNM, on the one hand, does not have success in the balanced regional development, and on the other hand, there is a need expressed by the Government and other stakeholders for advancing of decentralization. So far, researches are prepared about balanced regional development and fiscal decentralization, but those researches are thematic and concern either regional development or decentralization separately as separate phenomena and do not go into the interactions and impact of fiscal decentralization on the balanced regional development in RNM. This analysis aims to fill that research gap because these phenomena in real life do not act separately from each other and certainly have mutual influence. This is important for policy makers to know that in the advancing of fiscal decentralization laws and policies, those policies and laws cannot separate these two instruments as separate instruments for achieving national goals. For RNM, in addition to the relatively high unbalanced in regional development, it is even more worrying that this, measured by the coefficient of variation of GDP per capita for the regions, is increasing in the period from 2011 to 2022.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: fiscal decentralization, balanced regional development, GDP, inequality, local revenues, GINI coefficient
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H76 - State and Local Government: Other Expenditure Categories; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession

References

[1] Akai N, Sakata M, 2002, “Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States” Journal of Urban Economics, p. 93–108

[2] Arellano M, 1987, “Computing robust standard errors for within-group estimators” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, p. 431–434

[3] Baltagi B H, 1995 Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (John Wiley, Chichester, Sussex)

[4] Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X, 1991, “Convergence across states and regions” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, p. 107–182

[5] Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X, 1995 Economic Growth (McGraw-Hill, New York)

[6] Bilbao-Osorio B, Rodríguez-Pose A, 2004, “From R & D to innovation and economic growth in the EU” Growth and Change, p. 434–455

[7] CEA 2023 (Analysis of disparities between the countries of the Western Balkans Cluster analysis).

[8] Chesire P C, Carbonaro G, 1996, “Urban economic growth in Europe: Testing theory and policy prescriptions” Urban Studies, p.1111–1128

[9] Cowell F, 1995 Measuring Inequality 2nd edition (Prentice Hall, London)

[10] Davies S, Hallet M, 2002, “Interactions between national and regional development”, HWWA discussion paper, Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Hamburg

[11] Davoodi H, Zou H, 1998, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: A cross country study” Journal of Urban Economics, p. 244–257

[12] Dillinger W, 1994, “Decentralization and its implications for urban service delivery” DP 16, Urban Management Program, World Bank, Washington, DC

[13] Dillinger W, 2002, “Brazil: Issues on fiscal federalism”, Report 22523-BR, Brazil Country Management Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC

[14] Ebel R D, Yilmaz S, 2002, “On the measurement and impact of fiscal decentralization”, Policy Research WP 2809, World Bank, Washington, DC

[15] European Commission, 1999 Sixth Periodic Report on the Social and Economic Situation of the Regions in the European Union (European Commission, Brussels)

[16] European Commission, 2004 Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion (European Commission, Brussels)

[17] Ezcurra R, Gil C, Pascual P, Rapún M, 2005, “Inequality, polarisation and regional mobility in the European Union” Urban Studies, p. 1057–1076

[18] Fujita M, Thisse J F, 2002 Economics of Agglomeration (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)

[19] Gil C, Pascual P, Rapún M, 2004, “Regional economic disparities and decentralization” Urban Studies, p.71–94

[20] Jin J, Zou H, 2002, “How does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate, national, and subnational government size?” Journal of Urban Economics, p. 270–293

[21] Kanbur R, Zhang X, 2005, “Fifty years of regional inequality in China: A journey through central planning, reform, and openness” Review of Development Economics, p. 87– 106

[22] Kelejian H, Robinson D, 1997, “Infrastructure productivity estimation and its underlying econometric specification: A sensitivity analysis” Papers in Regional Science, p.115–131

[23] Krugman P, 1991 Geography and Trade (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)

[24] Krugman P, 1998, “What's new about the new economic geography?” Oxford Review f Economic Policy

[25] Kyriacou et.al. (2013): Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance; Papers on regional science, Vol. 94, 1

[26] Kuznets S, 1955, “Economic growth and income inequality” American Economic Review, p. 1–28

[27] Lessmann C. (2012): Regional inequality and decentralization - An empirical analysis; Document de treball de l’IEB 2012/20

[28] Law on financing local self-Government, Official Gazette OF RNM (nr.61//04, 96/04,.22/07,67/07, 156/09,47/11,192/15,244/19, 53/2,77/21, 150/21 and nr.173/22).

[29] Law on Balanced Regional Development. Official Gazette of NRM (24/2021)

[30] Law on Local Self-Government. Official Gazette of NRM (5/2002)

[31] López-Bazo E, 2003, “Growth and convergence across economies: The experience of the European regions”, in Regional Economic Growth, SMEs and the Wider Europe

[32] López-Bazo E, Vayá E, Artis A, 2004, “Regional externalities and growth: Evidence from European regions” Journal of Regional Science, p. 43–73

[33] McKinnon R, 1995, “Intergovernmental competition in Europe with and without a common currency” Journal of Policy Modeling, p. 463–478

[34] McKinnon R, 1997, “Market-preserving fiscal federalism in the American Monetary Union”, in Macroeconomic Dimensions of Public Finance: Essays in Honour of Vito Tanzi Eds Blejer M, Ter-Minassian T (Routledge, London), p. 73–93

[35] Magrini S, 2004, “Regional (di)convergence”, in Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, volume IV Eds Henderson V, Thisse J (North-Holland, Amsterdam), p. 2741– 2796

[36] Martínez-Vázquez J, McNab R, 2003, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth” World Development, p. 1597–1616

[37] Ministry of finance (Annual accounts of the State Budget 2005-2022), www.finance.gov.mk

[38] Oates W, 1972 Fiscal Federalism (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York)

[39] Oates W, 1985, “Searching for Leviathan: An empirical analysis” American Economic Review, p 748–757

[40] Oates W, 1993, “Fiscal decentralization and economic development” National Tax Journal XLVI p. 237–243

[41] Oates W, 1999, “An essay on fiscal federalism” Journal of Economic Literature, p.120-149

[42] Paci R, 1997, “More similar and less equal: Economic growth in the European regions” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, p. 609–634

[43] Petrakos G, Rodríguez-Pose A, Rovolis A, 2005, “Growth, integration, and regional disparities in the European Union” Environment and Planning A, p.1837–1855

[44] Prud'homme R, 1995, “On the dangers of decentralization”, Policy Research WP 1252, World Bank, Washington, DC

[45] Puga D, 2002, “European regional policies in light of recent location theories” Journal of Economic Geography, p. 373–406

[46] Qian Y, Weingast B, 1997, “Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives” Journal of Economic Perspectives, p. 83–92

[47] Quah D, 1996, “Regional convergence clusters across Europe” European Economic Review, p. 951–958

[48] State Audit Office (2022): “Final performance audit report: Balanced regional development with special emphasis on demography”

[49] State statistical office, Regions in RNM 2023

[50] Tanzi, V. (1996). Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects. In M. Bruno and B. Pleskovic (editors), Annual World Bank Conference on Economic Development, p. 539{567. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

[51] USAID (2024) Project for Strengthening Resource Mobilization Activity