Fiscal policy and the business cycle: An argument for non-linear policy rules

Fleischhacker, Jan (2024): Fiscal policy and the business cycle: An argument for non-linear policy rules.

Abstract

In this paper, I explore how fiscal policy decisions relate to the business cycle and, building on that, how the effects of policy interventions may vary depending on when policy is conducted in the business cycle. To assess this, I estimate a small to medium-sized DSGE model with expressive non-linear fiscal and monetary rules using a higher-order approximation.

The estimation procedure employed in this paper combines several existing approaches developed by Herbst and Schorfheide (2016), Jasra et al. (2010), Buchholz, Chopin and Jacob (2021) and Amisano and Tristani (2010) to trade off computation time and inference quality. The model is estimated using Sequential Monte Carlo techniques to estimate the posterior parameter distribution and particle filter techniques to estimate the likelihood. Together, the estimation procedure reduces the estimation from weeks to days by up to 94%, depending on the comparison basis.

To assess the behaviour of the effects of fiscal policy interventions, I sample impulse responses conducted along the historical data. The results present time-varying policy rules in which the effects of fiscal shocks go through deep cycles depending on the initial conditions of the economy. Among the set of fiscal instruments, government consumption goes through the most persistent cycles in its effectiveness in stimulating output. In particular, the effects of government consumption stimulus are estimated to be more effective during the financial crisis and, later, the Covid crisis, while being less effective in periods of above steady state output like the early 2000s.

Relating the effects of specific stimulating shocks to the initial conditions using regression techniques, I show that fiscal policy is more effective at stimulating output if the interest rate and debt are low. Furthermore, the effects of government consumption are estimated to be increasing in output while tax cuts are decreasing.

As a last contribution, I explore how the behaviour of the central bank and government varies depending on the business cycle by analysing sampled policy rule gradients constructed on historical data. For the central bank, the results show that in phases of high output growth, the central bank puts more emphasis on controlling inflation and less on output. As the economy shifts into crisis, the central bank reduces its focus on inflation and shifts towards bringing output growth back to target. For the fiscal side, the behaviour is heavily governed by the current debt level, and, for example, during the high debt periods of the 1990s, labour taxation became increasingly responsive to debt to stabilize the budget.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: DSGE fiscal policy non-linear state-space business cycle particle filter bayes SMC MH RWMH Kalman state-dependend
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C11 - Bayesian Analysis: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

Amisano, G. and Tristani, O. (2007) "EURO AREA INFLATION PERSISTENCE IN AN ESTIMATED NONLINEAR DSGE MODEL", ecb.europa. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp754.pdf (Accessed: February 21, 2023).

Amisano, G. and Tristani, O. (2010) “Euro area inflation persistence in an estimated nonlinear DSGE model,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(10), pp. 1837–1858. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.05.001.

An, S. and Schorfheide, F. (2007) “Bayesian Analysis of DSGE Models,” Econometric Reviews, 26(2-4), pp. 113–172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930701220071.

Andreasen, M.M., Fernández-Villaverde, J. and Rubio-Ramírez, J.F. (2017) “The pruned state-space system for non-linear DSGE models: Theory and empirical applications,” The Review of Economic Studies, 85(1), pp. 1–49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx037.

Auerbach, A. and Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012) “Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), pp. 1–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.2.1.

Baum, A. and Koester, G.B. (2011) The impact of fiscal policy on economic activity over the business cycle – evidence from a threshold VAR analysis, www.bundesbank.de. Deutsche Bundesbank. Available at: https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/703584/e72e35658b3daf9e7286eb40f6962927/mL/2011-03-28-dkp-03-data.pdf (Accessed: March 17, 2023).

Blanchard, O. and Perotti, R. (2002) “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), pp. 1329–1368. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043.

Boubaker, S., Nguyen, D.K. and Paltalidis, N. (2018) “Fiscal policy interventions at the zero lower bound,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 93, pp. 297–314. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2018.01.048.

Buchholz, A., Chopin, N. and Jacob, P.E. (2021) “Adaptive tuning of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo within sequential Monte Carlo,” Bayesian Analysis, 16(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1214/20-ba1222.

Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. and Rebelo, S. (2011) “When Is the Government Spending Multiplier Large?,” Journal of Political Economy, 119(1), pp. 78–121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/659312.

Creal, D. (2007) Sequential Monte Carlo samplers for Bayesian Dsge Models . Available at: https://people.bordeaux.inria.fr/pierre.delmoral/Creal_SMC_2007.pdf (Accessed: January 23, 2023). 78

Davig, T. and Leeper, E. (2009) “Monetary-fiscal policy interactions and fiscal stimulus.” Available at: https://doi.org/10.3386/w15133.

Del Moral, P., Doucet, A. and Jasra, A. (2006) “Sequential Monte Carlo samplers,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 68(3), pp. 411–436. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00553.x.

Demirel, U.D. (2021) “The short-term effects of tax changes: The role of State dependence,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 117, pp. 918–934. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.07.002.

Drautzburg, T. and Uhlig, H. (2015) “Fiscal stimulus and distortionary taxation,” Review of Economic Dynamics, 18(4), pp. 894–920. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2015.09.003.

Fazzari, S.M., Morley, J. and Panovska, I. (2014) “State-dependent effects of fiscal policy,” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 19(3), pp. 285–315. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2014-0022.

Fernández-Villaverde, J. and Rubio-Ramírez, J.F. (2005) “Estimating dynamic equilibrium economies: linear versus nonlinear likelihood,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(7), pp. 891–910. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.814.

Fernández-Villaverde, J. et al. (2015) “Fiscal Volatility Shocks and Economic Activity,” American Economic Review, 105(11), pp. 3352–3384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121236.

Ferraresi, T., Roventini, A. and Fagiolo, G. (2014) “Fiscal Policies and Credit Regimes: A TVAR Approach,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(7), pp. 1047–1072. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2420.

Fotiou, A. (2022) “Non-linearities in fiscal policy: The role of debt,” European Economic Review, 150, p. 104212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104212.

Fotiou, A., Shen, W. and Yang, S.-C.S. (2020) “The fiscal state-dependent effects of capital income tax cuts,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 117, p. 103860. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103860.

Galí, J., López-Salido, J.D. and Vallés, J. (2007) “Understanding the effects of government spending on consumption,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(1), pp. 227–270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.1.227.

Gomes, S. et al. (2015) “Global policy at the zero lower bound in a large-scale DSGE model,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 50, pp. 134–153. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.09.005. 79

Gomme, P. and Klein, P. (2011) “Second-order approximation of dynamic models without the use of tensors,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35(4), pp. 604–615. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.10.006.

Guerrieri, L. and Iacoviello, M. (2015) “Occbin: A toolkit for solving dynamic models with occasionally binding constraints easily,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 70, pp. 22–38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.08.005.

Herbst, E.P. and Schorfheide, F. (2016) Bayesian estimation of DSGE models. Princeton university press.

Huidrom, R. et al. (2020) “Why do fiscal multipliers depend on fiscal positions?,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 114, pp. 109–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.03.004.

Jasra, A. et al. (2010) “Inference for lévy-driven stochastic volatility models via adaptive sequential Monte Carlo,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 38(1), pp. 1–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9469.2010.00723.x.

Jerow, S. and Wolff, J. (2022) “Fiscal policy and uncertainty,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 145, p. 104559. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104559.

Jones, J.B. (2002) “Has fiscal policy helped stabilize the postwar U.S. economy?,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(4), pp. 709–746. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(02)00113-7.

Kaplan, G. and Violante, G.L. (2014) “A model of the consumption response to fiscal stimulus payments,” Econometrica, 82(4), pp. 1199–1239. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta10528.

Krajewski, P. and Szymańska, A. (2019) “The effectiveness of fiscal policy within business cycle – Ricardians vs. non-Ricardians approach,” Baltic Journal of Economics, 19(2), pp. 195–215. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099x.2019.1609228.

Leeper, E.M., Plante, M. and Traum, N. (2010) “Dynamics of fiscal financing in the United States,” Journal of Econometrics, 156(2), pp. 304–321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.11.001.

Mertens, K. and Ravn, M.O. (2014) “A reconciliation of SVAR and narrative estimates of tax multipliers,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 68, pp. S1–S19. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2013.04.004.

Mountford, A. and Uhlig, H. (2009) “What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks?,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(6), pp. 960–992. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1079. 80

Neal, R.M. (2012) MCMC using Hamiltonian Dynamics, arXiv.org. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1901 (Accessed: January 23, 2023).

Owyang, M. et al. (2013) “Are Government Spending Multipliers Greater During Periods of Slack? Evidence from 20th Century Historical Data,” American Economic Review, 103(3), pp. 129–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.129.

Parker, J.A. (2011) “On Measuring the Effects of Fiscal Policy in Recessions,” Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), pp. 703–718. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.3.703.

Peren Arin, K., Koray, F. and Spagnolo, N. (2015) “Fiscal multipliers in good times and bad times,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 44, pp. 303–311. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2015.01.002.

Pfeiffer, J. (2018) A Guide to Specifying Observation Equations for the Estimation of DSGE Models. Available at: https://www.randomwalk.top/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Pfeifer_2013_Observation_Equations.pdf (Accessed: January 23, 2023).

Ramey, V.A. and Zubairy, S. (2018) “Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from US Historical Data,” Journal of Political Economy, 126(2), pp. 850–901. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/696277. Roeger, W. and in 't Veld, J. (2009) Ec.europa.eu. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication13839_en.pdf (Accessed: 2022).

Romer, C.D. and Romer, D.H. (2010) “The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks,” American Economic Review, 100(3), pp. 763–801. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.763.

Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe Martı́n (2004) “Solving dynamic general equilibrium models using a second-order approximation to the policy function,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(4), pp. 755–775. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1889(03)00043-5.

Sims, E. and Wolff, J. (2013) “The output and welfare effects of government spending shocks over the business cycle.” Available at: https://doi.org/10.3386/w19749.

Sims, E. and Wolff, J. (2018b) “The output and welfare effects of government spending shocks over the business cycle,” International Economic Review, 59(3), pp. 1403–1435. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12308.

Sims, E. and Wolff, J. (2018a) “The state-dependent effects of tax shocks,” European Economic Review, 107, pp. 57–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.