Yakhin, Yossi (2024): Foreign Exchange Interventions in the New-Keynesian Model: Policy, Transmission, and Welfare.
PDF
MPRA_paper_122948.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
The paper introduces foreign exchange interventions (FXIs) into a standard New-Keynesian small open economy model. It solves for the optimal FXI policy, suggests an implementable policy rule, and studies the transmission mechanism of FXIs. Relying on the portfolio balance channel, deviations from the uncovered interest rate parity (UIP) reflect financial inefficiencies. Therefore, a policy rule that stabilizes the UIP premium moves the economy toward its optimal allocation, regardless of the type of shocks it faces. Augmenting the rule with foreign reserves smoothing further improves welfare. The paper discusses the conditions under which strict targeting of the UIP premium is optimal. FXIs are transmitted by affecting the UIP premium. Purchasing foreign reserves increases the UIP premium, thereby raising the effective return home agents face and depreciating the domestic currency. Consequently, domestic demand contracts and export expands. The results are robust to a variety of modeling alternatives for the financial sector.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Foreign Exchange Interventions in the New-Keynesian Model: Policy, Transmission, and Welfare |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Foreign Exchange Interventions; Policy Rule; UIP Premium; Monetary Policy; Open Economy Macroeconomics |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F30 - General F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G15 - International Financial Markets |
Item ID: | 122948 |
Depositing User: | Yossi Yakhin |
Date Deposited: | 15 Dec 2024 10:33 |
Last Modified: | 15 Dec 2024 10:33 |
References: | Adrian, T., C. Erceg, M. Kolasa, J. Linde, and J. Zabczyk (2021). A Quantitative Microfounded Model for the Integrated Policy Framework. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper WP/21/292. Alla, Z., R. A. Espinoza, and A. R. Gosh (2020). FX Intervention in the New Keynesian Model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 52(7), 1755-1791. Amador, M., J. Bianchi, L. Bocola, and F. Perri (2020). Exchange Rate Policies at the Zero Lower Bound. The Review of Economic Studies 87(4), 1605-1645. Argov, E., E. Barnea, A. Binyamini, E. Borenstein, D. Elkayam, and I. Rozenshtrom (2012). MOISE: A DSGE Model for the Israeli Economy. Bank of Israel, Research Department, Discussion Paper 2012.06. Backus, D. K. and P. J. Kehoe (1989). On the Denomination of Government Debt: A Critique of the Portfolio Balance Approach. Journal of Monetary Economics 23(3),, 359-376. Bank of Israel (2010). Bank of Israel Annual Report - 2009. Bank of Israel. Bank of Israel (2022). Bank of Israel Annual Report - 2021. Bank of Israel. Basu, S., E. Boz, G. Gopinath, F. Roch, and F. Unsal (2020). A Conceptual Model for the Integrated Policy Framework. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper WP/20/121. Basu, S., E. Boz, G. Gopinath, F. Roch, and F. Unsal (2023). Integrated Monetary and Financial Policies for Small Open Economies. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper WP/23/161. Benes, J., A. Berg, R. A. Portillo, and D. Vavra (2015). Modeling Sterilized Interventions and Balance Sheet E¤ects of Monetary Policy in a New-Keynesian Framework. Open Economies Review 26(1), 81-108. Benigno, P. andM.Woodford (2012). Linear-Quadratic Approximation of Optimal Policy Problems. Journal of Economic Theory 147(1), 1-42. Calvo, G. A. (1983). Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12(3), 383-398. Caspi, I., A. Friedman, and S. Ribon (2022). The Immediate Impact and Persistent Effect of FX Purchases on the Exchange Rate. International Journal of Central Banking 18(5), 165-195. Cavallino, P. (2019). Capital Flows and Foreign Exchange Intervention. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 11(2), 127-170. Chen, K., M. Kolasa, J. Linde, P. Wang, H. abd Zabczyk, and J. Zhou (2023). An Estimated DSGE Model for Integrated Policy Analysis. International Monetary Fund, Working Paper WP/23/135. Corsetti, G. and P. Pesenti (2001). Welfare and Macroeconomic Interdependence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2), 421-445. Cúrdia, V. and M. Woodford (2011). The Central-Bank Balance Sheet As An Instrument of Monetary Policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 58(1), 54-79. De Paoli, B. (2009). Monetary Policy under Alternative Asset Market Structures: The Case of a Small Open Economy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41(7), 1301-1330. Faltermeier, J., R. Lama, and J. P. Medina (2022). Foreign Exchange Intervention for Commodity Booms and Busts. European Economic Review 143, 104018. Fanelli, S. and L. Straub (2021). A Theory of Foreign Exchange Interventions. The Review of Economic Studies 88(6), 2857-2885. Gabaix, X. and M. Maggiori (2015). International Liquidity and Exchange Rate Dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(3), 1369-1420. Galí, J. (2015). Monetary Policy, In�ation, and the Business Cycle: An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework and Its Applications (Second ed.). Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ). Galí, J. and T. Monacelli (2005). Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy. Review of Economic Studies 72(3), 707-734. Greenwood, J., Z. Hercowitz, and G. W. Hu¤man (1988). Investment, Capacity Utilization, and the Real Business Cycle. American Economic Review 78(3), 402-417. Havránek, T. (2015). Measuring Intertemporal Substitution: The Importance of Method Choices and Selective Reporting. Journal of the European Economic Association 13(6), 1180-1204. Hertrich, M. and D. Nathan (2022). Foreign Exchange Interventions and Their Impact on Expectations: Evidence from the USD/ILS Options Market. Bank of Israel, Research Department, Discussion Paper 2022.10. IMF (2023). Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 2022. International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC. Itskhoki, O. and D. Mukhin (2021). Exchange Rate Disconnect in General Equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy 129(8), 2183-2232. Itskhoki, O. and D. Mukhin (2023). Optimal Exchange Rate Policy. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 31933. Kalemli-Özcan, S. and L. Varela (2023). Five Facts about the UIP Premium. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 28923. Ribon, S. (2017). Why the Bank of Israel Intervenes in the Foreign Exchange Market, and What Happens to the Exchange Rate. Bank of Israel, Research Department, Discussion Paper 2017.04. Ribon, S. and D. Sayag (2013). Price Setting Behavior in Israel - An Empirical Analysis Using Microdata. Bank of Israel, Research Department, Discussion Paper 2013.07. Schmitt-Grohé, S. and M. Uribe (2003). Closing Small Open Economy Models. Journal of International Economics 61(1), 163-185. Sims, C. (1999). Matlab Optimization Software. Quantitative Macroeconomics and Real Business Cycles, QM&RBC Codes 13. Smets, F. and R.Wouters (2003). An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area. Journal of the European Economic Association 1(5), 1123-1175. Smets, F. and R.Wouters (2007). Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach. American Economic Review 97(3), 586-606. Uribe, M. and V. Z. Yue (2006). Country Spreads and Emerging Countries: Who Drives Whom? Journal of International Economics 69(1), 6-36. Wallace, N. (1981). A Modigliani-Miller Theorem for Open-Market Operations. American Economic Review 71(3), 267-274. Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press (Princeton, NJ). Yakhin, Y. (2022). Breaking the UIP: A Model-Equivalence Result. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 54(6), 1889-1904. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/122948 |