The Production of Academic Technological Knowledge. An Exploration at the Research Group Level

Acosta, Manuel and Coronado, Daniel and León, M. Dolores and Moreno, Pedro J. (2020): The Production of Academic Technological Knowledge. An Exploration at the Research Group Level. Published in: Journal of the Knowledge Economy , Vol. 11, (2020): pp. 1003-1025.

Abstract

Public research institutions have a key role in a knowledge-based society as they lead scientific research, and generate patentable technology directly applicable to industrial productive processes. In this paper, we address the latter role. Several well-known papers have dealt with the production of university patents at the level of universities and laboratories; however, despite the relevance of research groups in national research systems, their capacity as producers of patents has been neglected. In this paper, we fill this gap by testing the effect of previous collaborations and the scientific background of the group on the production of knowledge, measured by the number patents. In the framework of a knowledge production function, we estimate several empirical count models with a sample of 1,120 research groups affiliated to the three major public research institutions in Spain. Our findings suggest that the production of patents at the research group level is positively and significantly correlated with the variables capturing private collaboration and scientific background. The results also point to significant differences in the production of technological knowledge across institutions and areas of research.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: collaboration, knowledge production function, patents, research group.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy

References

Acosta, M. and Coronado, D. (2003). Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents. Research Policy, 32, 1783-1803.

Acosta, M., Coronado, D. and Marín, R. (2005). Generating technological knowledge in Spanish universities: An exploration of patent data. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 7, 357-372.

Acosta, M, Coronado, D and Martinez, M. (2015) Does technological diversification spur university patenting? The Journal of Technology Transfer, doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9414-y.

Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2017). National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 997-1008.

Aguiar-Díaz, I., Díaz-Díaz, N. L., Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. L., & De Sáa-Pérez, P. (2016). University–industry relations and research group production: is there a bidirectional relationship?. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(4), 611-632.

Ahmadpoor, M., & Jones, B. F. (2017). The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science, 357(6351), 583-587.

Agrawal, A. and Henderson, R. (2002). Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48, 44-60.

Ankrah, S., & Omar, A. T. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408.

Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Colorado: Westview Press, Boulder.

Ardito, L., Ferraris, A., Petruzzelli, A. M., Bresciani, S., and Del Giudice, M. (2018). The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.030

Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U. and Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37, 1865-1883.

Arza, V., & López, A. (2011). Firms’ linkages with public research organisations in Argentina: Drivers, perceptions and behaviours. Technovation, 31(8), 384-400.

Azagra-Caro, J.M., Archontakis, F., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A. and Fernández-de-Lucio, I. (2006). Faculty support for the objectives of university-industry relations versus degree of R&D cooperation: The importance of regional absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 35, 37-55.

Azagra-Caro, J. M., Carayol, N., and Llerena, P. (2006). Patent production at a European research university: exploratory evidence at the laboratory level. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 257-268.

Azagra Caro, J.M., Fernández de Lucio, I., and Gutiérrez Gracia, A. (2003). University patents: output and input indicators of what?. Research Evaluation, 12, 5-16.

Azoulay, P., Ding, W., and Stuart, T. (2007). The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: Demographics or opportunities?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 599-623.

Balconi, M., Brusoni, S., & Orsenigo, L. (2010). In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research policy, 39(1), 1-13.

Baldini, N. (2006). University patenting and licensing activity: a review of the literature. Research evaluation, 15(3), 197-207.

Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., and Sobrero, M., (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35, 518-532.

Barjak, F., and Robinson, S. (2007). International collaboration, mobility and team diversity in the life sciences: impact on research performance. Social Geography Discussions, 3, 121–157.

Barletta, F., Yoguel, G., Pereira, M., & Rodríguez, S. (2017). Exploring scientific productivity and transfer activities: Evidence from Argentinean ICT research groups. Research Policy, 46, 1361–1369.

Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., Causino, N., and Louis, K.S. (1996). Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry. The New England of Medicine, 335, 1734-17

Blundell, R., Griffith, R., and Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. The Review of Economic Studies, 66, 529.

Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy, 29(4-5), 627-655.

Bozeman, B., & Pandey, S. (1994). Cooperative R&D in government laboratories: comparing the US and Japan. Technovation, 14(3), 145-159.

Braczyk, H. J., Cooke, P. N., & Heidenreich, M. (Eds.). (1998). Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world. Psychology Press.

Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research policy, 39(7), 858-868.

Buenstorf, G. (2009). Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Research Policy, 38, 281–292.

Cameron, A., and Trivedi, P. (1986). Econometrics models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29-53.

Cameron, A., and Trivedi, P. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234.

Carayannis, E. G., Cherepovitsyn, A. Y., and Ilinova, A. A. (2015). Technology commercialization in entrepreneurial universities: the US and Russian experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer, doi: 10.1007/s10961-015-9406-y.

Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48(1), 148-162.

Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32, 887-908.

Coronado, D., Flores, E., & Martínez, M. A. (2017). The role of regional economic specialization in the production of university-owned patents. The Annals of Regional Science, 59(2), 513-533.

Coupé, T. (2003). Science is golden: academic R&D and university patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 31-46.

Crespi, G., D’Este, P., Fontana, R., and Geuna, A. (2011). The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy, 40, 55–68

Della Malva, A., Lissoni, F., and Llerena, P. (2013). Institutional change and academic patenting: French universities and the Innovation Act of 1999. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23(1), 211-239.

D’Este, P., and Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial universityand individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36, 316–339.

Ekvall, G. (1997). Organizational Conditions and Levels of Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6, 195-205.

Emodi, N. V., Murthy, G. P., Emodi, C. C., & Emodi, A. S. A. (2017). A Literature Review on the Factors Influencing Patent Propensity. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(03), 1750015, 1-30.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university´. Research Policy, 32, 109-121.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122-129.

Fabrizio, K., and DiMinin, A. (2008). Commercializing the laboratory: The relationship between faculty patenting and publishing. Research Policy, 37, 914–931.

Fernández-Zubieta, A., Andújar-Nagore, I., Giachi, S., & Fernández-Esquinas, M. (2016). New Organizational Arrangements for Public-Private Research Collaboration. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 80-103.

Foltz, J., Barham, B., and Kim, K. (2000). Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production. Agribusiness, 16, 82.

Foltz, J., K., Kim, K., and Barham, B. (2001). A Dynamic Count Data Analysis of University Ag-Biotech Patents, Marketing Policy Center Research Report, 56.

Foltz, J.D., Kim, K., and Barham, B. (2003). A Dynamic Analysis of University Agricultural Biotechnology Patent Production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 187-197.

Ford, C.M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112-1142.

Fisch, C, Hassel, T, Sandner, P., and Block, J. (2015). University patenting: a comparison of 300 leading universities worldwide. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 318–345.

Geuna, A., and Nesta, L.J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35, 790-807.

Glauber, J., Wollersheim, J., Sandner, P., & Welpe, I. M. (2015). The patenting activity of German Universities. Journal of Business Economics, 85(7), 719-757.

Godin, B. (2006). The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(6), 639-667.

Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.

Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661-1707.

Gurmu, S., Black, G.C., and Stephan, P.E. (2010). The Knowledge production function for university patenting. Economic Inquiry, 48, 192-213.

Hausman, J.A., Hall, B.H., and Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-r&d relationship. Econometrica, (pre-1986) 52, 909.

Heilbron, D. (1994). Zero-altered and other regression models for count data with added zeros. Biometrical Journal, 36, 531–547.

Hemlin, S. (2009). Creative Knowledge Environments: An Interview Study with Group Members and Group Leaders of University and Industry R&D Groups in Biotechnology. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 278-285.

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C.M., and Martin, B.R. (2004). Creative Knowledge Environments: The Influences on Creativity in Research and Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C.M., and Martin, B.R. (2008). Creative Knowledge Environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 196-210.

Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., and Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and statistics, 80, 119-128.

Henze, I., Van Driel, J., and Verloop, N. (2007). Science Teachers' Knowledge about Teaching Models and Modelling in the Context of a New Syllabus on Public Understanding of Science. Research in Science Education, 37, 99-122.

Henze, I., Van Driel, J.H., and Verloop, N. (2009). Experienced Science Teachers' Learning in the Context of Educational Innovation. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 184-199.

Hormiga, E., de Saá-Pérez, P., Díaz-Díaz, N. L., Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. L., & Aguiar-Diaz, I. (2017). The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on the performance of academic research groups: the mediating role of knowledge sharing. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(1), 10-32.

Janger, J., Schubert, T., Andries, P., Rammer, C., & Hoskens, M. (2017). The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?. Research Policy, 46(1), 30-42.

Klitkou, A., and Gulbrandsen, M. (2010). The relationship between academic patenting and scientific publishingin Norway. Scientometrics, 82, 93–108.

Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34, 1-12.

Lawson, C (2013): Academic patenting: the importance of industry support. The Journal Technology Transfer, 38. 509-535.

Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: An analytical framework. London: Pinter.

Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. New York and London: Oxford University Press.

Marozau, R., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2016). Impacts of universities in different stages of economic development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Advanced online publication. DOI 10.1007/s13132-016-0359-7.

Miyata, Y. (2000). ´An empirical analysis of innovative activity of universities in the United States´. Technovation, 20, 413-425.

Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E., & D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy, 43(4), 696-706.

Owen-Smith, J., and Powell, W. (2003). The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy, 32, 1695-1711.

Payne, A., and Siow, A. (2003). Does Federal Research Funding Increase University Research Output?. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3, 1018.

Powell, W.W., and Owen-Smith, J. (1998). Universities and the Market for Intellectual Property in the Life Sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 253-277.

Ramos-Vielba, I; Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., and Woolley, R (2016). Scientific research groups’ cooperation with firms and government agencies: motivations and barriers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 558-585.

Rizzo, U., and Ramaciotti, L. (2014). The determinants of academic patenting by Italian universities. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26. 469–483

Romano, M., Del Giudice, M., & Nicotra, M. (2014). Knowledge creation and exploitation in Italian universities: the role of internal policies for patent activity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(5), 952-970.

Saragossi, S., and Bruno van Pottelsberghe, P. (2003). What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 47-51.

Skrondal, A., and Rabe–Hesketh, S. (2008) Multilevel and related models for longitudinal data. In: Leeuw, J.D and Meijer, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Multilevel Analysis (pp. 275-299). New York: Springer.

Stephan, P.E., Gurmu, S., Sumell, A.J., Black, G. (2007). Who's patenting in the university? evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 16, 71-99.

Tartari, V., & Breschi, S. (2012). Set them free: scientists' evaluations of the benefits and costs of university–industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1117-1147.

Vabo, A., Alvsvåg, A., Kyvik, S., and Reymert, I. (2016). The establishment of formal research groups in higher education institutions. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, vol 2 (2-3), 1-11.

Van Zeebroeck, N., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., & Guellec, D. (2008). Patents and academic research: a state of the art. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(2), 246-263.

Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86-102.

Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 307-333.

Wang, C., and Guan, J. (2010). The role of patenting activity for scientific research: A study of academic inventors from China’s nanotechnology. Journal of Informetrics, 4. 338–350.

Weckowska, D. M., Molas‐Gallart, J., Tang, P., Twigg, D., Castro‐Martínez, E., Kijeńska‐Dąbrowska, I., ... & Meyer, M. (2018). University patenting and technology commercialization–legal frameworks and the importance of local practice. R&D Management, 48(1), 88-108.

Wong, P. K., and Singh, A. (2010). University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality ofscientific publications. Scientometrics, 83, 271–294.

Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., and Griffin, R.W. (1993). ´Toward a theory of organizational creativity. ´Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.

Wooldridge, J.M. (2003). Introductory Econometrics, 2 ed. Mason Ohio: South-Western.