Skokan, Karel and Rumpel, Petr (2007): Constructing Regional Advantage: Does it matter for Czech regions? Published in: Econ ´07 , Vol. 14, No. 1 (2007): pp. 187-194.
Download (210kB) | Preview
Innovation and competitiveness are two concepts which govern the national and regional policies throughout the world. Innovation is the key driver of global economic competitiveness. Regions are considered a key level where innovation processes are shaped, coordinated and governed through localized capabilities. While until recently competitiveness of economies was developed from comparative or competitive advantages, in the era of knowledge economy the new theory of constructed advantage allows for more attention to the role and impact of the public sector and public-private partnership in the economy, based upon the dimensions related and unrelated variety and differentiated knowledge bases. The key to the constructed advantage is regional innovation systems approach. The introduction to the new theory is explained in the paper in the view of European collaborative research project and the first assessment of how policies for constructing regional advantage can work within the environment of specific regions of the Czech Republic is proposed.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Constructing Regional Advantage: Does it matter for Czech regions?|
|Keywords:||Regional innovation system; comparative, competitive and constructed advantage; related and unrelated varieties; differentiated knowledge bases|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
|Depositing User:||Karel Skokan|
|Date Deposited:||27. Dec 2008 06:08|
|Last Modified:||23. Feb 2015 11:46|
1.ASHEIM, B. BOSCHMA, R. COOKE, P. (2007) Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Working paper. Lund: CIRCLE. Available at http://econ.geo.uu.nl/boschma/artashboscooke2.pdf.
2.ASHEIM, B. COENEN, L. MOODYSSON, J. VANG. J. (2007) Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy. Working paper. Lund: CIRCLE, 2007.
3.BEST, M. (2001) The new competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.BOSCHMA, R. IAMMARINO, S. (2007) Related variety and regional growth in Italy. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series. Paper No. 162. University of Sussex. Available at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/sewp162.pdf.
5.CAMAGNI, R. (2002) On the concept of territorial competitiveness: sound or misleading? Urban Studies, 39, pp. 2395-2411.
6.COOKE, P. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2006) Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage. Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (1), 5-15.
7.DE LA MOTHE, J. MALLORY, G. (2004) Local Knowledge and the Strategy of Constructing Advantage: The Role of Community Alliances. International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM), Vol. 27, No.8, pp. 809 – 820.
8.EC (2006) Constructing regional advantage. Full Report. Principles, perspectives, policies. Belgium: European Communities.
9.ESPON (2006a) Project 3.4.2 Territorial impacts of EU economic policies and location of economic activities. Final Report, October 2006. Luxemburg: ESPON Monitoring Committee.
10.ESPON (2006b) Territory matters for competitiveness and cohesion. ESPON Synthesis Report III. Luxemburg: ESPON Monitoring Committee.
11.ETZKOWITZ, H. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000) “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 109-123.
12.ETZKOWITZ, H. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2003) Can “the Public” Be Considered as a Fourth Helix in University-Industry-Government Relations? Report of the Fourth Triple Helix Conference. Science & Public Policy, 30(1), 55-61.
13.FOJTÍKOVÁ, L. (2007). Regional Trade Agreements: Complement or substitute of multilateralism? In: Sborník abstraktů. Liberecké ekonomické fórum 2007. VIII. Mezinárodní konference pořádaná u příležitosti 15. výročí založení Hospodářské fakulty TU v Liberci. Liberec: Technická univerzita, Hospodářská fakulta.
14.MARTIN, R. L. (2004) A Study on the Factors of Regional Competitiveness. A draft final report for The European Commission Directorate-General Regional Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge Econometrics.
15.MASKELL, P. MALMBERG, A. (1997) Towards an explanation of regional specialization and industry agglomeration. European Planning Studies, 5: 1, pp. 25-41.
16.MOLLE, W. (2007) European Cohesion Policy. London, New York: Routledge.
17.PORTER, M. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
18.PORTER, M. (1998) On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.