The Effect of Virtual Communication Channels on Human Behavior: A Literature Review

Walther, Sven (2025): The Effect of Virtual Communication Channels on Human Behavior: A Literature Review.

Abstract

As workplaces and social interactions continue shifting toward virtual environments, virtual communication channels like video conferencing and text chats have become fundamental for collaboration and information exchange. However, these channels differ in their capacity to convey information, potentially shaping the impact of communication on behavior through various mechanisms, such as anonymity. This review examines 21 studies to assess how face-to-face and different virtual communication channels affect human behavior. The results suggest that relying exclusively on virtual communication can impair behavior in some situations, such as group cooperation or creativity. This issue can be mitigated using richer communication channels such as video or audio. However, especially in one-way messages, using richer communication channels that convey non-verbal information is not always advantageous and poses some risks. This illustrates the complexity of using different communication channels and highlights the need for future research. The insights from this review have important implications for organizations and individuals, emphasizing the crucial role of using appropriate communication channels in virtual environments. Effective channel selection can enhance cooperation and innovation, thereby contributing to the broader discussion on the future of work in remote and hybrid settings.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: virtual communication; communication channel; behavior; future of work
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M54 - Labor Management

References

Abatayo, A. L., J. Lynham, and K. Sherstyuk (2018): “Facebook-to-Facebook: online communication and economic cooperation,” Applied Economics Letters, 25, 762–767.

Abatayo, A. L., J. Lynham, and K. Sherstyuk (2020): “Communication, expectations, and trust: An experiment with three media,” Games, 11, 48.

Abeler, J., A. Becker, and A. Falk (2014): “Representative evidence on lying costs,” Journal of Public Economics, 113, 96–104.

Abeler, J., D. Nosenzo, and C. Raymond (2019): “Preferences for truth-telling,” Econometrica, 87, 1115–1153.

Andreoni, J. and R. Petrie (2004): “Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising,” Journal of public Economics, 88, 1605–1623.

Andreoni, J. and R. Petrie (2008): “Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 73–93.

Antonakis, J., G. d’Adda, R. A. Weber, and C. Zehnder (2022): ““Just words? Just speeches?” On the economic value of charismatic leadership,” Management Science, 68, 6355–6381.

Argyle, M. (2013): Bodily communication, Routledge.

Azrieli, Y., C. P. Chambers, and P. J. Healy (2018): “Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis,” Journal of Political Economy, 126, 1472–1503.

Babutsidze, Z., N. Hanaki, and A. Zylbersztejn (2021): “Nonverbal content and trust: An experiment on digital communication,” Economic Inquiry, 59, 1517–1532.

Balliet, D. (2010): “Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analytic review,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, 39–57.

Balliet, D. and P. A. Van Lange (2013): “Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis.” Psychological bulletin, 139, 1090.

Barrero, J. M., N. Bloom, and S. J. Davis (2021): “Why working from home will stick,” Tech. rep., National Bureau of Economic Research.

Barrero, J. M., N. Bloom, and S. J. Davis (2023): “The evolution of work from home,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37, 23–49.

Ben-Ner, A. and L. Putterman (2009): “Trust, communication and contracts: An experiment,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 106–121.

Ben-Ner, A., L. Putterman, and T. Ren (2011): “Lavish returns on cheap talk: Two-way communication in trust games,” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 1–13.

Berg, J., J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe (1995): “Trust, reciprocity, and social history,” Games and economic behavior, 10, 122–142.

Bicchieri, C., A. Lev-On, and A. Chavez (2010): “The medium or the message? Communication relevance and richness in trust games,” Synthese, 176, 125–147.

Blei, D. M., A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan (2003): “Latent dirichlet allocation,” Journal of machine Learning research, 3, 993–1022.

Bloom, N., R. Han, and J. Liang (2022): “How hybrid working from home works out,” Tech. rep., National Bureau of economic research.

Bloom, N., R. Han, and J. Liang (2024): “Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance,” Nature, 630, 920–925.

Bochet, O., T. Page, and L. Putterman (2006): “Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 11–26.

Bohannon, L. S., A. M. Herbert, J. B. Pelz, and E. M. Rantanen (2013): “Eye contact and video-mediated communication: A review,” Displays, 34, 177–185.

Bohnet, I. and B. S. Frey (1999a): “Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment,” American Economic Review, 89, 335–339.

Bohnet, I. and B. S. Frey (1999b): “The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games,” Journal of economic behavior & organization, 38, 43–57.

Brandts, J. and D. J. Cooper (2006): “A change would do you good.... An experimental study on how to overcome coordination failure in organizations,” American Economic Review, 96, 669–693.

Brandts, J., D. J. Cooper, and C. Rott (2019): “Communication in laboratory experiments,” in Handbook of research methods and applications in experimental economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, 401–418.

Brosig, J., A. Ockenfels, and J. Weimann (2003): “The effect of communication media on cooperation,” German Economic Review, 4, 217–241.

Brosig, J., J. Weimann, and C.-L. Yang (2004): “Communication, reputation, and punishment in sequential bargaining experiments,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 576–606.

Brucks, M. S. and J. Levav (2022): “Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation,” Nature, 605, 108–112.

Burke, M. S., J. R. Carter, R. D. Gominiak, and D. F. Ohl (1996): “An experimental note on the allais paradox and monetary incentives,” Empirical Economics, 21, 617–632.

Burnham, T. C. (2003): “Engineering altruism: A theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50, 133–144.

Cason, T. N., R. M. Sheremeta, and J. Zhang (2012): “Communication and efficiency in competitive coordination games,” Games and economic behavior, 76, 26–43.

Centorrino, S., E. Djemai, A. Hopfensitz, M. Milinski, and P. Seabright (2015): “Honest signaling in trust interactions: Smiles rated as genuine induce trust and signal higher earning opportunities,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 8–16.

Charness, G. (2000): “Self-serving cheap talk: A test of Aumann’s conjecture,” Games and Economic Behavior, 33, 177–194.

Charness, G. and M. Dufwenberg (2006): “Promises and partnership,” Econometrica, 74, 1579–1601.

Charness, G. and U. Gneezy (2008): “What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 29–35.

Charness, G., U. Gneezy, and B. Halladay (2016): “Experimental methods: Pay one or pay all,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 131, 141–150.

Choudhury, P., T. Khanna, C. A. Makridis, and K. Schirmann (2024): “Is hybrid work the best of both worlds? Evidence from a field experiment,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–24.

Cohn, A., T. Gesche, and M. A. Mar´echal (2022): “Honesty in the digital age,” Management Science, 68, 827–845.

Conrads, J. and S. Lotz (2015): “The effect of communication channels on dishonest behavior,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 58, 88–93.

Conrads, J. and T. Reggiani (2017): “The effect of communication channels on promise-making and promise-keeping: experimental evidence,” Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 12, 595–611.

Cooper, R., D. V. DeJong, R. Forsythe, and T. W. Ross (1992): “Communication in coordination games,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 739–771.

Daft, R. L. and R. H. Lengel (1986): “Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design,” Management Science, 32, 554–571.

Dawes, R. M., J. McTavish, and H. Shaklee (1977): “Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation.” Journal of personality and social psychology, 35, 1.

Dennis, A. R., R. M. Fuller, and J. S. Valacich (2008): “Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity,” MIS quarterly, 575–600.

Douglas, B. D., P. J. Ewell, and M. Brauer (2023): “Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA,” Plos one, 18, e0279720.

Duffy, J. and N. Feltovich (2006): “Words, deeds, and lies: strategic behaviour in games with multiple signals,” The Review of Economic Studies, 73, 669–688.

Dufwenberg, M. and M. A. Dufwenberg (2018): “Lies in disguise–A theoretical analysis of cheating,” Journal of Economic Theory, 175, 248–264.

Eckel, C. C. and R. Petrie (2011): “Face value,” American Economic Review, 101, 1497–1513.

Engel, C. (2011): “Dictator games: A meta study,” Experimental economics, 14, 583–610.

Fehr, E. and S. G¨achter (2000): “Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity,” Journal of economic perspectives, 14, 159–182.

Fest, S., O. Kvaløy, P. Nieken, and A. Sch¨ottner (2021): “How (not) to motivate online workers: Two controlled field experiments on leadership in the gig economy,” The Leadership Quarterly, 32, 101514.

Fischbacher, U. and F. Föllmi-Heusi (2013): “Lies in disguise—an experimental study on cheating,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 525–547.

Frohlich, N. and J. Oppenheimer (1998): “Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiment,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35, 389–403.

Gallup (2024): “Work Locations for U.S. Employees With Remote-Capable Jobs,” Accessed: 2025-02-21.

Gibbs, M., F. Mengel, and C. Siemroth (2024): “Employee innovation during office work, work from home and hybrid work,” Scientific Reports, 14, 17117.

Gneezy, U. (2005): “Deception: The role of consequences,” American Economic Review, 95, 384–394.

Gneezy, U., A. Kajackaite, and J. Sobel (2018): “Lying aversion and the size of the lie,” American Economic Review, 108, 419–453.

Gneezy, U., B. Rockenbach, and M. Serra-Garcia (2013): “Measuring lying aversion,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, 293–300.

Greiner, B., M. Caravella, and A. E. Roth (2014): “Is avatar-to-avatar communication as effective as face-to-face communication? An Ultimatum Game experiment in First and Second Life,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 374–382.

Grözinger, N., B. Irlenbusch, K. Laske, and M. Schröder (2020): “Innovation and communication media in virtual teams–An experimental study,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 201–218.

Grund, C., C. Harbring, and L. Klinkenberg (2025): “An experiment on creativity in virtual teams,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 231, 106926.

Güth, W., R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwarze (1982): “An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining,” Journal of economic behavior & organization, 3, 367–388.

Harrison, G. W. (1994): Expected utility theory and the experimentalists, Springer.

Hessels, R. S. (2020): “How does gaze to faces support face-to-face interaction? A review and perspective,” Psychonomic bulletin & review, 27, 856–881.

Isaac, R. M., K. F. McCue, and C. R. Plott (1985): “Public goods provision in an experimental environment,” Journal of Public Economics, 26, 51–74.

Isaac, R. M. and J. M. Walker (1988): “Communication and free-riding behavior: The voluntary contribution mechanism,” Economic inquiry, 26, 585–608.

Johnson, N. D. and A. A. Mislin (2011): “Trust games: A meta-analysis,” Journal of economic psychology, 32, 865–889.

Kässi, O., V. Lehdonvirta, and F. Stephany (2021): “How many online workers are there in the world? A data-driven assessment,” Open Research Europe, 1, 53.

Khalmetski, K. and D. Sliwka (2019): “Disguising lies—image concerns and partial lying in cheating games,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 11, 79–110.

Kitchenham, B. A. and S. Charters (2007): “Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering,” Tech. Rep. EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.

Konrad, K. A. (2009): Strategy and dynamics in contests, Oxford University Press.

Kurzban, R. (2001): “The social psychophysics of cooperation: Nonverbal communication in a public goods game,” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 25, 241–259.

Lev-On, A., A. Chavez, and C. Bicchieri (2010): “Group and dyadic communication in trust games,” Rationality and Society, 22, 37–54.

Loewenstein, G. (1999): “Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics,” The Economic Journal, 109, 25–34.

Manzini, P., A. Sadrieh, and N. J. Vriend (2009): “On smiles, winks and handshakes as coordination devices,” The Economic Journal, 119, 826–854.

McGinn, K. L., L. Thompson, and M. H. Bazerman (2003): “Dyadic processes of disclosure and reciprocity in bargaining with communication,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 17–34.

Nieken, P. (2023): “Charisma in the gig economy: The impact of digital leadership and communication channels on performance,” The Leadership Quarterly, 34, 101631.

Nieken, P. and P. W. Schmitz (2023): “Contracting under asymmetric information and externalities: an experimental study,” Experimental Economics, 26, 989–1021.

Nieken, P. and S. Walther (2024): “Honesty in Virtual Communication,” Tech. rep., CESifo Working Paper.

Oh, C. S., J. N. Bailenson, and G. F. Welch (2018): “A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 114.

Oosterbeek, H., R. Sloof, and G. Van De Kuilen (2004): “Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis,” Experimental economics, 7, 171–188.

Pascual-Ezama, D., T. R. Fosgaard, J. C. Cardenas, P. Kujal, R. Veszteg, B. G.- G. de Lia˜no, B. Gunia, D. Weichselbaumer, K. Hilken, A. Antinyan, et al. (2015): “Context-dependent cheating: Experimental evidence from 16 countries,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 379–386.

Rockmann, K. W. and G. B. Northcraft (2008): “To be or not to be trusted: The influence of media richness on defection and deception,” Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 107, 106–122.

Roth, A. E. et al. (1995): “Bargaining experiments,” Handbook of experimental economics, 1, 253–348.

Ruffle, B. J. and Z. Shtudiner (2015): “Are good-looking people more employable?” Management Science, 61, 1760–1776.

Sally, D. (1995): “Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992,” Rationality and society, 7, 58–92.

Scharlemann, J. P., C. C. Eckel, A. Kacelnik, and R. K. Wilson (2001): “The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, 617–640.

Short, J., E. Williams, and B. Christie (1976): The social psychology of telecommunications, Wiley London.

Spence, M. (1973): “Job market signaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 354–374.

Sussman, S. W. and L. Sproull (1999): “Straight talk: Delivering bad news through electronic communication,” Information Systems Research, 10, 150–166.

Tomczak, J., A. Gordon, J. Adams, J. S. Pickering, N. Hodges, and J. K. Evershed (2023): “What over 1,000,000 participants tell us about online research protocols,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17, 1228365.

Torrance, E. P. (1966): “Torrance tests of creative thinking,” Educational and psychological measurement.

Van Huyck, J. B., R. C. Battalio, and R. O. Beil (1990): “Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure,” The American Economic Review, 80, 234–248.

Van Huyck, J. B., R. C. Battalio, and R. O. Beil (1993): “Asset markets as an equilibrium selection mechanism: Coordination failure, game form auctions, and tacit communication,” Games and Economic Behavior, 5, 485–504.

Voslinsky, A. and O. H. Azar (2021): “Incentives in experimental economics,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 93, 101706.

Webster, J. and R. T. Watson (2002): “Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review,” MIS quarterly, xiii–xxiii.

Wilson, R. K. and C. C. Eckel (2006): “Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game,” Political Research Quarterly, 59, 189–202.

Yang, L., D. Holtz, S. Jaffe, S. Suri, S. Sinha, J. Weston, C. Joyce, N. Shah, K. Sherman, B. Hecht, et al. (2022): “The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers,” Nature human behaviour, 6, 43–54.

Zelmer, J. (2003): “Linear public goods experiments: A meta-analysis,” Experimental Economics, 6, 299–310.

Zylbersztejn, A., Z. Babutsidze, and N. Hanaki (2020): “Preferences for observable information in a strategic setting: An experiment,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 170, 268–285.

Zylbersztejn, A., Z. Babutsidze, and N. Hanaki (2021): “Predicting trustworthiness across cultures: An experiment,” Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 727550.

Zylbersztejn, A., Z. Babutsidze, N. Hanaki, and A. Hopfensitz (2024a): “How beautiful people see the world: Cooperativeness judgments of and by beautiful people,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 218, 296–308.

Zylbersztejn, A., Z. Babutsidze, N. Hanaki, and M.-S. Roul (2024b): “Anonymity, nonverbal communication and prosociality in digitized interactions: An experiment on charitable giving,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 105, 102769.