Iran's Sustainability Gap: An Economic Analysis

Hataminia, Soheil and Mohammadzadeh Asl, Nazi (2025): Iran's Sustainability Gap: An Economic Analysis.

Abstract

Iran faces a widening sustainability gap as biocapacity stagnates while the ecological footprint expands. This study investigates how external debt, economic growth, natural resource rents, and renewable energy consumption affect the national load capacity factor—a composite index of biocapacity relative to ecological demand. Annual data for 1995–2023 were compiled from the World Bank and the Global Footprint Network. After verifying integration orders with Augmented Dickey–Fuller tests and selecting an optimal lag length, Johansen cointegration confirmed the presence of a long-run equilibrium relationship. Long-run coefficients were then estimated using Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS). Model adequacy was evaluated with Hansen and Park cointegration tests, Jarque–Bera normality, and Ljung–Box and ARCH diagnostics. FMOLS estimates revealed positive elasticities for external debt (0.12) and renewable energy consumption (0.11), indicating that prudent external financing and clean-energy expansion enhance Iran’s load capacity factor. Conversely, economic growth (–0.96) and natural resource rents (–0.12) exhibited negative elasticities, reflecting the resource-curse effect and the economy’s current position on the upward phase of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Diagnostic tests detected no autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, or coefficient instability. managed sovereign borrowing and accelerated investment in renewables can improve Iran’s environmental carrying capacity, provided that growth strategies become less resource-intensive and rent dependence diminishes. Policy measures should include carbon-linked fiscal rules, green load-capacity bonds, a natural-resource-rent stabilization fund, and an inflation-indexed carbon tax whose proceeds support renewable feed-in tariffs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ecological carrying capacity; Ecological footprint; External debt; Natural resource rent; Renewable energy consumption; Sustainable development; Iran
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q24 - Land; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q25 - Water; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

[1] Akam D, Nathaniel SP, Muili HA, Aluko OA, Adeleye N, Bekun FV. The relationship between external debt and ecological footprint in SANE countries: Insights from Kónya panel causality approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;29:19496–19507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17194-y

[2] AL-Marshadi AH, Aslam M, Janjua AA. Ecological footprints, global sustainability, and the roles of natural resources, financial development, and economic growth. PLOS ONE. 2025;20(3):e0317664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317664

[3] Arrow KJ, Dasgupta P, Goulder LH, Mumford KJ, Oleson K. Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environment and Development Economics. 2012;17(3):317–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000137

[4] Azimi MN, Rahman MM. Renewable energy and ecological footprint nexus: Evidence from dynamic panel threshold technique. Heliyon. 2024;10(13):e33442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33442

[5] Blanchard O. Public debt and low interest rates. American Economic Review. 2019;109(4):1197–1229. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.4.1197

[6] Çakmak EE, Acar S. The nexus between economic growth, renewable energy and ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from most oil-producing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;352:131548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131548

[7] Fatemi M, Rezaei-Moghaddam K, Wackernagel M, Shennan C. Sustainability of environmental management in Iran: An ecological footprint analysis. Iran Agricultural Research. 2018;37(2):53–68. https://doi.org/10.22099/iar.2018.4958

[8] Global Footprint Network. National footprint and biocapacity accounts. 2025. https://data.footprintnetwork.org/

[9] Global Footprint Network. Announcing Earth Overshoot Day 2025: Earth Overshoot Day 2025 falls on July 24 [Press release]. 2025 Jun 5.

[10] Golkhandan A. Public debts; Environment friendly or its destroyer? Threshold role of natural resource rent and control of corruption. Journal of Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. 2024;4(9):175–211. https://doi.org/10.22054/eenr.2025.82155.191

[11] Guloglu B, Caglar AE, Pata UK. Analyzing the determinants of the load capacity factor in OECD countries: Evidence from advanced quantile panel data methods. Gondwana Research. 2023;118:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.013

[12] Grossman GM, Krueger AB. Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995;110(2):353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443

[13] Hacıimamoğlu T, Cengiz V. Are natural resource rents and renewable energy consumption solutions for environmental degradation? Fresh insights from a modified ecological footprint model. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072736

[14] Haji Hashemi L, Salehi E, Rahmati A. Study of bio-capacity and ecological footprint of five continents and position of Iran. Environment and Development. 2021;12(23):133–144.

[15] Hataminia S. Annual dataset for Iran: Load-capacity factor, biocapacity per capita, ecological footprint per capita, external debt, GDP growth, natural resource rents, and renewable energy consumption (1995–2023) (V1) [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. 2025. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KDLDOJ

[16] Hataminia S. soheilhataminia/external-debt-and-load-capacity-iran: EViews replication script for external debt and load-capacity factor analysis (Iran, 1995–2023) (v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. 2025. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15836059

[17] Keshavarz A, Farajzadeh Z. Exploring the impacts of climate change on ecological footprint in Iran: A dynamic input-output analysis. Environmental Development. 2025;55:101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101217

[18] Kolahi M, Abdollahzadeh AH, Noori R. Holistic management approach for social-ecological systems in Iran. Environmental Reviews. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2024-0028

[19] Madani K. Have international sanctions impacted Iran’s environment? World. 2021;2(2):231–252. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2020015

[20] Mehlum H, Moene K, Torvik R. Institutions and the resource curse. The Economic Journal. 2006;116(508):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01045.x

[21] Mehmood U, Tariq S, Aslam MU, et al. Evaluating the impact of digitalization, renewable energy use, and technological innovation on load capacity factor in G8 nations. Scientific Reports. 2023;13:9131. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36373-0

[22] Phillips PCB, Hansen BE. Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes. The Review of Economic Studies. 1990;57(1):99–125. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297545

[23] Sachs JD, Warner AM. The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review. 2001;45(4–6):827–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8

[24] Saleem SH, Ahmed DH, Samour A. Examining the impact of external debt, natural resources, foreign direct investment, and economic growth on ecological sustainability in Brazil. Sustainability. 2024;16(3):1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031037

[25] Shah SS, Nakouwo SN, Murodova G. Exploring the sustainability impact of green bonds on ecological and resource capacities. Renewable Energy. 2025;243:122590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122590

[26] Tehran Times. Iran’s renewable energy capacity surpasses 1,561 MW. 2025 Mar 11. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/510807/Iran-s-renewable-energy-capacity-surpasses-1-561-MW

[27] United Nations Development Programme. Iran tackles its cities' carbon emissions. 2021 Oct 21. https://www.undp.org/blog/iran-tackles-its-cities-carbon-emissions

[28] Wackernagel M, Rees W. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers. 1996.

[29] World Bank. Iran country overview. 2022 Oct 20. Retrieved July 8, 2025. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran/overview

[30] Xu W, Jahanger A, Inuwa N, Samour A, Ibrahim SS. Testing the impact of external sovereign debt on Turkey’s ecological footprint: New evidence from the bootstrap ARDL approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022;10:1010534. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1010534

[31] Ziaabadi M, Zare Mehrjerdi M, Pourtaheri Z. An investigating the effect of economic and social factors on Iran's ecological footprint using the Markov switching-error correction model. Environmental Energy and Economic Research. 2021;5(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.22097/eeer.2021.259922.1178