Kangsik, Choi (2008): Cournot-Bertrand competition in a unionized mixed duopoly.
Download (177kB) | Preview
We investigate a differentiated mixed duopoly in which private and public firms can choose to strategically set prices or quantities by facing a union bargaining process. For the case of a unionized mixed duopoly, only public firm is able to choose a type of contract based on the degree of substitutability in the equilibrium. Focusing on the case of substitute goods, we show that Bertrand (respectively, Cournot) competition entails higher social welfare than Cournot (respectively, Bertrand) competition if the degree of substitutability is relatively small (respectively, large). Thus, there are multiple Nash equilibria in the contract stage of the game. As a result, Singh and Vives' ranking of social welfare is reversed in a range of substitution values for which it is a dominant strategy for public firm to choose either quantity or price contracts.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Cournot-Bertrand competition in a unionized mixed duopoly|
|English Title:||Cournot-Bertrand competition in a unionized mixed duopoly|
|Keywords:||Wage Bargaining; Union; Cournot-Bertrand Competition; Mixed Duopoly|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J51 - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets
|Depositing User:||Kangsik Choi|
|Date Deposited:||17. Jan 2009 05:45|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 05:57|
Amir, R, and J, Y, Jin, 2001,``Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria Compared: Substitutability, Complementarity and Convavity," International Journal of Industrial Organization 19, 303-317.
Barcena-Ruiz, J.C. 2007,``Endogenous Timing in a Mixed Duopoly: Price Competition," Journal of Economics 91, 263-272.
Cheng, L, 1985, ``Comparing Bertrand and Cournot Equilibria: A Geometric Approach," RAND Journal of Economics, 16, 146-152.
Correa-Lopez, M, 2007, ``Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Upstream Suppliers," Jouranl of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 469-505.
Dastidar, K, G. 1997, ``Comparing Cournot and Bertrand in Homogenous Product Market," Journal of Economic Theory, 75, 205-212.
De Fraja, G. 1993, ``Union and Wages in Public and Private Firms: A Game Theoretic Analysis," Oxford Economic Papers, 45, 457-469.
De Fraja, G. and Delbono F., 1989, ``Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly," Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 302-311.
De Fraja, G. and Delbono F., 1990, ``Game Theoretic Models of Mixed Oligopoly," Journal of Economic Surveys, 4, 1-17.
Ghosh, A, and M., Mitra, 2008, ``Comparing Bertrand and Cournot Outcomes in the Presence of Public Firm," University of New South Wales, Australian School of Business, Scool of Economics Discussion Paper: 2008-18
Hackner, J, 2000, ``A Note on Price and Quantity Competition in Differentiated Oligopolies," Journal of Economic Theory, 93, 233-239.
Haskel, J, and A, Sanchis, 1995, ``Privatisation and X-Inefficiency: A Bargaining Approach," Journal of Industrial Economics, 43, 301-321.
Haskel, J, and S, Szymanski, 1993, ``Privatization, Liberalization, Wages and Employment: Theory and Evidence for the UK," Economica, 60, 161-182.
Haucap, J. and C. Wey, 2004,``Unionisation Structures and Innovation Incentives," Economic Journal, 114, C149-C465.
Ishida, J, and N., Matsushima, 2008a, ``Should Civil Servants be Restricted in Wage Bargaining? A Mixed-Duopoly Approach," Kobe University, GSBA Discussion Paper Series 2008-49. forthcoming in Journal of Public Economics.
Ishida, J, and N., Matsushima, 2008b, ``Outward FDI in Unionized Oligopoly: Welfare and Policy Implications," Osaka University, OSIPP Discussion Paper DP-2008-E-005.
Lambertini, L, 1997, ``Prisoners' Dilemma in Duopoly (Super)Games," Journal of Economic Theory, 77, 181-191.
Leahy, D, and C, Montagna, 2000, ``Unionisation and Foreign Direct Investment: Challenging Conventional Wisdom?" Economic Journal, 110, C80-C92.
Lommerud K, E., F, Meland, and L, Sorgard 2003,``Unionised Oligopoly, Trade Liberalisation and Location Choice," Economic Journal, 113, 782-800.
Lopez, C, M, 2007, ``Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly with Upstream Suppliers," Jouranl of Economics and Management Strategy, 16, 469-505.
Lopez, C, M, and R, Naylor, 2004, ``The Cournot-Bertrand Profit Differential: A Reversal Result in a Dfferentiated Duopoly with Wage Bargaining," European Economic Review, 48, 681-696.
Lu, Y. and S., Poddar, 2006, ``The Choice of Capacity in Mixed Duopoly under Demand Uncertainty," The Manchester School, 74, 266-272.
Manasakis, C, and M, Vlassis, 2006, ``Equilibrium Mode of Competition in Unionize Oligopolies: Do Unions Act as Commitment Device to Cournot Outcomes," Working Papers No. 2006-3, University of Crete.
Matsumura. T, 1998, ``Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly," Journal of Public Economics, 70, 473-483.
Matsumura, T, and O, Kanda, 2005,``Mixed Oligopoly at Free Entry Markets," Journal of Economics, 84, 27-48.
Matsumura, T., and N. Matsushima, 2004, ``Endogenous Cost Differentials between Public and Private Enterprises: A Mixed Duopoly Approach," Economica, 71, 671-688.
Matsushima, N, and T, Matsumura, 2006,``Mixed Oligopoly and Spatial Agglomeration," Canadian Journal of Economics, 36, 62-87.
Mukherjee, A, and K, Suetrong, 2007,``Unionisation Structure and Strategic Foreign Direct Investment," GEP Research Paper Series 2007/22, University of Nottingham.
Naylor, R, A, 2002,``Industry Profits and Competition under Bilateral Oligopoly," Economics Letters, 77, 169-177.
Naylor, R, A, 1998,``International Trade and Economic Integration when Labour Markets are Generally Unionised," European Economic Review, 42, 1251-1267.
Naylor, R, A, 1999,``Wage Union Strategies and International Trade," Economic Journal, 109, 102-125.
Nett, L., 1993, ``Mixed Oligopoly with Homogeneous Goods," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 64, 367-393.
Okuguchi, K., 1987, ``Equilibrium Prices in the Bertrand and Cournot Oligopolies," Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 213-229.
Oswald, A, J., and P., Turnbull, 1995, ``Pay and Employment Determination in Britain: What are Labour Contracts Really Like," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1, 80-97.
Qiu, L, D. 1997, ``On the Dynamic Efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot Equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, 75, 213-229.
Schmidt, K, M., 1996, ``The Costs and Benefits of Privatization - An Incomplete Contracts Approach," Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 12, 1-24.
Singh, N., and Vives, X., 1984, ``Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, 15, 546-554.
Skaksen, M, Y,, and J. R. Sorensen, 2001, ``Should Trade Union Appreciate Foreign Direct Investment?" Journal of International Economics, 55, 379-390.
Straume, O. R., 2003, ``International Merger and Trade Liberalization: Implications for Unionized Labour," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 717-735.
Zanchettin, P., 2006, ``Differentiated Duopoly with Asymmetirc Costs: New Results from a Seminal Model," Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15, 999-1015.
Zhao, L., 1995, ``Cross-Hauling Direct Foreign Investment and Unionized Oligopoly," European Economic Review, 39, 379-390.
Wang, X. H, 2008, ``Price and Quantity Competition Revisited," Economics Bulletin, 4, 1-7.