Roumasset, James (1978): The new institutional economics and agricultural organization. Published in: The Philippine Economic Journal , Vol. 17, No. 3 (1978): pp. 331-348.
Download (60kB) | Preview
The institutional economics if John Commons (1934) contained two related objectives. The first was to explain the evolution of economics. The second was to analyze the effects of institutions on resource allocation and the distribution of income. The method of explaining the evolution of institutions was historical. In explaining resource allocation, Commons used institutional considerations such as interest groups and bargaining power largely as an alternative to neoclassical economics. Common’s brand of institutional economics has been practically extinct in the evolution of economic methodology. The reason for this is that historical explanations tend to be arbitrary and fail to identify alternative causes of change. At the time, “institutional” explanations of economic events and patterns tend to be ad hoc and irrefutable A body of literature has now been developed from somewhat diverse sources, however, which may provide a new paradigm for achieving Common’s objectives. Without claim to originality, we call this paradigm the new institutional economics. In explaining the existence and evolution of institutions, the new institutional economics uses conventional economic tools such as benefits, costs, and equilibrium. In explaining resource allocation and income distribution, the new approach uses institutions in conjunction with rather than as an alternative to neoclassical theory.
One of the primary concerns of the new institutional economics is explaining nonmarket resource allocation. This is an especially important area of research for helping to describe the organization of agriculture in developing countries. Since the cost of market operation is characterized by economies of scale, markets for agricultural products in isolated regions of developing countries are often poorly developed or nonexistent. Factors of production are often contracted for by nonmarket devices. Similarly, agricultural products are typically disposed of (e.g., for and by an individual household). It is therefore important for understanding the prospects and potential for agricultural development to improve both our empirical and theoretical knowledge of these institutional arrangements.
The purpose of the present paper is to provide a methodology for investigating institutional arrangements in agriculture and to illustrate the methodology by explaining selected patterns in agricultural contracts. The paper is organized as follows. In section I, we review the literature which makes up the new institutional economics. By integrating and extending the literature, a new method for explaining the organization of production emerges. This methodology is developed and described in section II. In section III, certain stylized facts about agricultural organization are presented, developed and explained using the principles discussed in section II.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The new institutional economics and agricultural organization|
|Keywords:||new institutional economics|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth
D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy
|Depositing User:||James Roumasset|
|Date Deposited:||22. Mar 2010 00:28|
|Last Modified:||05. Mar 2015 17:30|
Alchain, A. A., and Demsetz, H. “Production Information Costs and Economic Organization,” The American Economic Review 62. (1972): 777-795.
Arrow, K. J. “The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market versus Non-Market Allocation,” The Analysis and Evaluation of Public Expenditures: The PPB System, U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,1969, 47-64.
------. The Limits of Organization. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1974. Baumol, W. J. and Bradford, D. E. “Optimal Departures from Marginal CostPricing,” The American Economic Review (1970): 165-183.
Bernal-Torres, F., and Sandoval, P. R. “Landlord Participation in the Farm Business,” The Philippine Agriculturalist 51 (1967): 65-76.
Borcherding, T. E., and Silberberg, E. “Shipping the Good Apples Out: The Alchain and Allen Theorem Reconsidered,” The Journal of PoliticalEconomy 86 (1978): 131-38.
Commons, J. R. Institutional Economics, Vol. 1. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1934.
Davis, L. E., and North, D. C. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, London: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
Demsetz, H. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 57 (1967): 347-73.
------. “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint,” The Journal of Law and Economics (1969): 1-22.
------. “When does the Rule of Liability Matter?” The Journal of Legal Studies, (1972): 13-28. Dolan, E. G. Microeconomics. Illinois: The Dryden Press, 1977.
Friedman, M. “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” In Essays in Positive Economics, edited by Milton Friedman, pp. 3-43. Chicago: University of Chic ago Press, 1935.
Geertz, C. Peddlers and Princes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.
------. The Social History of an Indonesian Town. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1965.
Hayami, Y. “Asian Village-Community Research: Issue and Approach,” International Rice Research Institute Workshop in Village Level Studies, 1978a.
------. Anatomy of a Peasant Economy, forthcoming, 1978b.
------, and Ruttan, V. W. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.
Heady, E.O. “Economics of Farm Leasing Systems,” The Journal of Farm Economics, (1947).
Herdt, R. W. and Barker, R. “Multi-Site Tests Environments and Breeding Strategies for New Rice Technology,” International Rice Research Institute Paper Series, No. 7, 1977.
Herdt, R. W. and Ranade, C. G. “The Impact of New Rice Technology on the Shares of Farm Earnings: Laguna and Central Luzon, Philippines,” Agricultural Economics Department, International Rice Research Institute, 1976.
Kessinger, T. G. Vilyatpur, 1848-1968: Social and Economic Change in a North Indian Village. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.
Kikuchi, M.; Bambo, L. M.; and Hayami, Y. “Evolution of Land Tenure System in a Laguna Village,” Agricultural Economics Department Paper No. 77-11, International Rice Research Institute, 1977.
------. Fortuna, N; Bambo, L. M.; and Hayami, Y. “Polarization of a LagunaVillage,” Project “Dynamics of an Agrarian Change” Report No. 2, International Rice Research Institute, 1978.
Lewis, H. T. Ilocano Rice farmers: A Comparative Study of Two Philippine Barrios. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1971.
Mangahas, M.; Miralao, V. A.; and de los Reyes, R. P. Tenants, Lessees and Owners: Welfare Implications of Tenure Change, Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 1976.
Mirrlees, J. A. “An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation,” Review of Economic Studies 38 (1971).
Ranade, C. “Distribution of Benefits from New Agricultural Technologies: A Study at the Farm Level,” Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, 1977.
Roumasset, J. A., “Induced Institutional Change, Welfare Economics, and the Science of Public Policy,” Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Californ ia, Davis, 1974.
------. Rice and Risk (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company).
------, and James, W. “Explaining Patterns in Agricultural Contracts,” Institute of Agricultural Development and Administration, Paper No. 78-3, University of the Philippines, Los Baños.
Rudra, A. “Share -cropping Arrangements in West Bengal,” Review of Agriculture (1975): A58-A63.
Samuelson, P. A. “Evolution of Real National Income,” Oxford Economic Papers, n.s. 2 (1950): 1-29. Schickele, R. Journal of Farm Economics 23 (1941): 185-207.
Spence, A. M. “The Economics of Internal Organization: An Introduction,” The Bell Journal of Economics 6 (1975): 163-72.
Stiglitz, J. E. Review of Economic Studies 41 (1974): 219-56.
Takahashi, A. Land and Peseants in Central Luzon; Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, 1969.
Williamson, O. E. “Firms and Markets,” In Modern Economic Thought, edited by S. Weintraub. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977.
Yotopoulos, P.; Lau, L.; & Somel, K. “Labor Intensity and Relative Efficiency in Indian Agriculture,” Food Research Institute Studies 9 (1970): 43-55.
Yotopoulos, P, and Nugent, J. Economics of Development. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1976.