Mishra, SK (2006): Globalization and Structural Changes in the Indian Industrial Sector: An Analysis of Production Functions.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_1333.pdf Download (364kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In 1991 India chose to open her economy and formulated the New Economic Policy (NEP). Under the structural adjustment and reform programmes, the NEP aimed at promoting growth by eliminating supply bottlenecks that hinder competitiveness, efficiency and dynamism in the economic system
This study investigates into the structural changes in the manufacturing sector of India brought about by liberalization and globalization of the economy. Structural changes in terms of employment of labour and capital, indicated by replacement of the former by the latter, and changes in returns-to-scale have been examined by estimating CES, Zellner-Revankar, Transcendental, Diewert and Bruno's production functions. State-wise data for 1990-91 and 2003-04 have been analyzed.
The findings have indicated that the rise in industrial output during the reference period is accountable to substitution of capital for labour in almost all states. The elasticity of substitution has declined for most of the states. In the pre-globalization period the industries experienced increasing returns to scale. Globalization has given way to diminishing returns to scale. Along with a rise in industrial output, globalization has led to a decline in regional disparities in terms of population-deflated indices of employment of manpower and capital, and the resultant output.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong (India) |
Original Title: | Globalization and Structural Changes in the Indian Industrial Sector: An Analysis of Production Functions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | India; Manufacturing sector; industry; globalization; liberalization; production function; returns to scale; variable elasticity of substitution; Bruno's production function; labour; capital; Zellner-Revankar; CES; VES; CMS; Transcendental; Diewert; nonlinear; optimization; Differential evolution; LAD; Least Absolute Deviation estimation |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O47 - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth ; Aggregate Productivity ; Cross-Country Output Convergence D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L60 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes |
Item ID: | 1333 |
Depositing User: | Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra |
Date Deposited: | 06 Jan 2007 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 06:53 |
References: | · Balakrishnan, P., Pushpangadan, K. and Babu, M.S.(2002) “Trade Liberalization, Market Power and Scale Efficiency in Indian Industry”, CDS Working Paper-336, www.cds.edu · Bruno, M. (1968) “Estimation of Factor Contribution to Growth under Structural Disequilibrium”, International Economic Review, 9, pp. 49-62. · Chand, S. and Sen, K.(2002) “Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Indian Manufacturing”, Review of Development Economics, 6(1), pp. 120-132. · Dasgupta, M. and Mishra, S.K.(2004) "Least Absolute Deviation Estimation of Linear Econometric Models: A Literature Review". SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=552502. · Diewert, W.E.(1971) "An Application of the Shephard Duality Theorem: A Generalized Leontief Production Function," Journal of Political Economy, 79(3), pp. 481-507. · Driffield, N.L. and Khambhampati, U.S.(2003) “Trade Liberalization and the Efficiency of Firms in Indian Manufacturing”, Review of Development Economics, 7(3), pp. 419-430. · Dutt, A.K. and Rao, J.M. (2000) “Globalization and its Social Discontents: The Case of India”, Working Paper No. 16, CEPA Working Paper Series I: Globalization, Labor Markets, and Social Policy. Center for Economic Policy Analysis, New School University, New York. · Eberhart R.C. and Kennedy J.(1995) “A New Optimizer using Particle Swarm Theory”, Proceedings Sixth Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, pp. 39–43. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ. · Fair, R.C. (1974) "On Robust Estimation of Econometric Models", Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 3, pp. 667-678. · Felipe, J. and Fisher, F.M. (2001) "Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know", Metroeconomica, 54, pp. 208-262. Reprint available at Social Science Research Network (SSRN) http://ssrn.com/abstract=422067. · Glover F. (1986) "Future paths for Integer Programming and Links to Artificial Intelligence", Computers and Operations Research, 5: pp. 533-549. · Hensman, R. (2001) “The Impact of Globalisation on Employment in India and Responses from the Formal and Informal Sectors” IIAS/IISG, CLARA Working Paper, No. 15, Amsterdam, 2001. · Holland, J.(1975) Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. · Kalirajan, K. and Bhide, S.(2004) “The Post-reform Performance of the Manufacturing Sector in India”, Asian Economic Papers, 3(2), pp. 126-157. · Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D. Jr., and Vecchi, M.P.(1983) "Optimization by Simulated Annealing", Science, 220, 4598, pp. 671-680. · Kundu, A (1997). “Trends and Structure of Employment in the 1990s. Implications for Urban Growth”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 14, 1399-1405. · Lall, S., Shalizi, Z. and Deichmann, U.(2001) “Agglomeration Economies and Productivity in Indian Industry”, Social Science Research Network, http://ssrn.com/abstract=632732. · Mishra, SK.(2006-a) "Global Optimization by Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Methods: Evaluation on Some Benchmark Functions", Social Science Research Network, http://ssrn.com/abstract=933827. · Mishra, S. K.(2006-b) "A Note on Numerical Estimation of Sato's Two-Level CES Production Function" SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=947307. · Mishra, S.K.(2006-c) “Estimation of Zellner-Revankar Production Function Revisited”, Social Science Research Network, http://ssrn.com/abstract=950731. · Nath, H.K.(1996) “Relative Efficiency of Modern Small Scale Industries in India : An Inter-State Comparison” (unpub) M. Phil. dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. · Nikaido, Y.(2004) “Technical Efficiency of Small-Scale Industry: Application of Stochastic Production Frontier Model”, Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 592-597, Feb. 7. · Robinson, J. (1953) “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital”, The Review of Economic Studies, 21, pp. 81-106. · Sankar, U. (1970) “Elasticities of Substitution and Returns to Scale in Indian Manufacturing Industries”, International Economic Review, 11(3), pp. 399-411. · Saptari, R. (2001) “The Impact of Globalization on Employment in India and Responses from the Formal and Informal Sectors”, Seminar of CLARA fellow: Rohini Hensman, Bombay. · Sato, R. (1970) “The Estimation of Biased Technical Progress and the Production Function”, International Economic Review, 11, pp. 179-208. · Schlossmacher, E.J. (1973) "An Alternative Technique for Absolute Deviations Curve Fitting", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, pp. 857-859. · Shaikh, A. (1974) "Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(1), pp. 115-120. Reprint available at the website http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/humbug.pdf · Shaikh, A. (1980) "Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra—Humbug II", in Growth, Profits and Property (ed.) Nell. E.J., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Reprint available at the website http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/humbug2.pdf. · Storn, R. and Price, K. (1995) "Differential Evolution - A Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces": Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkley. · Taylor, L.D.(1974) “Estimation by Minimizing the Sum of Absolute Errors”, in Zarembka, P. (Ed) Frontiers of Econometrics, Academic Press, New York. · Törn, A.A.(1978) “A Search Clustering Approach to Global Optimization” , in Dixon, LCW and Szegö, G.P. (Eds) Towards Global Optimization – 2, North Holland, Amsterdam. · Williams, M. and Laumas, P.S.(1984) “Economies of Scale for Various Types of Manufacturing Production Technologies in an Underdeveloped Economy”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32(2), pp. 401-412. · Zellner, A. and Revankar, N.S.(1969) “Generalized Production Functions”, The Review of Economic Studies, 36(2), pp. 241-250. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/1333 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Globalization and Structural Changes in the Indian Industrial Sector: An Analysis of Production Functions. (deposited 22 Dec 2006)
- Globalization and Structural Changes in the Indian Industrial Sector: An Analysis of Production Functions. (deposited 06 Jan 2007) [Currently Displayed]