Hills, Roderick (2009): Federalism and Public Choice. Forthcoming in: Law and Public Choice (2009)
Download (305kB) | Preview
This paper is a draft chapter for an edited collection on Law and Public Choice being published by Edward Elgar and edited by Dan Farber and Anne Joseph O’Connell. The chapter provides an overview of public choice literature regarding three aspects of federalism - exit-based normative justifications for federal regimes, voice-based normative justifications for federal regimes, and positive theories for how federal regimes are sustained through the political process. In general, I suggest that the most promising trend in public choice theory is the effort of economists, political scientists, and lawyers to tackle the thorny question of “voice” in federal regimes - that is, how subnational politics differs in federal regimes from the politics of unitary states. Moreover, the case for federalism based on exit critically depends on the argument for federalism based on improvement of ”voice.” Otherwise, migration from one city or state to another to escape predatory regimes would simply be pointless movement out of a ”Leviathan” frying pan into a ”Leviathan” fire. Public choice theorists seem to have an inveterate suspicion of claims that subnational government facilitates political participation, perhaps because the entire tradition of public choice is based on the theoretical impossibility that collective action can accurately represent individuals’ preferences and values. Yet nothing in the conventional account of how decentralization improves political ”voice” is inconsistent with the abstract principles of public choice theory.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Federalism and Public Choice|
|English Title:||Federalism and Public Choice|
|Keywords:||Public Choice; federalism; political process; predatory regimes; Leviathan; collective action;|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General
|Depositing User:||Roderick Hills|
|Date Deposited:||26. Feb 2009 04:59|
|Last Modified:||08. Jan 2014 07:17|
Aberbach, Joel D., Robert D. Putnam & Bert A. Rockman (1982), Bureaucrats and Politicians in
Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Abramson, Paul R.,John H. Aldrich & David W. Rohde (1987), ‘Progressive Ambition Among
United States Senators: 1972-1988,’ Journal of Politics 49
Aldrich, John H. (1997), ‘When Is It Rational To Vote?’, in Dennis C. Mueller, ed, Perspectives on
Public Choice: A Handbook, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 373-90
Aldrich, John H. (1995), Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in
America, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Alesina, Alberto, Reza Baqir, and William Easterly, (2000), ‘Redistributive Public Employment,’
Journal of Urban Economics, 48(2), 219-241.
Bardhan, and D. Mookherjee (2000), ‘Capture and Governance at Local and National
Levels,’American Economic Review, 90(2), 135-39.
Baqir, Reza (2002), ‘Districting and Overspending,’Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1318-
Bednar, Jenna, William Eskridge and John Ferejohn (2001), ‘A Political Theory of Federalism’, in
Ferejohn, John A., Jack N. Rakove, and Jonathan Riley (eds.), Constitutional Culture and
Democratic Rule , Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Been, Vicki (1995), ‘Exit as a Constraint on Land Use Exactions,’ Columbia Law Review, 95(), 473-
Berry, Jeffrey M. (1998), ‘The Rise of Citizen Groups,’ in Theda Skocpol & Morris P. Fiorina eds.,
Civic Engagement in American Democracy, Brookings Institution Press, 367-94.
Besley, Timothy and Susan Coate (2003), ‘Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public
goods: a political economy approach,’ Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2611-2637.
Besley, Timothy and Stephen Coate (2000), Elected versus Appointed Regulators: Theory and
Evidence, NBER Working Paper 8036.
Besley, Timothy & Anne Case (1995), ‘Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and
Yardstick Competition,’ American Economic Review, 85(1), 25-45.
Bishop, Bill and Robert Cushing (2008), The Big Sort: Why The Clustering of Like-Minded
America is Tearing Us Apart, New York, NY: Houghton, Mifflin.
Bowen, Howard (1943), 'The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of. Economic Resources',
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 58(), 27-48
Bratton,William, and Joseph McCahery (1997), ‘The new economics of jurisdictional competition:
Devolutionary federalism in a second-best world’, Georgetown Law Journal 86, 201–278.
Brennan, Geoffrey and James Buchanan (1980), The Power to Tax: Analytic Foundations of a Fiscal
Constitution, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc.
Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina (1987), The Personal Vote: Constituency Service
and Electoral Independence, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Calhoun, John C. (1851, 2007), Disquisition on Government, South Bend, IL: St. Augustines Press.
Caplan, Bryan (2001), ‘When is Two Better Than One? How Federalism Mitigates and Intensifies
Imperfect Political Competition,’ Journal of Public Economics, vol. 80(1), 99-119.
Clark, Bradford R. (2001), ‘Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Federalism,’ Texas Law. Review, 79(), 1321
Choper, Jesse (1980), Judicial Review and the National Political Process, Chicago, IL: Univerwsity
Dahl, Robert & Edward Tufte (1973), Size and Democracy, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University
Elazar, Daniel (1973), ‘Cursed by Bigness: Toward a Post -Technocratic Federalism’ in Daniel
Elazar, ed., The Federal Polity, 272
Donahue, John. 1997. Tiebout? Or not Tiebout? The market metaphor and America’s devolution
debate. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4), 73-82.
Dowding, Keith & K., P. John y S. Biggs (1994), ‘Tiebout: A Survey of the Empirical Literature’,
Urban Studies, 31(4-5) 767-797.
Ellickson, Robert (1982), ‘Cities and homeowners associations’ University of Pennsylvania Law
Review 130(), 1519–1580.
Engel, Kirsten H. (1997), ‘State environmental setting: Is there a “race” and is it “to the bottom”?’
Hastings Law Journal, 48(), 271–398.
Eskridge, William N. (2008), ‘Vetogates, Chevron, Preemption,’ Notre Dame Law Review, 83(4),
Farber, Daniel A. and Philip P. Frickey (1991), Law and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction,
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Feeley, Malcolm M. & Edward Rubin (2008), Federalism: Political Identity and Tragic Compromise
, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Fiorina, Morris Fiorina (2d ed. 2006), Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, New York,
NY: Pearson Longman.
Fields, Joseph A. Fields, Linda S. Klein, and James M. Sfiridis, ‘A Market Based Evaluation of the
Election versus Appointment of Regulatory Commissioners,’ Public Choice, 92(), 337
Fischel, William A. (2001), The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local
Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Flatters, Frank, Henry Henderson, & Peter Mieszkowski (1974), ‘Public Goods, Efficiency, and
Regional Fiscal Equalization’, Journal of Public Economics 3(2) pp. 99-112.
Formby, John P., Banamber Mishra, and Paul D. Thistle (1995), ‘Public Utility Regulation and Bond
Ratings,’ Public. Choice 84(), 119
Galle, Brian and Joseph Leahy (forthcoming 2009), ‘Laboratories of Democracy? Policy Innovation
in Decentralized Governments’, Emory Law Journal
Gierzynski, Anthony and David Breaux (1996), ‘Legislative Elections and the Importance of
Money,’ Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21(Aug), 337-57.
Gillette, Clayton P (2000), ‘The Exercise of Trumps by Decentralized Government’, Virginia.Law
Review, 83(), 1347-1417.
Glaeser, Edward L. and Andrei Schleifer (2005), ‘The Curley Effect: The Economics of Shaping the
Electorate,’ Journal of Law and Economics, 21(1), 1-19.
Goldstein, Kenneth M. (1999), Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Participation in America, Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gordon, Roger (1992), ‘Can capital income taxes survive in open economies?’, Journal of Finance
Green, Donald P. & Ian Shapiro (1994), Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory, New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Hamm, Richard (1995), Shaping the 18th Amendment: Temperance Reform, Legal Culture, and the
Polity, 1880-1920, Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press.
Hills, Roderick M. (2007), ‘Compared to What? Tiebout and the Comparative Merits of Congress
and the States in Constitutional Federalism’, in Fischel, William (ed.), The Tiebout Model at Fifty:
Essays in Public Economics in Honor of Wallace Oates, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land
Policy, pp. 239-63.
Hirschman, Albert O. (1970), Exit, Voice, and Loyalty, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hogan, Robert E. (2001), ‘War Chests and Challenger Emergence in State Legislative Elections,’
Political Research Quarterly, 54(), 815
Hogan, Robert E. and Keith E. Hamm (1998), ‘Variations in District-Level Campaign Spending in
State Legislatures, in Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections,’ in Joel A. Thompson and
Gary E Moncrief, eds., Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, Washington, D.C.:
Congressional Quarterly Press.
Inman, Robert P. (2008), ‘The value of Federalism and Federalism’s Value,’ CESifo Economic
S t u d i e s , 2 0 0 8 , d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 9 3 / c e s i f o / i f m 0 1 8
Inman, Robert P. and Micheal Fitts (1990), ‘Political institutions and fiscal policy: Evidence from
the historical record,’ Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 6, 79-132.
Inman, Robert P. and Daniel Rubinfeld (1996), ‘Designing Tax Policy in Federalist Economies: An
Overview’, Journal of Public Economics, 60(3), 307-334.
Inman, Robert P. and Daniel Rubinfeld, (1997), ‘Rethinking Federalism,’ The Journal of. Economic
Perspectives, 11(4), 43-64.
Key, V.O., Jr. (1950), Southern Politics in State and Nation, Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee
Kollman, Ken (1998), Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies, Princeton,
NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kramer, Larry D. (2000), “Putting the Politics Back into the Political Safeguards of Federalism,” 100
Columbia Law Review 100(), 215
Kuga, Kiyoshi and Hirooki Nagatani (1974), ‘Voter Antagonism and the Paradox of Voting,’
Econometrica, 42 (6), 1045-1067.
Larsen, Clifford (1999), ‘States Federal, Fi nancial, Sovereign, and Social: A Critical Inquiry into
an Alternative to American Financial Federalism’, American Journal of Comparative Law 47(Summer), 429-88. Levinson, Daryl (2005), ‘Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law,’ Harvard Law
Review 118 (), 915
Lijphart, Arend (1968), ‘The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the
Netherlands’, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Lockwood, Benjamin (2006), ‘The Political Economy of Decentralization’, in Ehtisham Ahmad &
Giorgio Brosio eds., Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 33-60.
Lockwood, Benjamin (2002), ‘Distributive Politics and the Costs of Centralization,’ Review of .
Economic Studies, 69(2), 313-337.
McConnell, Grant (1967), Private Power and American Democracy, New York, NY: Alfred A.
Macey, Jonathan (1990), ‘Federal Deference to Local Regulators and the Economic Theory of
Regulation: Towards a Public-Choice Explanation of Federalism,’ Virginia Law Review, 76(), 265-
Mingat, Alain and Pierre Salmon (1982), ‘Alterable Electorates in the Context of Residential
Mobility,’ Public Choice 59(1), 67-82.
Molotch, Harvey (1976), ‘The City as Growth Machine: Towards a Political Economy of Place,’
American Journal of Sociology Vol. 82(2), 309-332.
Mueller, Dennis C (1997), ‘Public Choice in Perspective’, in Mueller, Dennis C., Perspectives on
Public Choice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1-17.
Oates,Wallace E. (1969), ‘Effects of property taxes and local spending on property values: An
empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis’, Journal of Political
Oates, Wallace (1991), ‘An Essay on Fiscal Federalism’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3),
Oliver, J. Eric (2001), Democracy in Suburbia, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Olson, Mancur (1969), ‘The Principle of Fiscal Equivalence: The Division of Responsiblities among
Different Levels of Government’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 59(2), pp.
Ostrom, Elinor and Gordon Whittaker (1999), ‘Does Local Community Control of Police Make a
Difference?’ in Michael Dean McGinnis, ed., Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings
from the Workshop of Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan
Peterson, Paul (1995), The Price of Federalism, Washington , D.C.: Brookings Institute.
Revesz, Richard L. (2001), ‘Federalism and Environmental Regulation: A Public Choice Analysis,’
Harvard Law Review, 115(),. 553-641.
Revesz, Richard L. (1992), ‘Rehabilitating interstate competition: Rethinking the race-to-the-
bottom” rationale for federal environmental regulation’, New York University Law Review 67(),
Riker, William H. (1964), Federalism: Origina, Operation, Significance, Boston, MA: Little, Brown
Rodden, Jonathan (2003), ‘Reviving Leviathan: Fiscal Federalism and the Growth of Government’,
International Organization, 57(4), 695-729.
Rohde, David W. (1979), ‘Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the
United States House of Representatives,’ American Journal of Political Science, 23 .
Rose-Ackerman, Susan and Jonathan Rodden (1997), ‘Does Federalism Preserve Markets?’83(7), 1521-1572.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan (1980), ‘Risk Taking and Reelection: Does Federalism Promote
Innovation?’, Journal of Legal Studies 9(June), 593-616 (1980).
Rosenstone, Steven J. and John Mark Hansen (1993), Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy
in America, New York, NY: Pearson, Longman.
Salmon, Pierre (2006), ‘Horizontal Competition Among Governments’ in Ehtisham Ahmad &
Giorgio Brosio eds., Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 61-85.
Samuelson, Paul (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure,’ 36 Review Economics &
Statistics 36(4): 37-39.
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1988), ‘The Joint-decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European
Integration,’ Public Administration 66, 239-278.
Schattschneider, E.E. (1960, reissued 1988), The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of
Democracy in America. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
Schleicher, David (2007), ‘Why is There No Partisan Competition in City Council Elections? The
Role of Election Law,’ Journal of Law & Politics 15, 419-73.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (3d ed. 1953), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Princeton, N.J.:
Princeton University Press.
Sharma, Chanchal Kumar (2006), ‘Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring the Degree and Evaluating
the Outcomes’,Indian Journal of Political Science 67(1), 49-64.
Stone, Clarence (1991), Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KS: University
of Kansas Press.
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956), ‘A pure theory of local expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy
Tolley, George (1974), ‘The Welfare Economics of City Bigness’, Journal of Urban Economics,
Treisman, Daniel, (2002), ‘The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study,’ Journal of Public
Economics, 76(3) 399-457.
Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady (1994), Voice and Equality: Civic
Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wechsler, Herbert (1954), ‘The Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Rôle of the States in the
Composition and Selection of the National Government,’ Columbia Law Review, 54() 543
Weingast, Barry R. (1995), ‘The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving
Federalism and Economic Development,’ Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11(1) 1-31.
Weingast, Barry Weingast & Kenneth Shepsle (1981), ‘Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A
Generalization,’ American Political Science Review, 25, 96-111.
Weingast, Barry (1979), ‘A rational choice perspective on congressional norms,’ American Political
Science Review 23(2), 245-262.
Wellisch, Dietmar (2000), A Theory of Public Finance in a Federal State, Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
Ralph K. Winter, Jr., (1977), State Law, Shareholder Protection, and the Theory of the Corporation,
Journal of Legal Studies, 6(), 251
Wildasin, David (1989), ‘Interjurisdictional capital mobility: Fiscal externality and a corrective
subsidy,’ Journal of Urban Economics 25(), 193-212.
Wittman, Donald (1989), ‘Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results,’ Journal of Political
Economy, 97(6), 1395-1424