The European Neighborhood policy: towards a new EU-MED partnership?

Montalbano, Pierluigi (2006): The European Neighborhood policy: towards a new EU-MED partnership? Published in: EIU WP Law , Vol. 21, (2007): pp. 45-64.

Abstract

The aim of the present work is to test empirically the feasibility of the broad expectations regarding the effects of ENP on the EU-MED economic partnership. More specifically, it presents firstly a gravity analysis of the patterns of trade in the EU-MED area to test the actual dimension of unexploited trade as well as the level of trade potentials after the ENP and the EU-MED FTA will take place. Secondly, it analyzes the relative degree of macroeconomic instability in the region by checking the patterns of volatility of per capita consumption in the EU-MED partner countries. The gravity estimates show the existence of a large amount of unexploited trade in the context of the EU-MED partnership but a slow pace of exports’ growth performance driven by ENP and EU-MED FTA project, even in the most “optimistic” scenario. The analysis of volatility highlights the MPs low ability to maintain a stable path of consumption. Thus, MPs remain more exposed to the occurrence of the external negative covariate shocks, associated with trade liberalization, with a strong probability of long term negative effects in aggregate welfare, even in a context of positive growth. According to these first results, ENP seems to be unfit to promote further integration and liberalization in the area as well as the “stake in the internal market” for MPs. It undermines a number of key issues and collateral policies which remain fundamental for the success of the EU-MED integration process, such as the role of regional South-South integration and the adoption of early warning mechanisms and preventive policies to reduce the probability of negative shocks induced by trade liberalization.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: European Neighborhood Policy, EU MED Partnership, Gravity Model, International Trade, Macro Volatility
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E00 - General

References

Agénor, P. R., C. McDermott, E. Prasad (2000). “Macroeconomic Fluctuations in Developing Countries.” World Bank Economic Review 14 :251--85.

Aizenman, J. and B. Pinto (2004), ‘Managing Volatility and Crises: A Practitioner’s Guide Overview, Draft Chapter’, in World Bank (ed), Managing Volatility and Crises: A Practitioner’s Guide, PREM Economic Policy, Managing Volatility Thematic Group.

Anderson J.E. and van Wincoop E. (2003) Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle, American Economic Review, 93, 1, 170–192;

Baldwin R.E. (1994), Towards an Integrated Europe, CEPR, London;

Barro, Sala-i-Martin (1995), Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, Inv. Advanced Series in Economics;

Baltagi (2001), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Second Edition, New York;

Bergstrand J. H. (1985), The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence, Review of Economic Statistics, 67;

Bertola, G. and R. J. Caballero (1994), ‘Cross Sectional Efficiency and Labor Hoarding in an Matching Model of Unemployment’, NBER Working Papers, 4472;

Buigues P., Martinez-Mongay C. (2000), Trade Resistance and Global Competitiveness: The Cases of Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia, paper presented at the 7th Annual Conference of the Economic Research Forum, Amman, 26-29 October;

Caballero, R. J. (2000), ‘Macroeconomic Volatility in Latin America: A View and Three Case Studies’, Economia, 1(1), 31–108;

Collins S., Rodrik D. (1991), Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in the World Economy, Institute for International Economics, Washington DC;

De Benedictis L. and Vicarelli C. (2005), Trade Potentials in Gravity Panel Data Models, Topics in Economic Analysis & Policy, Volume 5, Issue 1 2005 Article 20;

Deardoff A. (1997), “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity work in a Classical Word?”, The Regionalisation of the World Economy, ed.Frankel J., University of Chicago Press;

Del Sarto, R. A.; Schumacher T. (2005), From EMP to ENP : what's at stake with the European neighbourhood policy towards the southern Mediterranean?; European Foreign Affairs Review, v. 10, n. 1, Spring, p. [17]-38;

Dercon S. (2001), ‘Assessing vulnerability’, World Bank working paper, August;

Easterly W. R., R. Islam and J.E. Stiglitz (2001), ‘Shaken and Stirred: Explaining Growth Volatility’, The World Bank Annual Conference on Economic Development, Washington DC;

Egger P. (2002) An Econometric View on Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potential, The World Economy, 25, 2, 297–312;

Emerson (2004) European Neighbourhood Policy: Strategy or Placebo?, Centre for European Policy Studies, n. 215, November;

European Commission (2007), Directorate-General For Economic and Financial Affairs, Interim forecast, February;

Evenett S. and Keller W. (2002) On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Model, Journal of Political Economy, 110, 281–316;

Feenstra R.C. (2004) Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, ch.3;

Femise (2005), Report on the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership;

Femise (2006), Report on the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership;

Ferragina A., Giovanetti G. and Pastore F. (2005), EU Actual and Potential Trade witht Mediterranean and Central and Eastern European Countries. A Gravity Study, paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the Economic Research Forum (ERF);

Fidrmuc J. and Fidrmuc J. (2000), Integration, Disintegration and Trade in Europe: Evolution of Trade relations during the 1990's, Centre for European Integration Studies, Universität Bonn, Working Paper, B3;

Frankel J. (1997), Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System, Institute for International Economics, Washington;

Head K., Mayer T. (1998), Non-Europe: The Magnitude and Causes of Market Fragmentation in the EU, CEPR;

Helpman E., Krugman P.R.(1985), Market structure and Foreign Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge MA;

Hnatkoska, V. and N. Loayza (2004), ‘Volatility and Growth’, in World Bank (ed), Managing Volatility and Crises: A Practitioner’s Guide, PREM Economic Policy, Managing Volatility Thematic Group;

Kose, M. Ayhan, and K. Yi (2003), ‘The Trade-Comovement Problem in International Macroeconomics’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Reports, 155;

Kose, M.A. (2002), ‘Explaining business cycles in small open economies’, Journal of International Economics, 56, 299–327;

Leamer E. (1997), “Access to Western Markets, and Eastern Effort Levels”, in S. Zecchini, ed. Lessons from the Economic Transition: Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s, Dordrecht; Boston¸Kluwer Academic Publishers;

Martin, P. and C.A. Rogers (1997), ‘Stabilization policy, learning-by-doing and economic growth’, Oxford Economic Papers, 49 (1), 152–166;

Milcher S. (2007), The Economic Rational of the European Neighborhood Policy (mimeo);

Montalbano (2003), “Analisi dei Flussi Potenziali di Interscambio Commerciale nel Mercato Comune Paneuropeo”, PAGRI - 2/2003;

Montalbano (2004), L’approccio di gravità: un modello eclettico di economia internazionale, Dipartimento di Teoria Economica e Metodi Quantitativi per le Scelte Politiche, Quaderno n. 28;

Montalbano P. et al. (2006), “Trade Openness and Vulnerability in Central and Eastern Europe” in Machiko Nissanke and Erik Thorbecke (eds) The Impact of Globalization on the World’s Poor: Transmission Mechanisms; Palgrave;

Nenci S. (2003), “Il ruolo delle riforme nei processi di integrazione regionale: il caso dei PECO” , PAGRI - 2/2003, 61-76;

Pallage, S. and M.A. Robe (2003), ‘On the Welfare Cost of Economic Fluctuations in Developing Countries’, International Economic Review, 44 (2), 677–698;

Prasad, E.S and A.J. Gable (1997), ‘International Evidence on the Determinants of Trade Dynamics’, IMF Staff Papers, 45 (3), 401–439;

Ramey, G and V. Ramey (1995), ‘Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between Volatility and Growth’, American Economic Review, 85 (5);

Razin Assaf, Efraim Sadka and Tarek Coury (2003), ‘Trade Openness, Investment Instability, and Terms-of-Trade Volatility’, Journal of International Economics, 61, 285–306;

Talvi, E. and C.A. Vegh (2000), ‘Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy’, NBER Working Paper, 7499;

Wang Z., Winters L.A. (1991), The trading potential of Eastern Europe, CEPR Discussion Paper 610;

Wolf H. (1997), “Patterns of Intra and Inter State Trade”, in National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper n.5939;

Wolf, H. (2004), ‘Volatility: Definitions and Consequences’, in World Bank (ed), Managing Volatility and Crises: A Practitioner’s Guide, PREM Economic Policy, Managing Volatility Thematic Group;

World Bank (2006), World Development Data.